EU assessment of enterococci as feed additives

被引:27
|
作者
Becquet, P [1 ]
机构
[1] FEFANA European Federat Feed Addit Manufacturers, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
regulation; risk assessment; probiotic; feed additive; enterococci;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00187-9
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Particular micro-organisms such as enterococcal strains are used as probiotics in feed. Observations indicate a positive effect of such strains on the gut flora, especially for young animals or during feed transition phases. This favourable effect is perceived by the fanners as a means of maintenance of the health status of the animals (e.g. less diarrhoea) and results in significant improvement of animal performance. Micro-organisms have been used since the end of the 1980s in animal feeds and were strictly regulated in 1993, when they were introduced under the scope of Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 on additives in animal nutrition on feed additives. After a transition period, which ended in the year 2000, every microbial strain must now be assessed by the EU bodies and authorised by a Commission Regulation, before it can be placed on the market for use in feedingstuffs. Council Directive 70/524/EEC on feed additives is based on three main principles: (1) pre-market authorisation, (2) positive list principle, and (3) thorough risk assessment of the effect of a particular strain on human and animal health as well as on the environment. Therefore, before introducing a new enterococcal strain preparation or promote a new use of an approved product, a dossier has to be submitted to the authorities, following the guidelines, as published in Commission Directive 94/40/EEC [Commission Directive 94/40/EC of 22 July 1994 amending Council Directive 87/153/EEC fixing guidelines for the assessment of additives in animal nutrition]. These guidelines contain detailed evaluation methods. The safety requirements refer to (1) the target animal categories, (2) the consumer and the environment (presence of toxins and virulence factors as well as antibiotic resistance and transferability are assessed), and (3) the workers, based on requirements of Council Directive 89/391/EEC. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk-Benefit Assessment of Feed Additives in the One Health Perspective
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Aquilina, Gabriele
    Cubadda, Francesco
    Marcon, Francesca
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 9
  • [22] Feed additives guidance
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2013, 173 (17)
  • [23] LEGISLATION AND FEED ADDITIVES
    SHILLAM, KWG
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1971, 89 (10) : 278 - &
  • [24] Assessment of Probiotic Properties ofLactobacillus salivariusIsolated From Chickens as Feed Additives
    Wang, Jian
    Ishfaq, Muhammad
    Guo, Yuquan
    Chen, Chunli
    Li, Jichang
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [25] DIFFICULTIES WITH FEED ADDITIVES
    AUCHTERLONIE, D
    BOWNASS, RC
    ATKIN, DA
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1980, 106 (14) : 319 - 319
  • [26] ADDITIVES IN FEED AND EEC
    BEAUMONT, WH
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1973, 92 (04) : 103 - 103
  • [27] Safety assessment of antibiotic and probiotic feed additives for Gallus gallus domesticus
    D. P. Neveling
    L. van Emmenes
    J. J. Ahire
    E. Pieterse
    C. Smith
    L. M. T. Dicks
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [28] Safety assessment of antibiotic and probiotic feed additives for Gallus gallus domesticus
    Neveling, D. P.
    van Emmenes, L.
    Ahire, J. J.
    Pieterse, E.
    Smith, C.
    Dicks, L. M. T.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [29] ERRA feed additives
    Orban Eva
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 2015, 137 (05) : 258 - 258
  • [30] Animal feed additives
    不详
    CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN, 2000, 36 (12) : 16 - 16