Researchers' opinions towards the communication of results of biobank research: a survey study

被引:14
|
作者
Meulenkamp, Tineke M. [1 ]
Gevers, Sjef J. K. [2 ]
Bovenberg, Jasper A. [2 ]
Smets, Ellen M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Social Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
biobanks; genetic databases; disclosing results; researchers' opinions; RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; INFORMED-CONSENT; ATTITUDES; GENOMICS; DUTY;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2011.216
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Eighty Dutch investigators (response 41%) involved in biobank research responded to a web-based survey addressing communication of results of biobank research to individual participants. Questions addressed their opinion towards an obligation to communicate results and related issues such as ownership of blood samples, privacy, therapeutic relationship, costs and implications for participants. Most researchers (74%) indicated that participants only have to be informed when results have implications for treatment or prevention. Researchers were generally not inclined to provide more feedback to patients as compared with healthy participants, nor were they inclined to provide feedback in return for participants' contribution to the biobank. Our results demonstrate major and significant differences in opinion about the feedback of individual results within the community of biobank researchers. European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 258-262; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.216; published online 30 November 2011
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 262
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Publication of nonsignificant results: A survey of psychologists' opinions
    Reysen, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2006, 98 (01) : 169 - 175
  • [22] Biobank Research: Reporting Results to Individual Participants
    Bovenberg, Jasper
    Meulenkamp, Tineke
    Smets, Ellen
    Gevers, Sjef
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2009, 16 (03) : 229 - 247
  • [23] Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey
    MacNeil, S. Danielle
    Fernandez, Conrad V.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2007, 33 (09) : 549 - 553
  • [24] Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia
    Fleming, J.
    Critchley, C.
    Otlowski, M.
    Stewart, C.
    Kerridge, I.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2015, 45 (12) : 1274 - 1279
  • [25] A mixed-methods study to explore opinions of research translation held by researchers working in a Centre of Research Excellence in Australia
    Lynch, Elizabeth A.
    Ramanathan, Shanthi A.
    Middleton, Sandy
    Bernhardt, Julie
    Nilsson, Michael
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [26] Caregivers' perceptions towards communication with mechanically ventilated patients: The results of a multicenter survey
    IJssennagger, C. E.
    Ten Hoorn, S.
    Van Wijk, A.
    Van den Broek, J. M.
    Girbes, A. R.
    Tuinman, P. R.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 48 : 263 - 268
  • [27] Opinions on research involving human embryo models by researchers and the general public
    Yui, Hideki
    Yashiro, Yoshimi
    Muto, Kaori
    Watanabe, Saori
    Kiya, Yukitaka
    Inoue, Yusuke
    Yamagata, Zentaro
    REGENERATIVE THERAPY, 2024, 26 : 9 - 13
  • [28] Neonatologists' opinions about the 'foreseeable risks' in comparative effectiveness research: Results from an online survey
    Feltman, D. M.
    Lantos, J. D.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 37 (03) : 311 - 314
  • [29] Argentinian researchers' opinions and habits regarding open access publishing. A study based on the SOAP survey data
    Bongiovani, Paola
    Diana Gomez, Nancy
    Miguel, Sandra
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2012, 35 (03): : 453 - 467
  • [30] Neonatologists’ opinions about the ‘foreseeable risks’ in comparative effectiveness research: Results from an online survey
    D M Feltman
    J D Lantos
    Journal of Perinatology, 2017, 37 : 311 - 314