Antibody responses to filovirus infections in humans: protective or not?

被引:3
|
作者
Ilinykh, Philipp A. [1 ,3 ]
Bukreyev, Alexander [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Pathol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Galveston Natl Lab, Galveston, TX USA
来源
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2021年 / 21卷 / 11期
关键词
EBOLA-VIRUS GLYCOPROTEIN; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; DEPENDENT ENHANCEMENT; HEMORRHAGIC-FEVER; NONHUMAN-PRIMATES; MEDIATED PROTECTION; PAN-EBOLAVIRUS; VP35; NEUTRALIZATION; SURVIVOR;
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00006-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Disease outbreaks caused by Ebola virus and other filoviruses highlight the urgent need for an in-depth understanding of the role of antibody responses in recovery. In this Personal View we aim to discuss the controversial biological role of antibodies during natural filovirus infections in humans. Survival during natural human filovirus infections correlates with the magnitude of the process of antibodies binding to the filovirus glycoprotein and neutralising the virus. Despite the severity of the disease, highly potent monoclonal antibodies have been isolated from survivors of natural filovirus infections, suggesting that the magnitude of the antibody response is insufficient for prevention of severe disease. Unlike natural infections, filovirus vaccines, which express the viral glycoprotein, do induce protective concentrations of antibodies, albeit only when administered at very high doses. Multiple mechanisms by which filoviruses can delay and reduce the antibody response have been identified in the past decade. Furthermore, subneutralising antibody concentrations have been shown to enhance filovirus infections of immune cells bearing Fc receptors. Understanding the role of antibody responses during natural filovirus infections is important for the development of safe and potent vaccines and antibody-based treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:E348 / E355
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Personal Protective Equipment for Filovirus Epidemics: A Call for Better Evidence
    Sprecher, Armand G.
    Caluwaerts, An
    Draper, Mike
    Feldmann, Heinz
    Frey, Clifford P.
    Funk, Renee H.
    Kobinger, Gary
    Le Duc, James W.
    Spiropoulou, Christina
    Williams, Warren Jon
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 212 : S98 - S100
  • [42] Protective Role of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes in Filovirus Hemorrhagic Fever
    Warfield, Kelly Lyn
    Olinger, Gene Garrard
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011,
  • [43] Local and systemic antibody responses in humans with Helicobacter pylori infection
    Blanchard, TG
    Nedrud, JG
    Czinn, SJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 13 (07): : 591 - 594
  • [44] HUMORAL ANTIBODY-RESPONSE TO BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS INFECTIONS IN HUMANS
    LINDBERG, AA
    WEINTRAUB, A
    NORD, CE
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1979, : 46 - 51
  • [45] Role of Multivalency and Antigenic Threshold in Generating Protective Antibody Responses
    Slifka, Mark K.
    Amanna, Ian J.
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [46] SEROLOGICAL AND PROTECTIVE-ANTIBODY RESPONSES OF RABBITS TO LEPTOSPIRAL ANTIGENS
    ADLER, B
    FAINE, S
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1978, 11 (04) : 401 - 409
  • [47] Serum antibody responses to Clostridium difficile toxin A:: predictive and protective?
    Phillips, C
    GUT, 2001, 49 (02) : 167 - 168
  • [48] The protective role of antibody responses during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
    Abebe, F.
    Bjune, G.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 157 (02): : 235 - 243
  • [49] Broadening our view of protective antibody responses against HIV
    Burke, Brian
    Barnett, Susan W.
    CURRENT HIV RESEARCH, 2007, 5 (06) : 625 - 641
  • [50] Linking the outer membrane composition of salmonella to protective antibody responses
    Gutishvili, Gvantsa
    Bavro, Vassiliy N.
    Cunningham, Adam F.
    Gumbart, James C.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 122 (03) : 447A - 447A