Effect of preventive (β blocker) treatment, behavioural migraine management, or their combination on outcomes of optimised acute treatment in frequent migraine: randomised controlled trial

被引:115
|
作者
Holroyd, Kenneth A. [2 ]
Cottrell, Constance K. [2 ]
O'Donnell, Francis J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cordingley, Gary E. [1 ]
Drew, Jana B. [2 ]
Carlson, Bruce W.
Himawan, Lina
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Headache Treatment & Res, Westerville, OH 43081 USA
[3] OrthoNeuro Inc, Westerville, OH 43081 USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL-TRIALS; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PRIMARY-CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT; RECURRENT HEADACHE; EARLY INTERVENTION; UNITED-STATES; PROPRANOLOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.c4871
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine if the addition of preventive drug treatment (beta blocker), brief behavioural migraine management, or their combination improves the outcome of optimised acute treatment in the management of frequent migraine. Design Randomised placebo controlled trial over 16 months from July 2001 to November 2005. Setting Two outpatient sites in Ohio, USA. Participants 232 adults (mean age 38 years; 79% female) with diagnosis of migraine with or without aura according to International Headache Society classification of headache disorders criteria, who recorded at least three migraines with disability per 30 days (mean 5.5 migraines/30 days), during an optimised run-in of acute treatment. Interventions Addition of one of four preventive treatments to optimised acute treatment: beta blocker (n=53), matched placebo (n=55), behavioural migraine management plus placebo (n=55), or behavioural migraine management plus beta blocker (n=69). Main outcome measure The primary outcome was change in migraines/30 days; secondary outcomes included change in migraine days/30 days and change in migraine specific quality of life scores. Results Mixed model analysis showed statistically significant (P <= 0.05) differences in outcomes among the four added treatments for both the primary outcome (migraines/30 days) and the two secondary outcomes (change in migraine days/30 days and change in migraine specific quality of life scores). The addition of combined beta blocker and behavioural migraine management (-3.3 migraines/30 days, 95% confidence interval -3.2 to -3.5), but not the addition of beta blocker alone (-2.1 migraines/30 days, -1.9 to -2.2) or behavioural migraine management alone (-2.2 migraines migraines/30 days, -2.0 to -2.4), improved outcomes compared with optimised acute treatment alone (-2.1 migraines/30 days, -1.9 to -2.2). For a clinically significant (>= 50% reduction) in migraines/30 days, the number needed to treat for optimised acute treatment plus combined beta blocker and behavioural migraine management was 3.1 compared with optimised acute treatment alone, 2.6 compared with optimised acute treatment plus beta blocker, and 3.1 compared with optimised acute treatment plus behavioural migraine management. Results were consistent for the two secondary outcomes, and at both month 10 ( the primary end point) and month 16. Conclusion The addition of combined beta blocker plus behavioural migraine management, but not the addition of beta blocker alone or behavioural migraine management alone, improved outcomes of optimised acute treatment. Combined beta blocker treatment and behavioural migraine management may improve outcomes in the treatment of frequent migraine.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized controlled trial of telcagepant combined with ibuprofen or acetaminophen in the acute treatment of migraine
    Hewitt, D.
    Martin, V.
    Lipton, R. B.
    Brandes, J.
    Ceesay, P.
    Gottwald, R.
    Schaefer, E.
    Lines, C.
    Ho, T. W.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2010, 11 : S102 - S103
  • [42] A pilot study of cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation for migraine headache: a randomised controlled trial
    Cousins, S.
    Ridsdale, L.
    Goldstein, L. H.
    Noble, A. J.
    Moorey, S.
    Seed, P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 262 (12) : 2764 - 2772
  • [43] Randomized Controlled Trial of Telcagepant Combined with Ibuprofen or Acetaminophen in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
    Hewitt, D.
    Martin, V.
    Lipton, R. B.
    Brandes, J.
    Ceesay, P.
    Gottwald, R.
    Schaefer, E.
    Lines, C.
    Ho, T. W.
    HEADACHE, 2010, 50 : S15 - S15
  • [44] A COMBINATION-DRUG TREATMENT FOR ACUTE COMMON MIGRAINE
    UZOGARA, E
    SHEEHAN, DV
    MANSCHRECK, TC
    JONES, KJ
    HEADACHE, 1986, 26 (05): : 231 - 236
  • [45] Rimegepant for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine: a narrative review of the evidence
    Edvinsson, Lars
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2024,
  • [46] Atogepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine Among Participants With Episodic Migraine With Prior Treatment Failure: Results From the ELEVATE Trial
    Pozo-Rosich, Patricia
    Nagy, Krisztian
    Tassorelli, Cristina
    Lanteri-Minet, Michel
    Sacco, Sara
    Nezadal, Tomas
    Finnegan, Michelle
    Guo, Hua
    Ferreira, Rosa De Abreu
    Trugman, Joel M.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2023, 43 (1supp) : 47 - 49
  • [47] Randomised controlled trials of preventive treatment of migraine in children: Quality of evidence as assessed against IHS guidelines
    Khurshid, Muhammad Salman
    Abu-Arafeh, Ishaq
    CEPHALALGIA, 2019, 39 : 252 - 253
  • [48] Clopidogrel as prophylactic treatment for migraine: A pilot randomised, controlled study
    Chambers, John B.
    Seed, Paul T.
    Ridsdale, Leone
    CEPHALALGIA, 2014, 34 (14) : 1163 - 1168
  • [49] A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LOW DOSES OF PROPRANOLOL, NORTRIPTYLINE, AND THE COMBINATION OF PROPRANOLOL AND NORTRIPTYLINE FOR THE PREVENTIVE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE
    Domingues, Renan B.
    Piraja da Silva, Andre L.
    Domingues, Simone A.
    Aquino, Camila Catherine H.
    Kuster, Gustavo W.
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2009, 67 (04) : 973 - 977
  • [50] A randomized, controlled trial of massage therapy as a treatment for migraine
    Lawler, Sheleigh P.
    Cameron, Linda D.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2006, 32 (01) : 50 - 59