Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation

被引:31
|
作者
Bero, Lisa [1 ]
Lawrence, Rosa [2 ]
Leslie, Louis [2 ]
Chiu, Kellia [3 ,4 ]
McDonald, Sally [3 ,4 ]
Page, Matthew J. [5 ]
Grundy, Quinn [6 ]
Parker, Lisa [7 ]
Boughton, Stephanie [8 ]
Kirkham, Jamie J. [9 ]
Featherstone, Robin [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Gen Internal Med, Publ Hlth, Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Anschutz Med Ctr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Cochrane, Editorial & Methods Dept, London, England
[9] Univ Manchester, Biostat, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
ethics (see Medical Ethics); public health; qualitative research; OUTCOMES; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting International medical literature. Participants Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observational studies of COVID-19 treatment or prevention from the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register published between 1 March 2020 and 30 October 2020. Main outcome measures Study characteristics and discrepancies in (1) results reporting (number of outcomes, outcome descriptor, measure, metric, assessment time point, data reported, reported statistical significance of result, type of statistical analysis, subgroup analyses (if any), whether outcome was identified as primary or secondary) and (2) spin (reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results so they are viewed more favourably). Results Of 67 included studies, 23 (34%) had no discrepancies in results reporting between preprints and journal publications. Fifteen (22%) studies had at least one outcome that was included in the journal publication, but not the preprint; eight (12%) had at least one outcome that was reported in the preprint only. For outcomes that were reported in both preprints and journals, common discrepancies were differences in numerical values and statistical significance, additional statistical tests and subgroup analyses and longer follow-up times for outcome assessment in journal publications. At least one instance of spin occurred in both preprints and journals in 23/67 (34%) studies, the preprint only in 5 (7%), and the journal publications only in 2 (3%). Spin was removed between the preprint and journal publication in 5/67 (7%) studies; but added in 1/67 (1%) study. Conclusions The COVID-19 preprints and their subsequent journal publications were largely similar in reporting of study characteristics, outcomes and spin. All COVID-19 studies published as preprints and journal publications should be critically evaluated for discrepancies and spin.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Egypt: a cross-sectional study
    Shawki, May Ahmed
    Kamel, Ahmed
    Gamal, Shaza
    Abbassi, Maggie Magdy
    Farid, Samar Farghali
    Sabry, Nirmeen Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2023, 17 (09): : 1188 - +
  • [32] Focused Ultrasonography in COVID-19: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study
    Mathew, Manju
    Kalliath, Antony
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (06) : OC21 - OC25
  • [33] The acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study
    Mbonigaba, Edward
    Yu, Fengyun
    Renosa, Mark Donald C.
    Mwikarago, Ivan Emil
    Cho, Frederick Nchang
    Elad, Peter Canisius Kuku
    Metzger, Wolfram
    Muhindo, Richard
    Chen, Qiushi
    Denkinger, Claudia M.
    McMahon, Shannon A.
    Chen, Simiao
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Effects of COVID-19 in Endocrine Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Morini, Elisabetta
    Maresca, Giuseppa
    Bonanno, Lilla
    Corallo, Francesco
    Lo Buono, Viviana
    De Cola, Maria Cristina
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (10):
  • [35] A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 outbreak in Indian population
    Arumugam, Murugesan
    Najimudeen, Raleena Begum Haja
    Vijayan, Arya
    Sathyamoorthy, Bhuvaneshwari
    Patole, Prashant S.
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 76
  • [36] Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study
    Magalhaes, Joao Eudes
    Sampaio Rocha-Filho, Pedro A. A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY, 2023, 29 (04) : 472 - 478
  • [37] Repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on athletes: a cross-sectional study
    Lopes, Lucas R.
    Miranda, Vitor A. R.
    Goes, Rodrigo A.
    Souza, Gabriel G. A.
    Souza, Giuliana R.
    Rocha, Jessica C. S.
    Cossich, Victor R. A.
    Perini, Jamila A.
    BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2021, 38 (04) : 703 - 711
  • [38] Climate and COVID-19 transmission: a cross-sectional study in Africa
    Ousmane Koanda
    Roland Yonaba
    Fowé Tazen
    Héla Karoui
    Mohamed Lamine Sidibé
    Babacar Lèye
    Mamadou Diop
    Harinaivo Anderson Andrianisa
    Harouna Karambiri
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [39] Climate and COVID-19 transmission: a cross-sectional study in Africa
    Koanda, Ousmane
    Yonaba, Roland
    Tazen, Fowe
    Karoui, Hela
    Sidibe, Mohamed Lamine
    Leye, Babacar
    Diop, Mamadou
    Andrianisa, Harinaivo Anderson
    Karambiri, Harouna
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [40] Risk perceptions of COVID-19 in Beijing: a cross-sectional study
    Liu, Qing
    Tan, Yiyang
    Zhu, Zheng
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Fu, Yaqun
    Wang, Quan
    Nie, Zhijie
    Yang, Li
    Li, Xiaoguang
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15