Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine

被引:40
|
作者
Seco, J [1 ]
Adams, E
Bidmead, M
Partridge, M
Verhaegen, F
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London SW3 6JJ, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[5] McGill Univ, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 50卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/007
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
IMRT is frequently used in the head-and-neck region, which contains materials of widely differing densities (soft tissue, bone, air-cavities). Conventional methods of dose computation for these complex, inhomogeneous IMRT cases involve significant approximations. In the present work, a methodology for the development, commissioning and implementation of a Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation engine for intensity modulated radiotherapy (MC-IMRT) is proposed which can be used by radiotherapy centres interested in developing MC-IMRT capabilities for research or clinical evaluations. The method proposes three levels for developing, commissioning and maintaining a MC-IMRT dose calculation engine: (a) development of a MC model of the linear accelerator, (b) validation of MC model for IMRT and (c) periodic quality assurance (QA) of the MC-IMRT system. The first step, level (a), in developing an MC-IMRT system is to build a model of the linac that correctly predicts standard open field measurements for percentage depth-dose and off-axis ratios. Validation of MC-IMRT, level (b), can be performed in a rando phantom and in a homogeneous water equivalent phantom. Ultimately, periodic quality assurance of the MC-IMRT system is needed to verify the MC-IMRT dose calculation system, level (c). Once the MC-IMRT dose calculation system is commissioned it can be applied to more complex clinical IMRT treatments. The MC-IMRT system implemented at the Royal Marsden Hospital was used for IMRT calculations for a patient undergoing treatment for primary disease with nodal involvement in the head-and-neck region (primary treated to 65 Gy and nodes to 54 Gy), while sparing the spinal cord, brain stem and parotid glands. Preliminary MC results predict a decrease of approximately 1-2 Gy in the median dose of both the primary tumour and nodal volumes (compared with both pencil beam and collapsed cone). This is possibly due to the large air-cavity (the larynx of the patient) situated in the centre of the primary PTV and the approximations present in the dose calculation.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 830
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictive Gamma Passing Rate Based On Dose Uncertainty for Head-And-Neck and Prostate IMRT
    Shiba, E.
    Saito, A.
    Tsuneda, M.
    Furumi, M.
    Yahara, K.
    Ohguri, T.
    Murakami, Y.
    Nishio, T.
    Korogi, Y.
    Nagata, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E282 - E282
  • [32] Monte Carlo Versus Pencil Beam Dose Calculation for Spine SBRT Treatments Using HybridARC and Sliding Windows IMRT
    Venencia, C.
    Pino, M.
    Caussa, L.
    Molineu, A.
    Garrigo, E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3549 - +
  • [33] Monte Carlo Simulation of Fast Neutron Treatments for Head and Neck Cancers
    Moffitt, G.
    Stewart, R.
    Sandison, G.
    Emery, R.
    Jevremovic, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [34] Dose variations in tumor volumes and organs at risk during IMRT for head-and-neck cancer
    Beltran, Merce
    Ramos, Monica
    Jose Rovira, Juan
    Perez-Hoyos, Santiago
    Sancho, Marc
    Puertas, Enrique
    Benavente, Sergi
    Ginjaume, Merce
    Giralt, Jordi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (06): : 101 - 111
  • [35] Target equivalent uniform dose as a quality indicator for head-and-neck IMRT treatment plans
    Constantinescu, C.
    Al-Wassia, R.
    Al-Hebshi, A.
    Bahadur, Y.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S214 - S215
  • [36] Effect of voxel size on Monte Carlo dose calculation for IMRT treatment planning
    Mora, G
    Li, JS
    Xiong, W
    King, I
    Ma, CM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1451 - 1451
  • [37] Comparison of IMRT verification by means of film dosimetry and Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Gotzfried, T.
    Rickhey, M.
    Treutwein, W.
    Bogner, L.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 183 : 28 - 28
  • [38] Improving simulation efficiency of MLCs for Monte Carlo based dose calculation of IMRT
    Jang, S
    Liu, H
    Vassiliev, O
    Mohan, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2012 - 2012
  • [39] Dependences of mucosal dose on photon beams in head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study
    Chow, James C. L.
    Owrangi, Amir M.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [40] Comparison of Bone Dose in a Head-And-Neck Air Cavity Between the FFF and FF Photon Beams: A Monte Carlo Study
    Chow, J.
    Owrangi, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E618 - E618