Cardiovascular safety of lumiracoxib:: A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials ≥1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

被引:46
|
作者
Matchaba, P
Gitton, X
Krammer, G
Ehrsam, E
Sloan, VS
Olson, M
Mellein, B
Hoexter, G
Orloff, J
Garaud, JJ
机构
[1] Nova Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
cardiovascular safety; cyclooxygenase-2; inhibitor; NSAID; osteoarthritis; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.019
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The cardiovascular (CV) safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors has been the subject of considerable debate. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of CV events with lumiracoxib by meta-analysis of all completed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of >= 1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: The Novartis Lumiracoxib Clinical Trial Database, which includes all clinical studies conducted to date with lumiracoxib, was reviewed. Data were extracted from RCTs of >= 1 week and up to 1 year in duration, the maximum study duration; 34,668 patients were included in standard and cumulative meta-analyses. Twenty-two RCTs of lumiracoxib 100 to 1200 mg daily were identified; 22,781 patients were included in 1-year trials. Mean age of the patients was 61.5 years and 74% were female. More than 50% of the patients in these studies had hypertension at baseline and 6% had diabetes. Parameters analyzed were the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) composite CV end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke (Ischemic and hemorrhagic), and CV death; MI alone; and stroke alone. Twenty-one of the 22 RCTs have been published. Results: For all 3 parameters, relative risk (RR) was calculated versus non-naproxen NSAIDs, naproxen, and placebo. The results were as follows: for the APTC end point versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.46-1.51; versus naproxen: RR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.94-2.36; versus placebo: RR 1.08,95% CI, 0.41-2.86; for MI alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.28-2.25; versus naproxen: RR 1.69, 95% CI, 0.82-3.48; versus placebo: RR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.25-6.56; and for stroke alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.35-2.35; versus naproxen: RR 1.42, 95% CI, 0.70-2.91; versus placebo: RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.13-2.74. Cumulative meta-analyses of lumiracoxib versus all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen) did not find any significant differences in APTC, MI alone, or stroke alone. Conclusion: This meta-analysis of 34,668 patients receiving >= 1 week and up to 1 year of treatment found no evidence that lumiracoxib was associated with a significant increase in CV risk compared with naproxen, placebo, or all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen).
引用
收藏
页码:1196 / 1214
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A commentary on 'The efficacy and safety of hydrotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'
    Liu, Chuanpeng
    Jia, Ning
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Yang, Jiaen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (05) : 3110 - 3111
  • [22] Comment on 'The efficacy and safety of hydrotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'
    Zhang, Haitao
    Zeng, Yirong
    Feng, Wenjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (08) : 5136 - 5137
  • [23] The efficacy of probiotic supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Seyed Mohammad Aqaeinezhad Rudbane
    Samane Rahmdel
    Seyedeh Maryam Abdollahzadeh
    Morteza Zare
    Azam Bazrafshan
    Seyed Mohammad Mazloomi
    Inflammopharmacology, 2018, 26 : 67 - 76
  • [24] The efficacy of probiotic supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Rudbane, Seyed Mohammad Aqaeinezhad
    Rahmdel, Samane
    Abdollahzadeh, Seyedeh Maryam
    Zare, Morteza
    Bazrafshan, Azam
    Mazloomi, Seyed Mohammad
    INFLAMMOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 26 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [25] Efficacy of resistance exercises in rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Baillet, Athan
    Vaillant, Mathieu
    Guinot, Michel
    Juvin, Robert
    Gaudin, Philippe
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (03) : 519 - 527
  • [26] SAFETY OF GLUCOCORTICOIDS FOR EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Mitrovic, S.
    Fardet, L.
    Vatier, C.
    Barnetche, T.
    Schaeverbeke, T.
    Gaujoux-Viala, C.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 : 228 - 228
  • [27] Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Therapy in Osteoarthritis A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu, Chao
    Gu, Ke
    Yasen, Yalikun
    Hou, Yanjie
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (20)
  • [28] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and filgotinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Y. H.
    Song, G. G.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 79 (06): : 590 - 603
  • [29] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Young Ho
    Song, Gwan Gyu
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2024, 83 (SUPPL 1): : 107 - 114
  • [30] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and olokizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ho Lee, Young
    Gyu Song, Gwan
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2024, 83 (SUPPL 1): : 97 - 106