Optimizing Patient Selection for Irreversible Electroporation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Analyses of Survival

被引:9
|
作者
Woeste, Matthew R. [1 ]
Wilson, Khaleel D. [1 ]
Kruse, Edward J. [2 ]
Weiss, Matthew J. [3 ]
Christein, John D. [4 ]
White, Rebekah R. [5 ]
Martin, Robert C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Moores Canc Ctr, Gastrointestinal Canc Unit, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 11卷
关键词
locally advanced pancreatic cancer; irreversible electroporation (IRE); overall survival; patient selection; recurrence; progression free survival; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; DIABETES-MELLITUS; PLUS RADIOTHERAPY; TUMOR ABLATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; BORDERLINE; THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; FOLFIRINOX;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.817220
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE. MethodsA multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses. Results187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 - 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age <= 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p<0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age <= 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p<0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE. ConclusionsAge, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Initial experience of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer in a Korean population
    Kwon, Joon Ho
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Namo
    Bang, Seungmin
    Kim, Man-Deuk
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [32] Initial experience in irreversible electroporation for the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer
    Moir, J. A. G.
    Tsirlis, T.
    Littler, P.
    Sumpter, K.
    Jones, M.
    Duncan, H.
    White, S. A.
    French, J. J.
    Manas, D. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 22 - 22
  • [33] Concurrent chemotherapy alone versus irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Belfiore, Giuseppe
    Belfiore, Maria Paola
    Reginelli, Alfonso
    Capasso, Raffaella
    Romano, Francesco
    Ianniello, Giovanni Pietro
    Cappabianca, Salvatore
    Brunese, Luca
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (03)
  • [34] Survival Comparison of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Irreversible Electroporation Versus Conversional Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    He, Chaobin
    Sun, Shuxin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yu
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Li, Shengping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [35] Concurrent chemotherapy alone versus irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Giuseppe Belfiore
    Maria Paola Belfiore
    Alfonso Reginelli
    Raffaella Capasso
    Francesco Romano
    Giovanni Pietro Ianniello
    Salvatore Cappabianca
    Luca Brunese
    Medical Oncology, 2017, 34
  • [36] Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic neck/body adenocarcinoma
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [37] Irreversible Electroporation Therapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    McFarland, Kelli
    Ellis, Susan
    Velanovich, Vic
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (03) : 361 - 369
  • [38] An update on the role of irreversible electroporation in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    HPB, 2016, 18 (10) : 791 - 792
  • [39] Irreversible electroporation and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma
    Xu, Kai
    Chen, Yongliang
    Su, Junjun
    Su, Ming
    Yan, Li
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (02) : 280 - +
  • [40] Systematic Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Machairas, Nikolaos
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Ejaz, Aslam
    Weiss, Matthew
    Hasemaki, Natasha
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 1657 - 1668