Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Luiten, Jacky D. [1 ,4 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [2 ,3 ]
Luiten, Ernest J. T. [4 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Univ Med Ctr, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, S Gravendijkwal 230, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Res Inst GROW, Dept Epidemiol, Utrechtse Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, Godebaldkwartier 419, NL-3511 DT Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Amphia Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Molengracht 21, NL-4818 CK Breda, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, NL-6538 SW Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive breast cancer; Tumour grade; MAMMOGRAPHY; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM; OVERDIAGNOSIS; OVERTREATMENT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-017-4412-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a biennial screening mammography programme, we analysed the trends in incidence of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancers in the era of screen-film mammography (SFM) screening, the period of the transition to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening and the period of FFDM screening. We also investigated a possible association between the incidence and grading of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancer. In the southern part of the Netherlands, FFDM screening gradually replaced SFM screening between May 2009 and April 2010. We included a consecutive series of 484, 422 screens obtained between July 2005 and July 2015 and divided these screens into three groups; SFM-only cohort, transition cohort and FFDM-only cohort. A total of 3059 referred women were diagnosed with DCIS (n = 623) or invasive breast cancer (n = 2436). The majority of DCIS were high-grade (48.2%), whereas the majority of the invasive breast cancers were low-grade (45.4%) or intermediate-grade (41.6%). The cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 screened women showed the same distribution by grade in both groups. The transition to FFDM was characterised by an increased overall detection rate of invasive cancers. Screening mammography detects mostly high-grade DCIS and low- or intermediate-grade invasive cancers. The grade distribution as well as the CDR in the years after the introduction of FFDM remained stable compared to the era of SFM screening. By diagnosing and treating high-grade DCIS, which otherwise may develop into high-grade invasive carcinoma, our findings provide new evidence for the beneficial value of screening mammography programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 314
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incidence and Risk Factors of Interval and Screen-Detected Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Yuqi
    Rodriguez, Juan
    Mao, Xinhe
    Grassmann, Felix
    Tapia, Jose
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Hall, Per
    Czene, Kamila
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [22] Pathologic-radiologic correlations in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Findings of the Singapore breast screening project
    Tan, PH
    Ho, JTS
    Ng, EH
    Chiang, GSC
    Low, SC
    Ng, FC
    Bay, BH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 90 (04) : 231 - 236
  • [23] Impact of core biopsy on the management of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in siture of the breast
    Cheng, MSP
    Fox, J
    Hart, SA
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 73 (06) : 404 - 406
  • [24] Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ - fine needle aspiration versus core biopsy
    CM Lee
    B Kaye
    L McLean
    Breast Cancer Research, 11
  • [25] Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ - fine needle aspiration versus core biopsy
    Lee, C. M.
    Kaye, B.
    McLean, L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 11
  • [26] Overdiagnosis of screen-detected breast cancer
    Milch, Vivienne
    Aranda, Sanchia
    Canfell, Karen
    Varlow, Megan
    Roder, David M.
    Currow, David
    Anderiesz, Cleola
    Keefe, Dorothy
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021, 214 (10) : 455 - +
  • [27] Breast cancer risk following treatment of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in-situ: a population-based data linkage study
    Elizabeth, Buckley
    Sullivan, T.
    Hiller, J.
    Farshid, G.
    David, Roder
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 82 - 82
  • [28] Stages of screen-detected breast cancer
    K Koufopoulos
    I Garas
    Ch Pateras
    E Ampatzoglou
    P Kakavoulis
    A Michas
    S Gravas
    V Sarrou
    D Tsitsimelis
    M Tsompanlioti
    N Papageorgiou
    K Kapridaki
    F De Waard
    Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [29] The Management of Screen-detected Breast Cancer
    Ahmed, Muneer
    Douek, Michael
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (03) : 1141 - 1146
  • [30] Variations in the management of the axilla in screen-detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Evidence from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme audit of screen detected DCIS
    Nicholson, S.
    Hanby, A.
    Clements, K.
    Kearins, O.
    Lawrence, G.
    Dodwell, D.
    Bishop, H.
    Thompson, A.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (01): : 86 - 93