Multilevel Motivation and Engagement: Assessing Construct Validity Across Students and Schools

被引:17
|
作者
Martin, Andrew J. [1 ]
Malmberg, Lars-Erik [2 ]
Liem, Gregory Arief D.
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Educ & Social Work, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
multilevel; motivation; engagement; construct validity; GOAL STRUCTURES; CLASSROOM; MODEL; ACHIEVEMENT; PERSPECTIVE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1177/0013164410378089
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Statistical biases associated with single-level analyses underscore the importance of partitioning variance/covariance matrices into individual and group levels. From a multilevel perspective based on data from 21,579 students in 58 high schools, the present study assesses the multilevel factor structure of motivation and engagement with a particular focus on a recently developed instrument (the Motivation and Engagement Scale-High School; MES-HS) shown in a wide variety of contexts to reflect sound student-level psychometric properties. Multilevel (or hierarchical linear) confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus demonstrated that at student and school levels, the hypothesized framework comprised sound factor structure. Multilevel invariance tests further demonstrated that key parameters were invariant across student and school levels. Results also showed that first and higher order factor correlations were in hypothesized directions and broadly parallel at student and school levels. Taken together, the MES-HS target factors and the framework from which they emanate demonstrate sound multilevel psychometric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 989
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Construct Validity of Student Engagement: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach
    Steven M. LaNasa
    Alberto F. Cabrera
    Heather Trangsrud
    Research in Higher Education, 2009, 50 : 315 - 332
  • [42] CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (CCSSE)
    Angell, Lance R.
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2009, 33 (07) : 564 - 570
  • [43] Assessing the construct validity of the adjustment scales for children and adolescents
    Canivez, GL
    Sprouls, K
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 23 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [44] The Construct Validity of Student Engagement: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach
    LaNasa, Steven M.
    Cabrera, Alberto F.
    Trangsrud, Heather
    RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 50 (04) : 315 - 332
  • [45] Construct Validity of the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator Structure for Assessing Students' Patient Encounter Skills
    Tolsgaard, Martin G.
    Arendrup, Henrick
    Lindhardt, Bjarne O.
    Hillingso, Jens G.
    Stoltenberg, Michael
    Ringsted, Charlotte
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (06) : 799 - 806
  • [46] ASSESSING ASSERTION - AN INVESTIGATION OF CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
    KERN, JM
    MACDONALD, ML
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 48 (04) : 532 - 534
  • [47] ASSESSING THE CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF RATIONAL BIODATA SCALES
    KILCULLEN, RN
    WHITE, LA
    MUMFORD, MD
    MACK, H
    MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 7 (01) : 17 - 28
  • [48] Assessing civic moral disengagement: Dimensionality and construct validity
    Caprara, Gian Vittorio
    Fida, Roberta
    Vecchione, Michele
    Tramontano, Carlo
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 47 (05) : 504 - 509
  • [49] Assessing the construct validity of BESTest in people with multiple sclerosis
    Aydin, Y.
    Irkec, C.
    Guclu-Gunduz, A.
    Ozkan, T.
    Yazici, G.
    Ozkul, C.
    Nazliel, B.
    Batur-Caglayan, H.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 : 703 - 703
  • [50] Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity - Construct validity
    Tudor-Locke, C
    Williams, JE
    Reis, JP
    Pluto, D
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 34 (05) : 281 - 291