Fixed-time artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers after estrus synchronization with human chorionic gonadotropin or gonadotropin-releasing hormone

被引:8
|
作者
Dahlen, C. R. [2 ]
Marquezini, G. H. L. [1 ]
Larson, J. E. [3 ]
Lamb, G. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, N Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Marianna, FL 32446 USA
[2] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
beef heifer; estrus synchronization; human chorionic gonadotropin; ovulation; PREGNANCY RATES; ESTROUS-CYCLE; DAIRY-COWS; FOLLICULAR DYNAMICS; OVULATORY FOLLICLE; CORPUS-LUTEUM; FERTILITY; GNRH; PROGESTERONE; PROSTAGLANDIN-F2-ALPHA;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2010-3824
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
We determined the effects of hCG on ovarian response, concentration of progesterone, and fertility in a fixed-time AI (TAI) protocol. Four hundred forty-four crossbred beef heifers were synchronized with the CO-Synch + CIDR (controlled internal drug-releasing insert) protocol. In addition, heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with main factors being 1) pretreatment, no treatment (control), or treatment with 1,000 IU of hCG 14 d before the initiation of the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol and 2) treatment, administration of 1,000 IU of hCG or 100 mu g of GnRH at CIDR insertion of the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol. Blood samples were collected from all heifers on d -21, -14, -7, 0, and 2 relative to PGF(2 alpha) injection. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to examine ovaries in a subset of heifers (n - 362) on d -7 and 0 relative to PGF(2 alpha), and to determine pregnancy status of all heifers on d 33 and 82 relative to AI. Pregnancy rates were similar for heifers pretreated with control (33.0%) or hCG (36.4%), whereas pregnancy rates were greater (P < 0.01) for heifers treated with GnRH (40.1%) compared with hCG (29.0%) at CIDR insertion. Heifers pretreated with hCG had more (P < 0.01) corpora lutea present on the day of CIDR insertion and the day of CIDR removal compared with untreated heifers. A greater proportion (P < 0.01) of heifers ovulated as a result of administration of hCG at the time of CIDR insertion (59.0%) compared with GnRH (38.7%). Heifers treated with hCG at CIDR insertion had greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of progesterone compared with those receiving GnRH at the time of CIDR removal (2.42 +/- 0.13 vs. 1.74 +/- 0.13 ng/mL; P < 0.01) and at fixed-time AI (0.52 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.39 +/- 0.03 ng/mL; P < 0.01). Therefore, hCG was more effective than GnRH in its ability to ovulate follicles and to increase concentrations of progesterone in beef heifers. Presynchronization with hCG 14 d before CIDR insertion did not alter pregnancy rates, whereas replacing GnRH with hCG at CIDR insertion decreased pregnancy rates.
引用
收藏
页码:2750 / 2758
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pregnancy establishment and maintenance after the administration of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) associated or not with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after insemination in sheep
    Garcia-Pintos, C.
    Menchaca, A.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (10) : 1802 - 1806
  • [42] Replacing the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in an Ovsynch protocol with human chorionic gonadotropin decreased pregnancies per artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows
    Cabrera, E. M.
    Lauber, M. R.
    Valdes-Arciniega, T.
    El Azzi, M. S.
    Martins, J. P. N.
    Bilby, T. R.
    Fricke, P. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (07) : 8290 - 8300
  • [43] Progesterone concentration, estradiol pretreatment, and dose of gonadotropin-releasing hormone affect gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers
    Dias, F. C. F.
    Colazo, M. G.
    Kastelic, J. P.
    Mapletoft, R. J.
    Adams, G. P.
    Singh, J.
    DOMESTIC ANIMAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 39 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [44] Estrus expression and pregnancy rates in heifers primiparous and multiparous Nelore cows subjected to timed artificial insemination with strategic use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone
    Bonato, Denis Vinicius
    Carrer Filho, Luigi
    Santos, Eriko Silva
    Figueira, Murilo Rezende
    Cerezetti, Marcela Bortoletto
    Morotti, Fabio
    Seneda, Marcelo Marcondes
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2021, 42 (06): : 3825 - 3835
  • [45] Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin improves in vitro fertilization outcome in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles
    Seval, Mehmet Murat
    Ozmen, Batuhan
    Atabekoglu, Cem
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Simsir, Coskun
    Kan, Ozgur
    Sonmezer, Murat
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (09) : 1146 - 1151
  • [46] Effect of norgestomet or norgestomet and gonadotropin-releasing hormone on attainment of puberty in beef heifers
    Henderson, CL
    Miller, HL
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 76 (03) : 477 - 479
  • [47] Equine chorionic gonadotropin improves the efficacy of a progestin-based fixed-time artificial insemination protocol in Nelore (Bos indicus) heifers
    Sa Filho, M. F.
    Torres-Junior, J. R. S.
    Penteado, L.
    Gimenes, L. U.
    Ferreira, R. M.
    Ayres, H.
    Castro e Paula, L. A.
    Sales, J. N. S.
    Baruselli, P. S.
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2010, 118 (2-4) : 182 - 187
  • [48] Synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle
    Bo, G. A.
    Baruselli, P. S.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 : 144 - 150
  • [49] EFFICACY OF GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE ADMINISTERED AT THE TIME OF ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION OF HEIFERS AND POSTPARTUM AND REPEAT BREEDER DAIRY-COWS
    LEE, CN
    MAURICE, E
    AX, RL
    PENNINGTON, JA
    HOFFMAN, WF
    BROWN, MD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1983, 44 (11) : 2160 - 2163
  • [50] Artificial insemination by estrus detection or by fixed-time in superovulated beef cows
    Forrest, D.
    Calloway, J.
    Riley, D.
    Steinhauser, C.
    Posey, D.
    Looney, C.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 361 - 362