Active inference, selective attention, and the cocktail party problem

被引:10
|
作者
Holmes, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Parr, Thomas [2 ]
Griffiths, Timothy D. [2 ,3 ]
Friston, Karl J. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Speech Hearing & Phonet Sci, London WC1N 1PF, England
[2] UCL, Wellcome Ctr Human Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3AR, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Biosci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
关键词
Selective attention; Preparatory attention; Spatial attention; Temporal attention; Cocktail party listening; Active inference; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE-VARIATION; ORIENTING ATTENTION; AUDITORY ATTENTION; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; TIME; OSCILLATIONS; CORTEX; POTENTIALS; CONTINUITY; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.038
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce a new generative model for an active inference account of preparatory and selective attention, in the context of a classic 'cocktail party' paradigm. In this setup, pairs of words are presented simultaneously to the left and right ears and an instructive spatial cue directs attention to the left or right. We use this generative model to test competing hypotheses about the way that human listeners direct preparatory and selective attention. We show that assigning low precision to words at attended-relative to unattended-locations can explain why a listener reports words from a competing sentence. Under this model, temporal changes in sensory precision were not needed to account for faster reaction times with longer cue-target intervals, but were necessary to explain ramping effects on event-related potentials (ERPs)-resembling the contingent negative variation (CNV)-during the preparatory interval. These simulations reveal that different processes are likely to underlie the improvement in reaction times and the ramping of ERPs that are associated with spatial cueing.
引用
收藏
页码:1288 / 1304
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Introducing a Bayesian model of selective attention based on active inference
    Mirza, M. Berk
    Adams, Rick A.
    Friston, Karl
    Parr, Thomas
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [32] THE COCKTAIL PARTY PHENOMENON REVISITED - ATTENTION AND MEMORY IN THE CLASSIC SELECTIVE LISTENING PROCEDURE OF CHERRY (1953)
    WOOD, NL
    COWAN, N
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1995, 124 (03) : 243 - 262
  • [33] Solution to the cocktail party problem: A time-reversal active metasurface for multipoint focusing
    Bourdeloux, Constant
    Fink, Mathias
    Lemoult, Fabrice
    PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2024, 21 (05):
  • [34] Cortical interference effects in the cocktail party problem
    Rajiv Narayan
    Virginia Best
    Erol Ozmeral
    Elizabeth McClaine
    Micheal Dent
    Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
    Kamal Sen
    Nature Neuroscience, 2007, 10 : 1601 - 1607
  • [35] Attention modulates 'speech-tracking' at a cocktail party
    Zion-Golumbic, Elena
    Schroeder, Charles E.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (07) : 363 - 364
  • [36] Cortical interference effects in the cocktail party problem
    Narayan, Rajiv
    Best, Virginia
    Ozmeral, Erol
    McClaine, Elizabeth
    Dent, Micheal
    Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara
    Sen, Kamal
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (12) : 1601 - 1607
  • [37] Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem
    Jones, Gary L.
    Litovsky, Ruth Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 124 (06): : 3818 - 3830
  • [38] A biologically motivated solution to the cocktail party problem
    Sagi, B
    Nemat-Nasser, SC
    Kerr, R
    Hayek, R
    Downing, C
    Hecht-Nielsen, R
    NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2001, 13 (07) : 1575 - 1602
  • [39] Role of masker predictability in the cocktail party problem
    Jones, Gary L.
    Litovsky, Ruth Y.
    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009, 124 (06): : 3818 - 3830
  • [40] Cognitive control in the cocktail party: Preparing selective attention to dichotically presented voices supports distractor suppression
    Sophie Nolden
    Camellia N. Ibrahim
    Iring Koch
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2019, 81 : 727 - 737