Performance analysis of novel methods for detecting epistasis

被引:54
|
作者
Shang, Junliang [1 ]
Zhang, Junying [1 ]
Sun, Yan [2 ]
Liu, Dan [1 ]
Ye, Daojun [1 ]
Yin, Yaling [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xidian Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Xian 710071, Peoples R China
[2] Shannxi Peoples Fine Arts Publishing House, Xian 710003, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Econ & Financial Univ, Informat Sch, Xian 710100, Peoples R China
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2011年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MULTIFACTOR-DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; GENE-GENE INTERACTIONS; ASSOCIATION; INFERENCE; POWER;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-12-475
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Epistasis is recognized fundamentally important for understanding the mechanism of disease-causing genetic variation. Though many novel methods for detecting epistasis have been proposed, few studies focus on their comparison. Undertaking a comprehensive comparison study is an urgent task and a pathway of the methods to real applications. Results: This paper aims at a comparison study of epistasis detection methods through applying related software packages on datasets. For this purpose, we categorize methods according to their search strategies, and select five representative methods (TEAM, BOOST, SNPRuler, AntEpiSeeker and epiMODE) originating from different underlying techniques for comparison. The methods are tested on simulated datasets with different size, various epistasis models, and with/without noise. The types of noise include missing data, genotyping error and phenocopy. Performance is evaluated by detection power (three forms are introduced), robustness, sensitivity and computational complexity. Conclusions: None of selected methods is perfect in all scenarios and each has its own merits and limitations. In terms of detection power, AntEpiSeeker performs best on detecting epistasis displaying marginal effects (eME) and BOOST performs best on identifying epistasis displaying no marginal effects (eNME). In terms of robustness, AntEpiSeeker is robust to all types of noise on eME models, BOOST is robust to genotyping error and phenocopy on eNME models, and SNPRuler is robust to phenocopy on eME models and missing data on eNME models. In terms of sensitivity, AntEpiSeeker is the winner on eME models and both SNPRuler and BOOST perform well on eNME models. In terms of computational complexity, BOOST is the fastest among the methods. In terms of overall performance, AntEpiSeeker and BOOST are recommended as the efficient and effective methods. This comparison study may provide guidelines for applying the methods and further clues for epistasis detection.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Challenge of Detecting Epistasis (G x G Interactions): Genetic Analysis Workshop 16
    An, Ping
    Mukherjee, Odity
    Chanda, Pritam
    Yao, Li
    Engelman, Corinne D.
    Huang, Chien-Hsun
    Zheng, Tian
    Kovac, Ilija P.
    Dube, Marie-Pierre
    Liang, Xueying
    Li, Jia
    de Andrade, Mariza
    Culverhouse, Robert
    Malzahn, Doerthe
    Manning, Alisa K.
    Clarke, Geraldine M.
    Jung, Jeesun
    Province, Michael A.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 : S58 - S67
  • [22] Computational methods dedicated to diabetes identification through epistasis analysis: a review
    Manavalan, R.
    Priya, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2020, 8 (03) : 239 - 261
  • [23] Novel methods for detecting buried explosive devices
    Kercel, SW
    Burlage, RS
    Patek, DR
    Smith, CM
    Hibbs, AD
    Rayner, TJ
    DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS II, 1997, 3079 : 467 - 477
  • [24] Study on Indoor Detecting Methods and Performance of Shotcrete
    Shi Yan
    Li Jiazheng
    Yan Jianjun
    Peng Shangshi
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS AND MATERIALS PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2013, 652-654 : 1217 - 1220
  • [25] Detecting genetic epistasis by differential departure from independence
    Sharma, Ruby
    Sadeghian Tehrani, Zeinab
    Kumar, Sajal
    Song, Mingzhou
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2022, 297 (04) : 911 - 924
  • [26] A Recommendation Systems Approach for Detecting Epistasis in Genomic Signals
    Banuelos, Mario
    Hernandez, Marissa
    2021 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA ASC), 2021, : 1277 - 1280
  • [27] Detecting Epistasis in the Presence of Linkage Disequilibrium: A Focused Comparison
    Ibrahim, Zina M.
    Newhouse, Stephen
    Dobson, Richard
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN BIOINFORMATICS AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY (CIBCB), 2013, : 96 - 103
  • [28] Detecting genetic epistasis by differential departure from independence
    Ruby Sharma
    Zeinab Sadeghian Tehrani
    Sajal Kumar
    Mingzhou Song
    Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2022, 297 : 911 - 924
  • [29] A Novel Ensemble Model BharatAuthenticNet for Detecting Fake News: Experimentation and Performance Analysis
    Singh, Manish Kumar
    Ahmed, Jawed
    Raghuvanshi, Kamlesh Kumar
    Alam, Mohammad Afshar
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025,
  • [30] Novel quality control methods in conjunction with chemometrics (multivariate analysis) for detecting honey authenticity
    Arvanitoyannis, IS
    Chalhoub, C
    Gotsiou, P
    Lydakis-Simantiris, N
    Kefalas, P
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2005, 45 (03) : 193 - 203