共 50 条
Optimizing Patient Selection for Irreversible Electroporation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Analyses of Survival
被引:9
|作者:
Woeste, Matthew R.
[1
]
Wilson, Khaleel D.
[1
]
Kruse, Edward J.
[2
]
Weiss, Matthew J.
[3
]
Christein, John D.
[4
]
White, Rebekah R.
[5
]
Martin, Robert C. G.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Moores Canc Ctr, Gastrointestinal Canc Unit, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源:
关键词:
locally advanced pancreatic cancer;
irreversible electroporation (IRE);
overall survival;
patient selection;
recurrence;
progression free survival;
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL;
DIABETES-MELLITUS;
PLUS RADIOTHERAPY;
TUMOR ABLATION;
ADENOCARCINOMA;
BORDERLINE;
THERAPY;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
GEMCITABINE;
FOLFIRINOX;
D O I:
10.3389/fonc.2021.817220
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
BackgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE. MethodsA multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses. Results187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 - 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age <= 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p<0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age <= 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p<0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE. ConclusionsAge, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文