Shear-Wave Elastography of Benign versus Malignant Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Masses: Comparison with Conventional US and MRI

被引:29
|
作者
Tavare, Aniket N. [1 ]
Alfuraih, Abdulrahman M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hensor, Elizabeth M. A. [2 ,4 ]
Astrinakis, Emmanouil [1 ]
Gupta, Harun [1 ]
Robinson, Philip [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Teaching Hosp Trust, Chapel Allerton Hosp, Musculoskeletal Ctr X Ray Dept, Leeds LS7 4SA, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Biomed Res Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz Univ, Radiol & Med Imaging Dept, Coll Appl Med Sci, Kharj, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Rheumat & Musculoskeletal Med, Chapel Allerton Hosp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
BREAST MASSES; ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; SONOELASTOGRAPHY; TUMORS; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2018180950
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine if shear-wave elastography (SWE) improves the accuracy of diagnosing soft-tissue masses as benign or malignant compared with US alone or in combination with MRI. Materials and Methods: Two hundred six consecutive adult participants (mean age, 57.7 years; range, 18-91 years), including 89 men (median age, 56.0 years; range, 21-91 years) and 117 women (median age, 59.1 years; range, 18-88 years), who were referred for biopsy of a soft-tissue mass were prospectively recruited from December 2015 through March 2017. Participants underwent B-mode US, MRI, and SWE prior to biopsy. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed US images alone, followed by US and MRI images together, and classified lesions as benign, probably benign, probably malignant, or malignant. For SWE, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated for transverse shear-wave velocity (SWV). Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association between SWE and malignancy alongside individual demographic and imaging variables. Results: At histologic examination, 79 of 206 (38%) participants had malignant lesions. SWV showed good diagnostic accuracy for lesions classified as benign or probably benign by US alone (AUC = 0.87 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.79, 0.95]). SWV did not provide substantive diagnostic information for lesions classified as probably malignant or malignant, whether the classification was made with or without MRI. However, multivariable modeling indicated that diagnostic accuracy may vary by lesion position (interaction P =.02; superficial, odds ratio [OR] = 17.7 [95% CI: 1.50, 207], P =.02; deep/mixed, OR = 0.24 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.86], P =.03) and participant age (interaction P =.01; eg, age 43 years, OR = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.15, 3.5], P =.69; age 72 years, OR = 0.08 [95% CI: 0.02, 0.37], P =.001). Conclusion: Shear-wave elastography can increase accuracy of soft-tissue lesion diagnosis in conjunction with US. However, a single cut-off may not be universally applicable with diagnostic accuracy that is affected by lesion position and patient age. (c) RSNA, 2018
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 417
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The diagnostic value of ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors
    Ozturk, Mesut
    Selcuk, Mustafa Bekir
    Polat, Ahmet Veysel
    Ozbalci, Aysu Basak
    Baris, Yakup Sancar
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (11) : 1795 - 1805
  • [22] The diagnostic value of ultrasound and shear wave elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant soft tissue tumors
    Mesut Ozturk
    Mustafa Bekir Selcuk
    Ahmet Veysel Polat
    Aysu Basak Ozbalci
    Yakup Sancar Baris
    Skeletal Radiology, 2020, 49 : 1795 - 1805
  • [23] Machine learning-based discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions on US: The contribution of shear-wave elastography
    La Rocca, Ludovica Rita
    Caruso, Martina
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Rocco, Nicola
    Pellegrino, Tommaso
    Russo, Daniela
    Salatiello, Maria
    de Giorgio, Andrea
    Pastore, Roberta
    Maurea, Simone
    Brunetti, Arturo
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Romeo, Valeria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181
  • [24] Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance
    Choi, H. Y.
    Sohn, Y. -M.
    Seo, M.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (10) : 878 - 886
  • [25] Diagnostic role of shear wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses
    Sravani, Nichanametla
    Ramesh, Ananthakrishnan
    Sureshkumar, Sathasivam
    Vijayakumar, Chellappa
    Abdulbasith, K. M.
    Balasubramanian, Gopal
    Toi, Pampa Ch
    SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01):
  • [26] Performance of Shear Wave Elastography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Solid Breast Masses
    Li, Guiling
    Li, De-Wei
    Fang, Yu-Xiao
    Song, Yi-Jiang
    Deng, Zhu-Jun
    Gao, Jian
    Xie, Yan
    Yin, Tian-Sheng
    Ying, Li
    Tang, Kai-Fu
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [27] Hepatic Fibrosis: Prospective Comparison of MR Elastography and US Shear-Wave Elastography for Evaluation
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Eun Sun
    Sohn, Ji Young
    Jang, Suk Ki
    Lee, Kyung Bun
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (03) : 772 - 782
  • [28] Development of a risk assessment model to differentiate malignant and benign musculoskeletal soft-tissue masses on magnetic resonance imaging
    Obaid, Haron
    Vassos, Nicholas
    Adams, Scott J.
    Bryce, Rhonda
    Donuru, Achala
    Sinclair, Nicolette
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [29] Diagnostic value of strain elastography for differentiating benign and malignant soft tissue masses
    Li, Shilin
    Liu, Lingfang
    Lv, Guorong
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (02) : 2041 - 2044
  • [30] Inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of shear wave elastography measurements for musculoskeletal soft tissue masses
    Jonathan Nicholls
    Abdulrahman M. Alfuraih
    Elizabeth M. A. Hensor
    Philip Robinson
    Skeletal Radiology, 2020, 49 : 779 - 786