Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stone management: Retrospective study

被引:2
|
作者
Palmero, X. [1 ,2 ]
Balssa, L. [1 ]
Bernardini, S. [1 ]
Chabannes, E. [1 ]
Guichard, G. [1 ]
Bittard, H. [1 ,2 ]
Kleinclauss, F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHRU Jean Minjoz, Serv Urol & Transplantat Renale, 3 Blvd Fleming, F-25030 Besancon, France
[2] Univ Franche Comte, UFR Sci Med & Pharmaceut, F-25030 Besancon, France
[3] INSERM, UMR 1098, Besancon, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2016年 / 26卷 / 09期
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Ureterorenoscopy; Renal stone; Stone free rate; Postoperative Complication; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; KIDNEY-STONES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; URETEROSCOPY; MORBIDITY; CALCULI;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2016.07.299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of renal stone fragmentation by flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS), compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Material and methods. Patients treated between 1998 and 2010 by URS and PCNL for intrarenal stone were reviewed. Patients' and stones' characteristics were analyzed. The preoperative parameters were reported as well as the procedure's efficiency and its complications. Success was defined by the absence of residual lithiasis visualized on renal imaging at 6 months of follow-up. Results. Among 531 patients included, there were 159 PCNL and 372 URS. The mean duration of hospitalization after PCNL was 8 4.6 days and 3 1.7 days after URS. The mean stones' size was higher in the PCNL group (19.9 7.5 mm) than for the URS group (9.7 5.6 mm; P< 0.0001). The stone-free rate was significantly better in the PCNL group for stones measuring between 10 and 20 mm (P < 0.0001) and for stones of more than 20 mm (P= 0.017). Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent (27 %) and more severe (8.8 % vs Clavien III and IV) in the PCNL, than in the URS group, respectively (P=0.0001). Conclusion. PCNL is a successful technique for renal stone fragmentation. However, URS seemed more tolerated despite a lower stone-free rate. Level of evidence. 4. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 centimeters: a retrospective study
    He, Qinghua
    Wei, Xuedong
    Wu, Eran
    Luo, Raoshan
    Yu, Lizhi
    Liang, Weiming
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [22] The visual percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus the conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment for renal stone
    Zhang, Baochao
    Xie, Haijie
    Hu, Yude
    Liu, Chunyu
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (06) : 627 - 635
  • [23] Comparative study of the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones with miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in obese patients
    Chen, He-Qun
    Chen, Zhi-Yong
    Zeng, Feng
    Li, Yang
    Yang, Zhong-Qing
    He, Cheng
    He, Yao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (08) : 1309 - 1314
  • [24] A randomized comparative study of flexible ureterorenoscopy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones 2 cm or less
    Darwish, Amr E.
    Moneim, Alaa E. Abdel
    Ahmed, Abdelfatah I.
    Hamdy, Seif M.
    Abolella, Hassan A.
    Reda, Ahmed
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2024, 18 (04) : 273 - 277
  • [25] Flexible ureterorenoscopy (RIRS) vs. Mini- percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MINI-PCNL) for renal stones 20-30 mm a prospective randomized study
    Sebaey, Ahmed
    Abou Taleb, Ahmed
    Elbashir, Salah
    Gomaa, Rabie
    Elshazli, Ali
    Saber, Wael
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 28 (01)
  • [26] Treatment of Complex Renal Calculi by Digital Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Combined with Single-Tract Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone Position: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Huayu
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Yunchao
    Li, Kai
    Du, Wenzhi
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Wang, Jianning
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 5878 - 5885
  • [27] Flexible Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones
    Zong, Dapeng
    Shao, Pengfei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 20 (04) : 593 - 601
  • [28] COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOWER CALYCEAL RENAL STONE
    Jang, H. A.
    Lee, J. G.
    Moon, D. G.
    Kang, J., I
    Kang, S. G.
    Ko, Y. H.
    Cheon, J.
    Kang, S. H.
    Kim, J. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 94 - 95
  • [29] LOWER POLE RENAL STONE MANAGEMENT USING FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY WITH HOLMIUM LASER (MULTI-CENTRIC STUDY)
    Alqahtani, Saeed
    Thomas, Alexandre
    de Medina, Sixtina Gil Diez
    Lechavellier, Eric
    Chabanne, Eric
    Bensalah, Karim
    Carpentier, Xavier
    Traxer, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E624 - E624
  • [30] LOWER POLE RENAL STONE MANAGEMENT USING FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY WITH HOLMIUM LASER (MULTI-CENTRIC STUDY)
    Alqahtani, S.
    Thomas, A.
    de Medina, S. Gil Diez
    Lechevallier, E.
    Bensalah, K.
    Chabanne, E.
    Carpentier, X.
    Traxer, O.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A226 - A226