EU assessment of enterococci as feed additives

被引:27
|
作者
Becquet, P [1 ]
机构
[1] FEFANA European Federat Feed Addit Manufacturers, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
regulation; risk assessment; probiotic; feed additive; enterococci;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00187-9
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Particular micro-organisms such as enterococcal strains are used as probiotics in feed. Observations indicate a positive effect of such strains on the gut flora, especially for young animals or during feed transition phases. This favourable effect is perceived by the fanners as a means of maintenance of the health status of the animals (e.g. less diarrhoea) and results in significant improvement of animal performance. Micro-organisms have been used since the end of the 1980s in animal feeds and were strictly regulated in 1993, when they were introduced under the scope of Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 on additives in animal nutrition on feed additives. After a transition period, which ended in the year 2000, every microbial strain must now be assessed by the EU bodies and authorised by a Commission Regulation, before it can be placed on the market for use in feedingstuffs. Council Directive 70/524/EEC on feed additives is based on three main principles: (1) pre-market authorisation, (2) positive list principle, and (3) thorough risk assessment of the effect of a particular strain on human and animal health as well as on the environment. Therefore, before introducing a new enterococcal strain preparation or promote a new use of an approved product, a dossier has to be submitted to the authorities, following the guidelines, as published in Commission Directive 94/40/EEC [Commission Directive 94/40/EC of 22 July 1994 amending Council Directive 87/153/EEC fixing guidelines for the assessment of additives in animal nutrition]. These guidelines contain detailed evaluation methods. The safety requirements refer to (1) the target animal categories, (2) the consumer and the environment (presence of toxins and virulence factors as well as antibiotic resistance and transferability are assessed), and (3) the workers, based on requirements of Council Directive 89/391/EEC. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EU ban on four antibiotic feed additives
    Thorp, BH
    Cargill, PW
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1999, 144 (01) : 27 - 28
  • [2] EU bans four antibiotic feed additives
    不详
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1998, 143 (25) : 671 - 671
  • [3] EU ban on four antibiotic feed additives
    Sainsbury, DWB
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1999, 144 (03) : 80 - 80
  • [4] EU ban on four antibiotic feed additives
    Brander, GC
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1999, 144 (04) : 104 - 104
  • [5] Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives
    Rychen, Guido
    Aquilina, Gabriele
    Azimonti, Giovanna
    Bampidis, Vasileios
    Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
    Bories, Georges
    Chesson, Andrew
    Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Gropp, Jurgen
    Kolar, Boris
    Kouba, Maryline
    Lopez-Alonso, Marta
    Puente, Secundino Lopez
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Mayo, Baltasar
    Ramos, Fernando
    Saarela, Maria
    Villa, Roberto Edoardo
    Wallace, Robert John
    Wester, Pieter
    Anguita, Montserrat
    Galobart, Jaume
    Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo
    Martino, Laura
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (05)
  • [6] Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives
    Bampidis, Vasileios
    Azimonti, Giovanna
    de Lourdes Bastos, Maria
    Christensen, Henrik
    Durjava, Mojca
    Dusemund, Birgit
    Kouba, Maryline
    Lopez-Alonso, Marta
    Puente, Secundino Lopez
    Marcon, Francesca
    Mayo, Baltasar
    Pechova, Alena
    Petkova, Mariana
    Ramos, Fernando
    Villa, Roberto Edoardo
    Woutersen, Ruud
    Dierick, Noel
    Gropp, Juergen
    Martelli, Giovanna
    Rychen, Guido
    Anguita, Montserrat
    Galobart, Jaume
    Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo
    Navarro-Villa, Alberto
    Ortuno, Jordi
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2024, 22 (07)
  • [7] Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from commercial swine carcasses: effect of feed additives
    Davies, R
    Roberts, TA
    LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 29 (05) : 327 - 333
  • [8] Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the environment
    Bampidis, Vasileios
    Bastos, Maria
    Christensen, Henrik
    Dusemund, Birgit
    Kouba, Maryline
    Durjava, Mojca Kos
    Lopez-Alonso, Marta
    Puente, Secundino Lopez
    Marcon, Francesca
    Mayo, Baltasar
    Pechova, Alena
    Petkova, Mariana
    Ramos, Fernando
    Sanz, Yolanda
    Villa, Roberto Edoardo
    Woutersen, Ruud
    Brock, Theo
    de Knecht, Joop
    Kolar, Boris
    van Beelen, Patrick
    Padovani, Laura
    Tarres-Call, Jordi
    Vettori, Maria Vittoria
    Azimonti, Giovanna
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (04)
  • [9] Assessment of the Safety of Pine Tree Feed Additives
    Lapshin, Roman
    Maksimova, Natalia
    Lipskiy, Victor
    Ryzhov, Viktor
    Korotky, Vasily
    Mukhina, Irina
    ADVANCEMENTS IN LIFE SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (03): : 406 - 411
  • [10] Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer
    Rychen, Guido
    Aquilina, Gabriele
    Azimonti, Giovanna
    Bampidis, Vasileios
    Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
    Bories, Georges
    Chesson, Andrew
    Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Gropp, Juergen
    Kolar, Boris
    Kouba, Maryline
    Lopez-Alonso, Marta
    Puente, Secundino Lopez
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Mayo, Baltasar
    Ramos, Fernando
    Saarela, Maria
    Villa, Roberto Edoardo
    Wallace, Robert John
    Wester, Pieter
    Anguita, Montserrat
    Dujardin, Bruno
    Galobart, Jaume
    Innocenti, Matteo Lorenzo
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (10)