Introducing landscape accuracy metric for spatial performance evaluation of land use/land cover change models

被引:9
|
作者
Amiri, Bahman Jabbarian [1 ]
Asgarian, Ali [2 ]
Sakieh, Yousef [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Dept Environm Sci, Fac Nat Resources, Karaj, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Environm Sci, Fac Nat Resources, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Gorgan Univ Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Dept Environm, Gorgan, Iran
关键词
Landscape accuracy metric; validation metrics; spatial simulation; LULC models; landscape metrics; CELLULAR-AUTOMATA MODEL; URBAN-GROWTH; PATTERN-ANALYSIS; VALIDATION; INFORMATION; CALIBRATION; DIMENSION; BEHAVIOR; SCALE; MAPS;
D O I
10.1080/10106049.2016.1206628
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Performance evaluation is a critical step for land use/land cover (LULC) change modelling. It can be conducted through pixel quantity and its geographical location according to majority of current approaches. It is hence important to know to what extent spatial patterns of a given landscape are properly replicated in simulated LULC maps. Therefore, a new validation metric, named as landscape accuracy metric (LAM), is introduced by inspiration from landscape ecology. Unlike pixel quantity validation metrics, model performance is measured by LAM through quantifying spatial patterns including structure, composition and configuration attributes. The functionality of LAM was studied to assess the performance of the built-up change simulation under historical, ecological and stochastic scenarios, applying Cellular Automata Markov model. LAM is a flexible measure such that modellers can apply this metric through adding or eliminating various metrics of their interest in a selective manner and under different environmental circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1187
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Kailash Sacred Landscape of China
    Duan, Cheng
    Shi, Peili
    Song, Minghua
    Zhang, Xianzhou
    Zong, Ning
    Zhou, Caiping
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (06): : 1788
  • [2] Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models
    Peter H. Verburg
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21 : 1171 - 1183
  • [3] Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models
    Verburg, Peter H.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2006, 21 (08) : 1171 - 1183
  • [4] Spatial features of land use/land cover change in the United States
    Zhiqiang Gao
    Jiyuan Liu
    Xiangzheng Deng
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2003, 13 (1) : 63 - 70
  • [5] Spatial features of land use/land cover change in the United States
    GAO Zhiqiang
    [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2003, (01) : 61 - 68
  • [6] Evaluating the effects of spatial resolution on land use and land cover classification accuracy
    Mishra, Varun Narayan
    Prasad, Rajendra
    Kumar, Pradeep
    Gupta, Dileep Kumar
    Dikshit, Prabhat Kumar Singh
    Dwivedi, Shyam Bihari
    Ohri, Anurag
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROWAVE, OPTICAL AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (ICMOCE), 2015, : 208 - 211
  • [7] A review on change detection method and accuracy assessment for land use land cover
    Chughtai, Ali Hassan
    Abbasi, Habibullah
    Karas, Ismail Rakip
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 22
  • [8] What is the influence of landscape metric selection on the calibration of land-use/cover simulation models?
    Lin, Jinyao
    Li, Xia
    Li, Shaoying
    Wen, Youyue
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2020, 129
  • [9] A new metric to assess the predictive accuracy of multinomial land cover models
    Douma, Jacob C.
    Cornwell, William K.
    van Bodegom, Peter M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2017, 44 (06) : 1212 - 1224
  • [10] Performance evaluation of land change simulation models using landscape metrics
    Dezhkam, Sadeq
    Jabbarian Amiri, Bahman
    Darvishsefat, Ali Asghar
    Sakieh, Yousef
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 32 (06) : 655 - 677