Comparative study on energy sustainability of biofuel production chains

被引:18
|
作者
Cocco, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dept Mech Engn, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
关键词
biodiesel; bioethanol; biomass power production; energy sustainability;
D O I
10.1243/09576509JPE365
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper is concerned with a comparative study of the energy sustainability of the production of biodiesel from oleaginous plants (rape and sunflower), of bioethanol from sugar crops (sugar beet and sweet sorghum) and of electricity from lignocellulose materials (miscanthus and short rotation forestry poplar). The results show the lignocellulose feedstock to perform best in terms of both net energy produced per unit area of cultivated land, from around 184 GJ/ha to more than 434 GJ/ha, and of energy ratio between energy produced and energy consumed, in the order of 12-19. Biodiesel and bioethanol production were found to be less advantageous in terms of energy sustainability, especially when residues and by-products are not used as feedstock. For bioethanol production, sweet sorghum exhibited the higher energy ratio of around 5.2, due mainly to the heat recovered from residue in cogeneration plants. As for biodiesel production, neither the rape nor the sunflower proved to be particularly sustainable with an energy ratio of around 1.3-1.4, but performance can be improved using the agricultural and industrial processing residues to produce energy, increasing energy ratios up to 3.4-4.2.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 645
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Different particle size study of castor deoiled cake for biofuel production with an environmental sustainability perspective
    Deshmukh, Minal
    Pande, Ashwini
    Marathe, Anant
    [J]. HELIYON, 2022, 8 (06)
  • [32] Hydrogen production in the light of sustainability: A comparative study on the hydrogen production technologies using the sustainability index assessment method
    Norouzi, Nima
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 54 (04) : 1288 - 1294
  • [33] Comparative review of three approaches to biofuel production from energy crops as feedstock in a developing country
    Nikkhah, Amin
    El Haj Assad, Mamdouh
    Rosentrater, Kurt A.
    Ghnimi, Sami
    Van Haute, Sam
    [J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2020, 10
  • [34] Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Clermidy, Sonia
    Benoist, Antony
    Maurel, Veronique Bellon
    Gasol, Caries M.
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    Arroja, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 76 : 42 - 54
  • [35] Energy production from grassland - Assessing the sustainability of different process chains under German conditions
    Roesch, Christine
    Skarka, J.
    Raab, K.
    Stelzer, V.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (04): : 689 - 700
  • [36] Microalgae as a Renewable Energy Source for Biofuel Production
    Ahmad, Irshad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 10 (01): : 95 - 102
  • [37] Energy crops for biofuel production or for food? - SWOT analysis (case study: Greece)
    Paschalidou, A.
    Tsatiris, M.
    Kitikidou, K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 93 : 636 - 647
  • [38] Development of a sustainability assessment framework for planning for sustainability for biofuel production at the policy, programme or project level
    Haywood, L. K.
    de Wet, B.
    von Maltitz, G. P.
    Brent, A. C.
    [J]. ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY II, 2009, 121 : 355 - 365
  • [39] Biofuel Crop Sustainability
    Olsen, Livia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & FOOD INFORMATION, 2014, 15 (04) : 357 - 358
  • [40] Analysis of environmental and economic tradeoffs in switchgrass supply chains for biofuel production
    Zhong, Jia
    Yu, T. Edward
    Larson, James A.
    English, Burton C.
    Fu, Joshua S.
    Calcagno, James
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 107 : 791 - 803