The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis

被引:54
|
作者
Baron, Murray [1 ]
Schieir, Orit [1 ]
Hudson, Marie [1 ]
Steele, Russell [1 ]
Kolahi, Sousan [2 ]
Berkson, Laeora [1 ]
Couture, Francois [1 ]
Fitzcharles, M. A. [1 ]
Gagne, Michel [1 ]
Garfield, Bruce [1 ]
Gutkowski, Andrzej [1 ]
Kang, Harb [1 ]
Kapusta, Morton [1 ]
Ligier, Sophie [3 ]
Mathieu, Jean-Pierre [3 ]
Menard, Henri [1 ]
Starr, Michael [1 ]
Stein, Michael [1 ]
Zummer, Michel [3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Azarbaijan, Iran
[3] Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, Montreal, PQ H1T 2M4, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1002/art.23314
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To assess the clinimetric properties of a new health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II), in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Methods. Internal consistency as well as criterion, construct, and discriminative validity of the WHODAS II were assessed in 172 patients with early inflammatory arthritis who completed the WHODAS II, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), and other measures of disease severity, functioning, pain, depression, and resource use. Test-retest reliability of the WHODAS II was assessed by having a subset of 20 patients complete the WHODAS II a second time, 1 week after the first assessment. Results. The WHODAS II had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96 for patients working or in school and 0.93 for patients not working or in school). Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients of the WHODAS II total score and subscales ranged from 0.82-0.96. The WHODAS II total score was strongly correlated with the SF-36 physical component score (Kendall's tau-b 0.51, P < 0.001) and moderately correlated with the SF-36 mental component score (tau-b 0.43, P < 0.001). WHODAS II correlations with disease outcomes ranged from Kendall's tau-b 0.15-0.55. The WHODAS II significantly differentiated between every aspect of disease severity assessed with the exception of measures of health resource use. Conclusion. The WHODAS II is a valid and reliable measure of HRQOL in cross-sectional studies of patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Research is still required to investigate potential item redundancy and determine its usefulness in longitudinal studies.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 390
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review
    Federici, Stefano
    Bracalenti, Marco
    Meloni, Fabio
    Luciano, Juan V.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (23) : 2347 - 2380
  • [22] Diabetes and disability - a latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Seet, V.
    Abdin, E.
    Jeyagurunathan, A.
    Tan, S. C.
    Lee, E. S.
    Vaingankar, J.
    Chong, S. A.
    Subramaniam, M.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 197
  • [23] Measuring functional health among the elderly: development of the Japanese version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II
    Tazaki, Miyako
    Yamaguchi, Tesuo
    Yatsunami, Mitsutoshi
    Nakane, Yoshibumi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [24] Clinical correlates of quality of life in systemic sclerosis measured with the world health organization disability assessment schedule II
    Hudson, Marie
    Thombs, Brett D.
    Steele, Russell
    Watterson, Rita
    Taillefer, Suzanne
    Baron, Murray
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (02): : 279 - 284
  • [25] Correspondence: Functioning assessment by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-WHODAS
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 67 (01) : 72 - 72
  • [26] Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders
    Buist-Bouwman, M. A.
    Ormel, J.
    De Graaf, R.
    Vilagut, G.
    Alonso, J.
    Van Sonderen, E.
    Vollebergh, W. A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (04) : 185 - 197
  • [27] Measuring Disability in Consumers of mental health services - psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Ghana
    Badu, Eric
    Mitchell, Rebecca
    O'Brien, Anthony Paul
    Osei, Akwasi
    Rubin, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2021, 30 (05) : 1274 - 1288
  • [28] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma
    de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    Campos, Nataly Gurgel
    Fortaleza, Simone Castelo Branco
    Madeira, Caroline Alves
    Almondes, Jardel Goncalves de Sousa
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [29] Disability in depression and back pain - Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting
    Chwastiak, LA
    Von Korff, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06) : 507 - 514
  • [30] Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with COPD
    Zacarias, Laila Candida
    da Costa Camara, Kaytianne Jennifer
    Alves, Barbara Marques
    Aguiar Pessoa Morano, Maria Tereza
    Sampaio Viana, Cyntia Maria
    Bucharles Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano
    Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Leite, Camila Ferreira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (19) : 5663 - 5668