Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

被引:38
|
作者
Mendez-Torres, F [1 ]
Woods, M [1 ]
Thomas, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Urol, Sect Minimally Invas Urol Surg, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2005.19.393
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is gaining acceptance as a standard of care for the repair of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, with results comparable to those of open repair. However, it remains a technically challenging procedure requiring intracorporeal suturing skills. Recent reports have demonstrated equally effective results with robot-assisted laparoscopy with shorter operative times. We present our modified technique for daVinci robot-assisted LP. Patients and Methods: From November 2002 to May 2004, 32 consecutive patients underwent LP with the daVinci robotic system for UPJ obstruction. Just prior to laparoscopy, 31 patients underwent retrograde pyelography hy and cystoseopic placement of a ureteral catheter just distal to the UPJ, which was prepared into the operative field. The remaining patient had an indwelling stent placed preoperatively. Three transperitoneal ports ire placed for the robot. A fourth port is placed for retraction, suction, dissection, and suture passage by the bedside surgeon. This port was placed at McBurney's point in the first two patients and the subxiphoid area in the subsequent 30 patients. A ureteral stent was inserted retrograde intraoperatively with laparoscopic assistance after exchanging the ureteral catheter for a guidewire. A Jackson-Pratt drain was placed in all cases. Results: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty was perfor med in 31 patients, while Fengerplasty was performed in 1 patient. The average operative time was 300 minutes (initial 12 procedures: 384 minutes; last 10 procedures: 197 minutes). The average blood loss was approximately 50 mL and the average hospital stay 1.1 days. A crossing vessel was present in 44% of the cases. Stone extraction was performed in 5 cases (23%) and kidney biopsy in I case. The only perioperative complications were one migrated stent, which was repositioned under sedation without sequelae and one urinarytract infection. Of the 18 patients with follow-up exceeding 6 months (average 10.3 months), 16 have improved drainage and function and are asymptomatic. One patient with flank pain has no evidence of obstruction. One with delayed, although improved, drainage is asymptomatic. Conclusions: The daVinci robot system can be used effectively for LP. Although initial operative times were long, t:here was a significant decrease after the first 12 cases. Having retrograde access to the ureter allows simple intraoperative stent placement. We found that the subxiphoid placement of the fourth port gave the bedside surgeon the optimal location for suction, dissection, and intracorporeal suture passage. This approach and technique have become standard in our treatment of UPJ obstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 396
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A retrospective case series review
    Kumar, Sunil
    Bhirud, Deepak Prakash
    Mittal, Ankur
    Navriya, Shiv Charan
    Ranjan, Satish Kumar
    Mammen, Kim Jacob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2021, 17 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [32] Cosmetics after open, laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Pyeloplasty Comment
    Lassmann, Jenny
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2022, 53 (05) : 390 - +
  • [33] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single-centre experience
    Thomas Charles Wood
    Nicholas Raison
    Oussama El-Hage
    Kamran Ahmed
    Declan Cahill
    Benjamin J. Challacombe
    Muhammad Shamim Khan
    Prokar Dasgupta
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 4590 - 4596
  • [34] Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Where Are We Now?
    Abdulfattah, Suhaib
    Mittal, Sameer
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 25 (03) : 55 - 61
  • [35] Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Where Are We Now?
    Suhaib Abdulfattah
    Sameer Mittal
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2024, 25 : 55 - 61
  • [36] Functional outcomes after pure laparoscopic or robot-assisted pyeloplasty
    Ferhi, Karim
    Roupret, Morgan
    Misrai, Vincent
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Chartier-Kastler, Emmanuel
    Richard, Francois
    Vaessen, Christophe
    [J]. ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2009, 33 (10): : 1103 - 1107
  • [37] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single-centre experience
    Wood, Thomas Charles
    Raison, Nicholas
    El-Hage, Oussama
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Cahill, Declan
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Khan, Muhammad Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (11): : 4590 - 4596
  • [38] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is feasible through three ports
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A30 - A30
  • [39] TRANSMESOLOLIC ROBOT-ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY
    Bianchi, G.
    Pini, G.
    Annino, F.
    Micali, S.
    Sighinolfi, M. C.
    De Stefani, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 342 - 342
  • [40] TRANSMESOCOLIC ROBOT-ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY
    Bianchi, G.
    Pini, G.
    Annino, F.
    Micali, S.
    Beato, A.
    De stefani, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A388 - A388