Risk of Portfolio with Simulated Returns Based on Copula Model

被引:1
|
作者
Ab Razak, Ruzanna [1 ,2 ]
Ismail, Noriszura [2 ]
机构
[1] Multimedia Univ, Fac Management, Quantitat Methods Unit, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Sci & Technol, Sch Math Sci, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Value-at-risk; Copula; return series; TIME-SERIES; DEPENDENCE; MANAGEMENT; PRICES;
D O I
10.1063/1.4907448
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The commonly used tool for measuring risk of a portfolio with equally weighted stocks is variance-covariance method. Under extreme circumstances, this method leads to significant underestimation of actual risk due to its multivariate normality assumption of the joint distribution of stocks. The purpose of this research is to compare the actual risk of portfolio with the simulated risk of portfolio in which the joint distribution of two return series is predetermined. The data used is daily stock prices from the ASEAN market for the period January 2000 to December 2012. The copula approach is applied to capture the time varying dependence among the return series. The results shows that the chosen copula families are not suitable to present the dependence structures of each bivariate returns. Exception for the Philippines-Thailand pair where by t copula distribution appears to be the appropriate choice to depict its dependence. Assuming that the t copula distribution is the joint distribution of each paired series, simulated returns is generated and value-at-risk (VaR) is then applied to evaluate the risk of each portfolio consisting of two simulated return series. The VaR estimates was found to be symmetrical due to the simulation of returns via elliptical copula-GARCH approach. By comparison, it is found that the actual risks are underestimated for all pairs of portfolios except for Philippines-Thailand. This study was able to show that disregard of the non-normal dependence structure of two series will result underestimation of actual risk of the portfolio.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 224
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimating Portfolio of Bonds Credit Risk Value-at-Risk Based on Copula Function
    Bi Tao
    Zhang Xiaofei
    RECENT ADVANCE IN STATISTICS APPLICATION AND RELATED AREAS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1093 - 1097
  • [32] A risk index model for portfolio selection with returns subject to experts’ estimations
    Xiaoxia Huang
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2012, 11 : 451 - 463
  • [33] A risk index model for portfolio selection with returns subject to experts' estimations
    Huang, Xiaoxia
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 11 (04) : 451 - 463
  • [34] Copula Models Comparison for Portfolio Risk Assessment
    Semenov, Mikhail
    Smagulov, Daulet
    GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT: TRANSITION TO ECONOMY 4.0, 2019, : 91 - 102
  • [35] Fast simulation for multifactor portfolio credit risk in the t-copula model
    Kang, WM
    Shahabuddin, P
    Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1-4, 2005, : 1859 - 1868
  • [36] Portfolio optimization model with uncertain returns based on prospect theory
    Li, Yufeng
    Zhou, Bing
    Tan, Yingxue
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2022, 8 (06) : 4529 - 4542
  • [37] Portfolio optimization model with uncertain returns based on prospect theory
    Yufeng Li
    Bing Zhou
    Yingxue Tan
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2022, 8 : 4529 - 4542
  • [38] Estimating hedged portfolio value-at-risk using the conditional copula: An illustration of model risk
    Chen, Yi-Hsuan
    Tu, Anthony H.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2013, 27 : 514 - 528
  • [39] Estimating risk of foreign exchange portfolio: Using VaR and CVaR based on GARCH-EVT-Copula model
    Wang, Zong-Run
    Chen, Xiao-Hong
    Jin, Yan-Bo
    Zhou, Yan-Ju
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 389 (21) : 4918 - 4928
  • [40] Copula-Based Portfolio Credit Risk Assessment in Infrastructure Project Financing
    Dong, Feng
    Chiara, Nicola
    Kokkaew, Nakhon
    Xu, Alex
    JOURNAL OF PRIVATE EQUITY, 2012, 15 (02): : 31 - 40