Historical and Forecasted Changes in Utilization of Same-day Discharge after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Luchristt, Douglas [1 ]
Kenton, Kimberly S. [2 ]
Bretschneider, C. Emi [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Div Urogynecol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 5324 McFarland Dr, Durham, NC 27707 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg Urogynecol, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
ERAS; Healthcare utilization; Modeling; Forecasting; ENHANCED RECOVERY; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; IMPLEMENTATION; READMISSION; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2022.03.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objectives: To describe changes in length of stay and same-day discharges (SDDs) after minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) over the last decade and forecast anticipated utilization over the subsequent decade. Design: Cross-sectional analysis. Setting: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients: All benign MIH excluding joint cases with concomitant nongynecologic surgery in the 2011 to 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets, identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. Interventions: A descriptive analysis of changes in the estimated length of stay and utilization of SDD from 2011 to 2019. Multivariable negative binomial regression assessed for individual-level risk factors for prolonged hospital stay and autoregressive linear forecasting estimated the growth of SDD through 2029. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 239 220 MIH were identified. Over the 9-year period, SDD increased by 10.7% across all MIH. However, in 2019, SDD represented only 29.8% of total MIH discharges and utilization varied by surgical approach (laparoscopic hysterectomy, 35.4%; vaginal hysterectomy, 18.6%; laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, 19.6%) and a surgical indication of pelvic organ prolapse (32.7% without and 13.9% with prolapse). Multivariable models controlling for patient characteristics showed independent associations of route and indication for MIH and length of stay (adjusted relative rate, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.32 for vaginal hysterectomy, and adjusted relative rate, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.11-1.14 for prolapse); however, these individual-level factors provided limited information explaining variation in the length of stay (model pseudo-R2, 0.054). Forecasting models suggest that utilization of SDD will grow to 48.5% (95% CI, 38.7-58.4) by the end of 2029. Conclusion: Although the estimated length of stay is decreasing among MIH over time, the utilization of SDD remained low in 2019 and was not explained by patient factors. If current trends hold, SDD utilization is not forecast to exceed 50% through 2029. Additional efforts focused on the provider and institution level are needed to encourage SDD as the standard of care for MIH. (C) 2022 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy in the morbidly obese patient population
    Haight, Paulina J.
    Barrington, David A.
    Graves, Stephen M.
    Piver, Rachael N.
    Baek, Jae
    Ardizzone, Melissa
    Akinduro, Jenifer A.
    Busho, Audrey C.
    Fadoju, Deborah
    Pandit, Radhika
    Stephens, Raeshawn
    Strowder, Lauren M.
    Tadepalli, Shreekari
    VanNoy, Brianna
    Sriram, Bhargavi
    McLaughlin, Eric M.
    Lightfoot, Michelle D. S.
    Bixel, Kristin L.
    Cohn, David E.
    Cosgrove, Casey M.
    O'Malley, David
    Salani, Ritu
    Nagel, Christa I.
    Backes, Floor J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 170 : 203 - 209
  • [32] Same Day Discharge after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Baker, M.
    Ding, T.
    Zhao, Z.
    Murarka, S.
    Butler, B.
    Adam, R.
    Prescott, L.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S194 - S195
  • [33] Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Alexander Melamed
    Jennifer L. Katz Eriksen
    Emily M. Hinchcliff
    Michael J. Worley
    Ross S. Berkowitz
    Neil S. Horowitz
    Michael G. Muto
    Richard D. Urman
    Colleen M. Feltmate
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 178 - 185
  • [34] COVID-19 as a Catalyst for Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Baker, Mary V.
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Murarka, Shivani M.
    Adam, Rony A.
    Prescott, Lauren S.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2023, 39 (04) : 170 - 176
  • [35] Same-Day Discharge After a Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Reality for the Enhanced Recovery Protocol
    Aillaud-De-Uriarte, Daniel
    Hernandez-Flores, Luis A.
    Hernandez-Moreno, Andrea
    Zachariah, Philip N.
    Bhatia, Ria
    Rodriguez-Gaytan, Jorge
    Marines-Copado, Diego
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [36] Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Melamed, A.
    Eriksen, J. L. Katz
    Hinchcliff, E. M.
    Worley, M.
    Berkowitz, R. S.
    Horowitz, N. S.
    Muto, M. G.
    Feltmate, C. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 : 37 - 38
  • [37] Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Eriksen, Jennifer L. Katz
    Hinchcliff, Emily M.
    Worley, Michael J., Jr.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Muto, Michael G.
    Urman, Richard D.
    Feltmate, Colleen M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 178 - 185
  • [38] Letter to "Changes to same day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy throughout COVID-19 pandemic"
    Guo, Jiali
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (08) : 2208 - 2208
  • [39] Discharge on the day of surgery after minimally invasive hysterectomy
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2022, 82 (11) : 1121 - 1121
  • [40] Safety of same day discharge for minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Praiss, A.
    Chen, L.
    St Clair, C. M.
    Tergas, A. I.
    Collado, F. Khoury
    Hou, J. Y.
    Wright, J. D.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 145 - 146