Community-based residential supports for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: The views of neighbours

被引:12
|
作者
Robertson, J
Emerson, E
Pinkney, L
Caesar, E
Felce, D
Meek, A
Carr, D
Lowe, K
Knapp, M
Hallam, A
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Inst Hlth Res, Lancaster LA1 4YT, England
[2] Welsh Ctr Learning Disabilities, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[3] Bro Morgannwg NHS Trust, Learning Disabilities Directorate, Bridgend, Wales
[4] Inst Psychiat, Ctr Econ Mental Hlth, London, England
关键词
intellectual disabilities; community care; neighbours;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00208.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Background The issue of the views of neighbours of community-based residential supports for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour has not been examined till date. This study looks at the views of neighbours of two types of community-based residential supports: non-congregate settings where the minority of residents have challenging behaviour; and congregate settings where the majority of residents have challenging behaviour. Materials and methods A self-completion questionnaire was used to collect information on contact between neighbours, residents and staff, and the views of neighbours. Information was also collected by semi-structured interview with service staff on the characteristics of settings. Results Sixty-four questionnaires were returned. Contact between neighbours and service users was limited for both types of setting, with two-thirds of neighbours not knowing any service users by name, and a third having had no active contact with service users. Neighbours of non-congregate settings were more likely to think that community care was a 'good policy' (76%) than neighbours of congregate settings (53%) and to believe that there were benefits to the neighbourhood from having the group home in the area (46% versus 29%) but these differences were not significant. Contact with people with intellectual disabilities was associated with more positive attitudes to community care and specific characteristics of the settings. Conclusions Contact between neighbours and people with severe intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour is limited. However, the majority of neighbours are positive about community care and the problems reported by neighbours are predominantly minor. The results point to the key role that contact plays in fostering positive attitudes. Findings regarding differences between congregate and non-congregate settings are limited by the small number of responses from neighbours of congregate settings.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 92
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An evaluation of specialized community-based residential supports for people with challenging behaviour
    Golding, Laura
    Emerson, Eric
    Thornton, Amanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2005, 9 (02) : 145 - 154
  • [2] Quality & costs of community residential supports for people with intellectual disabilities (ID) and challenging behaviour (CB)
    Emerson, E
    Robertson, J
    Robertson, J
    Felce, D
    Meek, A
    Carr, D
    Knapp, M
    Hallam, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2004, 48 : 415 - 415
  • [3] Staff stress and morale in community-based settings for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: A brief report
    Robertson, J
    Hatton, C
    Felce, D
    Meek, A
    Carr, D
    Knapp, M
    Hallam, A
    Emerson, E
    Pinkney, L
    Caesar, E
    Lowe, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2005, 18 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [4] A QUALITY OF LIFE PERSPECTIVE IN THE SUPPORTS OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR
    Claes, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (10) : 907 - 907
  • [5] The quality and costs of community-based residential supports and residential campuses for people with severe and complex disabilities
    Emerson, Eric
    Robertson, Janet
    Gregory, Nicky
    Kessissoglou, Sophia
    Hatton, Chris
    Hallam, Angela
    Knapp, Martin
    Jaerbrink, Krister
    Netten, Ann
    Linehan, Christine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2000, 25 (04): : 263 - 279
  • [6] Quality and costs of community-based residential supports for people with mental retardation and challenging behavior
    Robertson, J
    Emerson, E
    Pinkney, L
    Caesar, E
    Felce, D
    Meek, A
    Carr, D
    Lowe, K
    Knapp, M
    Hallam, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION, 2004, 109 (04): : 332 - 344
  • [7] Influence of the organizational environment on challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities: Professionals' views
    Olivier-Pijpers, Vanessa C.
    Cramm, Jane M.
    Nieboer, Anna P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 32 (03) : 610 - 621
  • [8] Resident behaviour and staff interaction with people with intellectual disabilities and seriously challenging behaviour in residential services
    Felce, D
    Lowe, K
    Blackman, D
    [J]. MENTAL HANDICAP RESEARCH, 1995, 8 (04): : 272 - 295
  • [9] Challenging behaviours: Views and preferences of people with intellectual disabilities
    Wolkorte, Ria
    van Houwelingen, Ingrid
    Kroezen, Marieke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 32 (06) : 1421 - 1427
  • [10] Services for people with mild intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: Service-user views
    Murphy, GH
    Estien, D
    Clare, ICH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 1996, 9 (03) : 256 - 283