共 50 条
Digital Health Technologies for Remote Monitoring and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review
被引:30
|作者:
Nguyen, Nghia H.
[1
]
Martinez, Ivonne
[2
]
Atreja, Ashish
[2
,3
]
Sitapati, Amy M.
[4
,5
,6
]
Sandborn, William J.
[1
]
Ohno-Machado, Lucila
[4
]
Singh, Siddharth
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Med, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[3] UC Davis Hlth, Sacramento, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Biomed Informat, Dept Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[6] UCSD Hlth Syst, Populat Hlth, La Jolla, CA USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
HOME TELEMANAGEMENT;
ULCERATIVE-COLITIS;
CLINICAL-TRIAL;
CHILDREN;
CARE;
TELEMEDICINE;
ADOLESCENTS;
CHALLENGES;
EHEALTH;
D O I:
10.14309/ajg.0000000000001545
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
INTRODUCTION: Digital health technologies may be useful tools in the management of chronic diseases. We performed a systematic review of digital health interventions in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and evaluated its impact on (i) disease activity monitoring, (ii) treatment adherence, (iii) quality of life (QoL) measures, and/or (iv) health care utilization. METHODS: Through a systematic review of multiple databases through August 31, 2020, we identified randomized controlled trials in patients with IBD comparing digital health technologies vs standard of care (SoC) for clinical management and monitoring and reporting impact on IBD disease activity, treatment adherence, QoL, and/or health care utilization or cost-effectiveness. We performed critical qualitative synthesis of the evidence supporting digital health interventions in patients with IBD and rated certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Overall, we included 14 randomized controlled trials (median, 98 patients; range 34-909 patients; follow-up <12 months) that compared web-based interventions, mobile applications, and different telemedicine platforms with SoC (clinic-based encounters). Although overall disease activity and risk of relapse were comparable between digital health technologies and SoC (very low certainty of evidence), digital health interventions were associated with lower rate of health care utilization and health care costs (low certainty of evidence). Digital health interventions did not significantly improve patients' QoL and treatment adherence compared with SoC (very low certainty of evidence). Trials may have intrinsic selection bias due to nature of digital interventions. DISCUSSION: Digital health technologies may be effective in decreasing health care utilization and costs, though may not offer advantage in reducing risk of relapse, QoL, and improving treatment adherence in patients with IBD. These techniques may offer value-based care for population health management.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 97
页数:20
相关论文