The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration: An update

被引:95
|
作者
Chew, Jia Wei [1 ,2 ]
Kilduff, James [3 ]
Belfort, Georges [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Chem & Biomed Engn, Singapore 637459, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Membrane Technol Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[3] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Howard P Isermann Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[5] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Ctr Biotechnol & Interdisciplinary Studies, Troy, NY 12180 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Crossflow microfiltration; Membrane fouling and mitigation; Membrane modules; Fouling models; CHANNEL MEMBRANE SYSTEM; HOLLOW-FIBER MEMBRANE; NATURAL ORGANIC-MATTER; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; BOVINE SERUM-ALBUMIN; ACTIVATED CARBON GAC; MODELING CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; ALTERNATING TANGENTIAL FLOW; SITU MONITORING TECHNIQUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117865
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
More than two decades after the highly-cited review on microfiltration of suspensions and macromolecular solutions, it is time to revisit and update the fundamentals and applications of this topic. This includes addressing inevitable fouling phenomena, the description of fouling, fouling models, means to mitigate fouling and the modernization of membrane modules. Mass transfer limitations, related to concentration polarization and fouling, remain the Achilles' heel. Since empirical expressions that describe fouling offer limited predictive ability and mechanistic insight, there is an urgent need for more in-depth fundamental understanding. Elucidating interfacial interaction energies has gained much attention in recent years; the DLVO model (and its extension) has been validated for a wide range of foulants. The use of molecular dynamics simulations to model transport and fouling represents a major advance, providing insights not possible through experiments. Building on classical fouling mechanisms, new models hold promise to provide more realistic description of fouling phenomena. Fouling mitigation efforts have focused on high-throughput modification platforms and more energy-efficient unsteady-state shear methods. Finally, membrane modules can be modernized based on the knowledge accumulated to better improve their efficiency, and factoring in important considerations like feed type, mechanical stability, hydrodynamics, economics and application goals.
引用
收藏
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mechanisms and control of fouling in crossflow microfiltration
    Wenten, I.G.
    Filtration and Separation, 1995, 32 (03):
  • [42] Formation of dynamic membranes with crossflow microfiltration
    AlMalack, MH
    Anderson, GK
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 112 (02) : 287 - 296
  • [43] Mechanism of cake formation in crossflow microfiltration
    Nakakura, H
    Ohta, H
    Sadai, S
    Osasa, K
    Sambuichi, M
    KAGAKU KOGAKU RONBUNSHU, 2000, 26 (03) : 354 - 359
  • [44] DEVELOPMENT STUDIES OF CROSSFLOW MICROFILTRATION.
    Bertera, Ray
    Steven, Hugo
    Metcalfe, Malcolm
    Chemical Engineer (London), 1984, (404): : 10 - 11
  • [45] Crossflow microfiltration for suspension thickening and washing
    Holdich, RG
    Cumming, IW
    Ismail, B
    7TH WORLD FILTRATION CONGRESS, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II, 1996, : 427 - 431
  • [46] Prevention of particle deposition in crossflow microfiltration
    Buffham, B.A.
    Cumming, I.W.
    Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1995, 73 (A4) : 445 - 454
  • [47] Crossflow microfiltration of marble processing wastewaters
    Afonso, MD
    Alves, AMB
    Mohsen, M
    DESALINATION, 2002, 149 (1-3) : 153 - 162
  • [48] Use of crossflow microfiltration in wastewater treatment
    Al-Malack, MH
    Anderson, GK
    WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (12) : 3064 - 3072
  • [49] Bacterial rejection in crossflow microfiltration of sewage
    Judd, SJ
    Till, SW
    DESALINATION, 2000, 127 (03) : 251 - 260
  • [50] Dimensional analysis of crossflow microfiltration data
    Foley, Greg
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 41 (14) : 3169 - 3185