Productive Performance, Egg Characteristics and Hatching Traits of Three Chicken Genotypes under Free-Range, Semi-intensive, and Intensive Housing Systems

被引:7
|
作者
Ahmad, S. [1 ]
Mahmud, A. [1 ]
Hussain, J. [1 ]
Javed, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vet & Anim Sci, Fac Anim Prod & Technol, Dept Poultry Prod, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
[2] Univ Vet & Anim Sci, Fac Anim Prod & Technol, Dept Livestock Prod, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
关键词
Crossbred chickens; egg quality; hatching traits; housing system; live performance; ASEEL CHICKEN; QUALITY; BROILER; WELFARE; OUTDOOR; HENS;
D O I
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0935
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of housing system on the live performance, egg quality, and hatching traits of three dual-purpose chicken genotypes. In total, 180 birds, comprising 48 pullets and 12 cockerels from each of three genotypes, were evaluated during the production phase (27-46 weeks). For this, 144 pullets and 36 cockerels were randomly picked from 18 treatment block groups were shifted to breeding coops, allotting 4 pullets to one cockerel. A completely randomized complete block design (RCBD) was employed. Three genotypes, purebred Naked Neck (NN) and two crosses Rhode Island Red x Naked Neck (RIR x NN = RNN) and Black Australorp x Naked Neck (BAL x NN = BNN), were compared. Intensive system (p<0.0001) and BNN hens (p<0.0001) were heavier on week 26 and 46. Higher egg production (p<0.0001) was obtained in the intensive system and in BNN hens (p<0.0001). Hens maintained in the intensive systems produced heavier eggs and higher egg mass (p<0.0001), and RNN and BNN hens laid heavier eggs (p<0.0001) while higher egg mass (p<0.0001) was found in BNN hens. Higher egg shape index (initial, p=0.0002), egg surface area (initial, p<0.0001; final, p<0.0001), egg volume (initial, p<0.0001; final, p<0.0001) and Haugh unit score (initial, p=0.0002; final, p=<0.0001) were obtained in RNN and BNN hens. At the end of the experiment (46 weeks), higher yolk index (p=0.0004) was found in RNN and BNN eggs, and thicker eggshells (p<0.0001) in RNN eggs. Higher egg hatchability was obtained in the free-range system (p<0.0001) and in the RNN genotype (p<0.0001). The highest fertility rates were detected in the free-range system (p<0.0001), and in the RNN and BNN genotypes (p<0.0001). The lowest infertile egg rates were observed in the free-range system (p<0.0001) and in RNN and BNN genotypes (p<0.0001). The lowest dead-in-shell rate was calculated for the free-range system (p=0.0456). In conclusion, free-range and semi intensive system largely influence productive performance, egg quality and hatching traits. Regarding genotypes, RNN and BNN crossbred hens perform better than NN purebreds.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Behavioural assessment of three chicken genotypes under free-range, semi-intensive, and intensive housing systems
    Ahmad, Sohail
    Mahmud, Athar
    Hussain, Jibran
    Javed, Khalid
    Usman, Muhammad
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Zaid, Muhammad
    [J]. ANKARA UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2021, 68 (04): : 365 - 372
  • [2] Morphometric Traits, Serum Chemistry and Antibody Response of Three Chicken Genotypes under Free-Range, Semi-Intensive and Intensive Housing Systems
    Ahmad, S.
    Mahmud, A.
    Hussain, J.
    Javed, K.
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [3] Morphological and carcass traits of three chicken genotypes under free-range, semiintensive, and intensive housing systems
    Ahmad, Sohail
    Mahmud, Athar
    Hussain, Jibran
    Javed, Khalid
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2019, 43 (03): : 342 - 352
  • [4] PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF ASEEL CHICKEN UNDER FREE RANGE, SEMI-INTENSIVE AND CONFINEMENT REARING SYSTEMS
    Rehman, M. S.
    Mahmud, A.
    Mehmood, S.
    Pasha, T. N.
    Javed, K.
    Hussain, J.
    Khan, M. T.
    [J]. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 2016, 26 (06): : 1589 - 1596
  • [5] Behavioral Repertoire of Commercial Layers Under Free Range, Semi-Intensive and Intensive Rearing Systems
    Mahmud, A.
    Husnain, A.
    Mehmood, S.
    Javed, K.
    Khan, M.
    Ahmad, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 16 - 17
  • [6] Carcass traits of Muzaffarnagari lambs under intensive and semi-intensive management systems
    Pal, UK
    Agnihotri, MK
    Sinha, NK
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1997, 67 (08): : 720 - 722
  • [7] Blood biochemistry and immune response in Aseel chicken under free range, semi-intensive, and confinement rearing systems
    Rehman, M. S.
    Mahmud, A.
    Mehmood, S.
    Pasha, T. N.
    Hussain, J.
    Khan, M. T.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2017, 96 (01) : 226 - 233
  • [8] Growth, slaughter and gastrointestinal tract traits of three turkey genotypes under barn and free-range housing systems
    Sarica, M.
    Ocak, N.
    Karacay, N.
    Yamak, U.
    Kop, C.
    Altop, A.
    [J]. BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (04) : 487 - 494
  • [9] Strains of free-range broilers reared in semi-intensive system in a hot climate region
    Dias, Adelio Nunes
    Maciel, Monica Patricia
    de Oliveira Aiura, Auriclecia Lopes
    Correa Arouca, Claudio Luiz
    Silva, Daiane Batista
    Santana de Moura, Vitor Hugo
    [J]. PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 51 (12) : 2010 - 2017
  • [10] Raw pigeon pea in the diet of free-range broilers reared in a semi-intensive system
    Alencar, Dalila Polyana
    Maciel, Monica Patricia
    Rocha Botelho, Luiz Fernando
    Caldeira, Luciana Albuquerque
    Martins Souza, Luiz Felipe
    Silva, Daiane Batista
    Santana de Moura, Vitor Hugo
    [J]. PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2014, 49 (09) : 737 - 744