Embryo survival and birth rate after minimum volume vitrification or slow freezing of in vivo and in vitro produced ovine embryos

被引:25
|
作者
dos Santos-Neto, P. C. [1 ,2 ]
Cuadro, F. [1 ,2 ]
Barrera, N. [1 ]
Crispo, M. [3 ]
Menchaca, A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRAUy, Inst Reprod Anim Uruguay, Camino Cruz Sur, Montevideo 2250, Uruguay
[2] Univ La Republ, Fac Vet, Programa Posgrad, Av Lasplaces, Montevideo 1550, Uruguay
[3] Inst Pasteur Montevideo, Unidad Anim Transgen & Experimentac, Montevideo 2020, Uruguay
关键词
Sheep; Lambs; IVP; In vitro fertilization; Cryotolerance; Ethylene glycol; DMSO; HIGHLY EFFICIENT VITRIFICATION; VITRIFIED SHEEP EMBRYOS; HUMAN OOCYTES; SMALL RUMINANTS; CRYOPRESERVATION; BLASTOCYSTS; VIABILITY; CULTURE; FERTILIZATION; CRYOTOP;
D O I
10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.08.002
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objective was to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and birth rate of in vivo derived vs. in vitro produced ovine embryos submitted to different cryopreservation methods. A total of 197 in vivo and 240 in vitro produced embryos were cryopreserved either by conventional freezing, or by vitrification with Cryotop or Spatula MVD methods on Day 6 after insemination/fertilization. After thawing/warming and transfer, embryo survival rate on Day 30 of gestation was affected by the source of the embryos (in vivo 53.3%, in vitro 20.8%; P < 0.05) and by the method of cryopreservation (conventional freezing 26.5%, Cryotop 52.0%, Spatula MVD 22.2%; P < 0.05). For in vivo derived embryos, survival rate after embryo transfer was 45.6% for conventional freezing, 67.1% for Cryotop, and 40.4% for Spatula MVD. For in vitro produced embryos, survival rate was 7.3% for conventional freezing, 38.7% for Cryotop, and 11.4% for Spatula MVD. Fetal loss from Day 30 to birth showed a tendency to be greater for in vitro (15.0%) rather than for in vivo produced embryos (5.7%), and was not affected by the cryopreservation method. Gestation length, weight at birth and lamb survival rate after birth were not affected by the source of the embryo, the cryopreservation method or stage of development (average: 150.5 +/- 1.8 days; 4232.8 +/- 102.8 g; 85.4%; respectively). This study demonstrates that embryo survival and birth rate of both in vivo and in vitro produced ovine embryos are improved by vitrification with the minimum volume Cryotop method. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 14
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Developmental rates of in vivo and in vitro produced bovine embryos cryopreserved in ethylene glycol based solutions by slow freezing or solid surface vitrification
    Rodriguez Villamil, P.
    Lozano, D.
    Oviedo, J. M.
    Ongaratto, F. L.
    Bo, G. A.
    [J]. ANIMAL REPRODUCTION, 2012, 9 (02) : 86 - 92
  • [22] SURVIVAL INVITRO OF BOVINE DEMI-EMBRYOS AFTER FREEZING BY SLOW COOLING RATES OR VITRIFICATION
    BIELANSKI, A
    HARE, WCD
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 1988, 29 (01) : 223 - 223
  • [23] Embryo survival and recipient pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh or vitrified, in vivo or in vitro produced ovine blastocysts
    Papadopoulos, S
    Rizos, D
    Duffy, P
    Wade, M
    Quinn, K
    Boland, MP
    Lonergan, P
    [J]. ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2002, 74 (1-2) : 35 - 44
  • [24] Coculture of monkey ovarian tissue increases survival after vitrification and slow-rate freezing
    Yeoman, RR
    Wolf, DP
    Lee, DM
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 : 1248 - 1254
  • [25] In vitro survival of in vivo-derived porcine embryos after re-vitrification
    Cuello, C.
    Nohalez, A.
    Martinez, C. A.
    Gomis, J.
    Alminana, C.
    Angel, M. A.
    Parilla, I.
    Gil, M. A.
    Roca, J.
    Martinez, E. A.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2014, 49 : 124 - 124
  • [26] COMPARISON OF 2-STEP VITRIFICATION VERSUS CONTROLLED FREEZING ON SURVIVAL OF IN-VITRO PRODUCED CATTLE EMBRYOS
    MAHMOUDZADEH, AR
    VANSOOM, A
    YSEBAERT, MT
    DEKRUIF, A
    [J]. THERIOGENOLOGY, 1994, 42 (08) : 1389 - 1397
  • [27] SURVIVAL RATE AND IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF IN VIVO-PRODUCED AND CRYOPRESERVED DOG EMBRYOS
    Luz, M. R.
    Holanda, C. C.
    Pereira, J. J.
    Teixeira, N. S.
    Vantini, R.
    Freitas, P. M. C.
    Salgado, A. E. P.
    Oliveira, S. B.
    Guaitolini, C. R. F.
    Santos, M. C.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 22 (01) : 208 - 209
  • [28] Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos
    Valojerdi, Mojtaba Rezazadeh
    Eftekhari-Yazdi, Poopak
    Karimian, Leila
    Hassani, Fatemeh
    Movaghar, Bahar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2009, 26 (06) : 347 - 354
  • [29] Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos
    Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi
    Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi
    Leila Karimian
    Fatemeh Hassani
    Bahar Movaghar
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2009, 26 : 347 - 354
  • [30] DEVELOPMENT OF IN VITRO-PRODUCED CAT EMBRYOS AFTER VITRIFICATION AND NONSURGICAL EMBRYO TRANSFER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
    Iacono, E.
    Merlo, B.
    Regazzini, M.
    Zambelli, D.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 21 (01) : 133 - 133