Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota

被引:4
|
作者
Shibata, Takeo [1 ,2 ]
Nakagawa, Mayumi [1 ]
Coleman, Hannah N. [1 ]
Owens, Sarah M. [3 ]
Greenfield, William W. [4 ]
Sasagawa, Toshiyuki [2 ]
Robeson, Michael S., II [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] Kanazawa Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Uchinada, Ishikawa, Japan
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Biosci Div, Lemont, IL USA
[4] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[5] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Biomed Informat, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
GUT MICROBIOTA; RNA; CLASSIFICATION; DIVERSITY; THINPREP; STABILITY; PRIMER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0237556
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Cervical microbiota (CM) are considered an important factor affecting the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and are implicated in the persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV). Collection of liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples is routine for cervical cancer screening and HPV genotyping and can be used for long-term cytological biobanking. We sought to determine whether it is possible to access microbial DNA from LBC specimens, and compared the performance of four different extraction protocols: (ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit; QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit; QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; and IndiSpin Pathogen Kit) and their ability to capture the diversity of CM from LBC specimens. LBC specimens from 20 patients (stored for 716 +/- 105 days) with CIN values of 2 or 3 were each aliquoted for each of the four kits. Loss of microbial diversity due to long-term LBC storage could not be assessed due to lack of fresh LBC samples. Comparisons with other types of cervical sampling were not performed. We observed that all DNA extraction kits provided equivalent accessibility to the cervical microbial DNA within stored LBC samples. Approximately 80% microbial genera were shared among all DNA extraction protocols. Potential kit contaminants were observed as well. Variation between individuals was a significantly greater influence on the observed microbial composition than was the method of DNA extraction. We also observed that HPV16 was significantly associated with community types that were not dominated by Lactobacillus iners.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparative study of conventional and liquid-based cervical cytology
    Budak, Mehmet Sukru
    Senturk, Mehmet B.
    Kaya, Cihan
    Akgol, Sedat
    Bademkiran, Muhammed H.
    Tahaoglu, Ali Emre
    Yildirim, Ayhan
    Buyukbayram, Huseyin
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 87 (03) : 190 - 193
  • [42] Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary
    Bak Mihaly
    Seberne Ell Maria
    Boka Melinda
    Veleczki Zsuzsanna
    Nyari Tibor
    Pete Imre
    Szentirmay Zoltan
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2014, 155 (18) : 708 - 714
  • [43] The evaluation of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical liquid-based cytology specimens; using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping assay
    Jamison, J.
    Wilson, R. T.
    Carson, J.
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 20 (04) : 242 - 248
  • [44] Multi-center evaluation of the Alinity m HR HPV assay with liquid-based cytology cervical specimens in the United States
    Goldstein, D. Yitzchak
    Yang, Tong
    Lucic, Danijela
    Zhang, Yan
    Cullum, Richard
    Kostera, Joshua
    Patel, Anami
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2025, 13 (03)
  • [45] Stability of archived liquid-based cervical cytologic specimens
    Castle, PE
    Solomon, D
    Hildesheim, A
    Herrero, R
    Bratti, MC
    Sherman, ME
    Rodriguez, AC
    Alfaro, M
    Hutchinson, ML
    Dunn, ST
    Kuypers, J
    Schiffman, M
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 99 (02): : 89 - 96
  • [46] A Deep Learning Model for Cervical Cancer Screening on Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens in Whole Slide Images
    Kanavati, Fahdi
    Hirose, Naoki
    Ishii, Takahiro
    Fukuda, Ayaka
    Ichihara, Shin
    Tsuneki, Masayuki
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [47] Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: Experience from the first 1000 split samples
    Singh, Vikrant Bhar
    Gupta, Nalini
    Nijhawan, Raje
    Srinivasan, Radhika
    Suri, Vanita
    Rajwanshi, Arvind
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 58 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [48] Evaluation of liquid-based cytology in public screening for cervical cancer in Southern Jutland in Denmark
    Hariri, J.
    APMIS, 2011, 119 : 44 - 45
  • [49] INCIDENCE UNSATISFACTORY RATE CERVICAL CYTOLOGY CLASSIFICATION IN LIQUID-BASED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL CYTOLOGY
    Saied, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 914 - 914
  • [50] Liquid-Based Cytology vs Conventional Cytology in Detecting Cervical Cancer Reply
    Schiffman, Mark
    Solomon, Diane
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (11): : 1034 - 1035