A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Approach for Evaluation and Selection of Sustainable Suppliers in the Avionics Industry of Pakistan

被引:16
|
作者
Muhammad, Noor [1 ]
Fang, Zhigeng [1 ]
Shah, Syed Ahsan Ali [2 ]
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem [3 ]
Alsanad, Ahmed [4 ]
Gumaei, Abdu [4 ]
Solangi, Yasir Ahmed [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210016, Peoples R China
[4] King Saud Univ, Dept Informat Syst, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, STCs Artificial Intelligence Chair, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
关键词
counterfeit electronics; sustainable supplier selection; reliability; avionics industry; FAHP; FTOPSIS; ENTERPRISES;
D O I
10.3390/su12114744
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reliability and quality are the two ultimate objectives in the avionics industry. The risk of counterfeit electronics and the unavailability of screening facilities for 100% components are the most concerning areas in the supply chain of the avionics industry. Unlike most public procurement, the cost is not the only significant criterion. Unbiased decision-making criteria to accommodate all the important factors without compromising on quality, reliability, and maintainability are essential for the evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers. Therefore, this study proposes an unbiased decision methodology based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS). In the first phase, six main and twenty-one sub-criteria are selected from the literature and empirically validated by experts of the avionics industry. FAHP is used to evaluate the weight of the main criteria and sub-criteria. FTOPSIS is used to prioritize eight alternatives (suppliers) concerning their effectiveness and superiority in finding the best alternatives. The results of the FAHP reveal that traceability (T) is the most important criterion, followed by quality (Q), and cost (C), which rank as the second and third most significant criteria. The results of the FTOPSIS rate supplier 8, supplier 2, and supplier 1 as the first, second, and third most effective suppliers, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fuzzy Multi Criteria Approach for Sustainable Maintenance Evaluation in Rubber Industry
    Amrina, Elita
    Yulianto, Ardy
    Kamil, Insannul
    SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING FOR GLOBAL CIRCULAR ECONOMY, 2019, 33 : 538 - 545
  • [42] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Selection of Non-Ferrous Scrap Metal Suppliers
    Yeh, Chung-Hsing
    Kuo, Yu-Liang
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2020, : 841 - 847
  • [43] SELECTION OF SUPPLIERS IN THE GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN: CASE STUDY WITH MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION
    de Freitas, Allyson
    Salgado, Eduardo Gomes
    Sousa Lira, Jean Marcel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (01) : 51 - 64
  • [44] A SOFTWARE MODULE FOR MULTI-CRITERIA SUPPLIERS' SELECTION WITH RESPECT TO THE SPARE PARTS LOGISTIC
    Makarova, Irina
    Shubenkova, Ksenia
    Buyvol, Polina
    Mukhametdinov, Eduard
    TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 2020, 15 (01) : 105 - 116
  • [45] Supplier selection in the oil & gas industry: A comprehensive approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yazdi, Amir Karbassi
    Wanke, Peter Fernandes
    Hanne, Thomas
    Abdi, Farshid
    Sarfaraz, Amir Homayoun
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2022, 79
  • [46] A hybrid fuzzy rule-based multi-criteria framework for sustainable project portfolio selection
    Khalili-Damghani, Kaveh
    Sadi-Nezhad, Soheil
    Lotfi, Farhad Hosseinzadeh
    Tavana, Madjid
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 220 : 442 - 462
  • [47] Measuring regional sustainable competitiveness: a multi-criteria approach
    Amelia Bilbao-Terol
    Mar Arenas-Parra
    Vitali Onopko-Onopko
    Operational Research, 2019, 19 : 637 - 660
  • [48] Multi-criteria evaluation + the positional approach to candidate selection in e-voting
    Alguliyev R.
    Aliguliyev R.
    Yusifov F.
    Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2019, 2 (02): : 65 - 80
  • [49] A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Evaluation Approach for R&D Project Selection
    Yi, Changsheng
    Ning, Yufu
    Jin, Qiumei
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 7598 - +
  • [50] A multi-stage multi-criteria hierarchical decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection
    Hendiani, Sepehr
    Mahmoudi, Amin
    Liao, Huchang
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 94