FRESF model: An ArcGIS toolbox for rapid assessment of the supply, demand, and flow of flood regulation ecosystem services

被引:10
|
作者
Wanghe, Kunyuan [1 ]
Guo, Xinle [2 ]
Ahmad, Shahid [3 ]
Tian, Fei [1 ]
Nabi, Ghulam [4 ]
Strelnikov, Ivan Igorevich [5 ]
Li, Kemao [6 ]
Zhao, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Plateau Biol, Key Lab Adaptat & Evolut Plateau Biota, Lab Plateau Fish Evolutionary & Funct Genom,Qingha, Xining, Peoples R China
[2] Qinghai Normal Univ, Acad Plateau Sci & Sustainabil, Coll Life Sci, Xining, Peoples R China
[3] Hainan Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm, Haikou, Peoples R China
[4] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Nat Conservat, Krakow, Poland
[5] State Inst Donetsk Bot Garden, Donetsk, Ukraine
[6] QingHai Prov Fishery Environm Monitoring Ctr, QingHai Prov Fishery Technol Extens Ctr, Xining, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
ArcGIS script toolbox; Conservation planning; Flood control; Watershed management; SOIL-EROSION; RISK; CONSERVATION; VEGETATION; RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109264
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
River floods are globally the most damaging and costliest natural disasters. The functions of nonstructural flood mitigation measures (e.g., water retention by vegetation and soil) provide critical regulation ecosystem services to human beings. For example, the Sponge Cities are national watershed management projects in China to increase the nonstructural flood regulation services, aiming to enable the urban ecosystem to absorb, infiltrate, and retain storm water to mitigate pluvial flooding. Decision-makers need to acquire critical areas for the supply, demand, and flow of flood regulation ecosystem services, which would affect the delivery of services and the distribution of any benefits among stakeholders. However, relatively few empirical studies present this information. One reason is the lack of appropriate methods and tools for a rapid assessment of flood regulation ecosystem services that do not require substantial resources or rely heavily on hydrological process data. This article presents the Flood Regulation Ecosystem Service Flow (FRESF) model to address this gap. FRESF is an open-access and open-source ArcGIS script toolbox for an integrated evaluation of flood regulation ecosystem services' supply, demand, and flow. Based on a land surface process model and a generic framework quantifying ecosystem services flow, FRESF provides a rapid and serviceable assessment framework for the relevant ecosystem services at a relatively low cost and effort. The validation results suggest that the outputs are moderately consistent with the actual flood conditions, compared with the flood disaster of the Yangtze River in 2020. Its open codes and flexible inputs imply that ecologists, planners, decision-makers, and developers involved in ecosystem services would have the opportunity to test and apply the FRESF model in several contexts and even contribute further improvements.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification and management of priority regulation areas based on the supply-demand relationship of ecosystem services: A case study of the Loess Plateau
    Ma, Yuhe
    Chen, Hai
    Liu, Di
    Zhang, Jie
    Yang, Miaomiao
    Shi, Jinxin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [42] Revealing the supply-demand relationship of urban cultural ecosystem services: The combination of open-source spatial model and topic model
    Dang, Hui
    Li, Jing
    Zhou, Zixiang
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 167
  • [43] Spatiotemporal assessment of ecosystem services supply-demand relationships to identify ecological management zoning in coastal city Dalian, China
    Yan, Xiaolu
    Liu, Chenghao
    Han, Zenglin
    Li, Xinyuan
    Zhong, Jingqiu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (23) : 63464 - 63478
  • [44] Integrating ecosystem services supply-demand balance into landscape ecological risk and its driving forces assessment in Southwest China
    Li, Weijie
    Kang, Jinwen
    Wang, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 475
  • [45] Scarcity Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services Based on Changes in Supply and Demand: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta City Cluster, China
    Zhou, Xiaoping
    Yang, Lan
    Gu, Xiaokun
    Zhang, Lufa
    Li, Li
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [46] Assessment of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand (Mis)matches for Urban Ecological Management: A Case Study in the Zhengzhou-Kaifeng-Luoyang Cities
    Xue, Dong
    Wang, Zhaojun
    Li, Yuan
    Liu, Mengxue
    Wei, Hejie
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [47] Ecosystem Services' Supply-Demand Assessment and Ecological Management Zoning in Northwest China: A Perspective of the Water-Food-Ecology Nexus
    Zhang, Jiaxin
    Yang, Tao
    Deng, Mingjiang
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [48] Is the 'water tower' reassuring? Viewing water security of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from the perspective of ecosystem services 'supply-flow-demand'
    Liu, Jingya
    Qin, Keyu
    Xie, Gaodi
    Xiao, Yu
    Huang, Mengdong
    Gan, Shuang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [49] Construction of Cultivated Land Ecological Network Based on Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services and MCR Model: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China
    Xu, Yifan
    Liu, Yuepeng
    Sun, Qian
    Qi, Wei
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [50] Spatial matching and value transfer assessment of ecosystem services supply and demand in urban agglomerations: A case study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area in China
    Wu, Juanyu
    Huang, Yuting
    Jiang, Weikang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 375