Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

被引:49
|
作者
Sattler, Matteo C. [1 ]
Jaunig, Johannes [1 ]
Watson, Estelle D. [2 ,3 ]
van Poppel, Mireille N. M. [1 ,4 ]
Mokkink, Lidwine B. [5 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [5 ]
Dietz, Pavel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Sport Sci, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Exercise Sci & Sports Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Therapeut Sci, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, MRC Wits Dev Pathways Hlth Res Unit, Dept Paediat, Fac Hlth Sci,Sch Clin Med, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; WEIGHT-GAIN; CUT-POINTS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ACCELEROMETER; HEALTH; VALIDATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn order toassess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties.ObjectivesTo systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity,construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.ResultsSeventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.ConclusionsWe recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2317 / 2346
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: A systematic review of content and format
    Williams, Kate
    Frei, Anja
    Vetsch, Anders
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Ruedell, Katja
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2012, 10
  • [33] Structured review of physical activity measurement with questionnaires and scales in older adults and the elderly
    Adolf Guirao-Goris, Josep
    Cabrero-Garcia, Julio
    Moreno Pina, J. Patricia
    Luz Munoz-Mendoza, Carmen
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 (04) : 334 - 334
  • [34] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRES IN PEOPLE OVER 65 YEARS OLD
    Chamorro-Quiros, J.
    Sanchez-Zafra, M.
    Sanabrias-Moreno, D.
    de Mesa, C. Gonzalez-Gonzalez
    Zagalaz-Sanchez, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH RESEARCH, 2023, 15 (02): : 255 - 266
  • [35] Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: A systematic review of content and format
    Kate Williams
    Anja Frei
    Anders Vetsch
    Fabienne Dobbels
    Milo A Puhan
    Katja Rüdell
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10
  • [36] Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
    Kenji Doma
    Renée Speyer
    Lauren Alese Parsons
    Reinie Cordier
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [37] Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
    Doma, Kenji
    Speyer, Renee
    Parsons, Lauren Alese
    Cordier, Reinie
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [38] Physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review and analysis of their psychometric properties in Spanish population over 60 years old
    Sanchez-Lastra, Miguel A.
    Martinez-Lemos, Ivan
    Cancela, Jose M.
    Ayan, Carlos
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2018, 92
  • [39] Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systematic review
    Jasper M Schellingerhout
    Martijn W Heymans
    Arianne P Verhagen
    Henrica C de Vet
    Bart W Koes
    Caroline B Terwee
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11
  • [40] Systematic review of measurement properties of questionnaires measuring somatization in primary care patients
    Sitnikova, Kate
    Dijkstra-Kersten, Sandra M. A.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terluin, Berend
    van Marwijk, Harm W. J.
    Leone, Stephanie S.
    van der Horst, Henriette E.
    van der Wouden, Johannes C.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2017, 103 : 42 - 62