Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer

被引:20
|
作者
Luiten, Jacky D. [1 ,4 ]
Voogd, Adri C. [2 ,3 ]
Luiten, Ernest J. T. [4 ]
Duijm, Lucien E. M. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Univ Med Ctr, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, S Gravendijkwal 230, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Res Inst GROW, Dept Epidemiol, Utrechtse Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, Godebaldkwartier 419, NL-3511 DT Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Amphia Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Molengracht 21, NL-4818 CK Breda, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Weg Door Jonkerbos 100, NL-6532 SZ Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Dutch Reference Ctr Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, NL-6538 SW Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive breast cancer; Tumour grade; MAMMOGRAPHY; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM; OVERDIAGNOSIS; OVERTREATMENT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-017-4412-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In a biennial screening mammography programme, we analysed the trends in incidence of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancers in the era of screen-film mammography (SFM) screening, the period of the transition to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening and the period of FFDM screening. We also investigated a possible association between the incidence and grading of screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancer. In the southern part of the Netherlands, FFDM screening gradually replaced SFM screening between May 2009 and April 2010. We included a consecutive series of 484, 422 screens obtained between July 2005 and July 2015 and divided these screens into three groups; SFM-only cohort, transition cohort and FFDM-only cohort. A total of 3059 referred women were diagnosed with DCIS (n = 623) or invasive breast cancer (n = 2436). The majority of DCIS were high-grade (48.2%), whereas the majority of the invasive breast cancers were low-grade (45.4%) or intermediate-grade (41.6%). The cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 screened women showed the same distribution by grade in both groups. The transition to FFDM was characterised by an increased overall detection rate of invasive cancers. Screening mammography detects mostly high-grade DCIS and low- or intermediate-grade invasive cancers. The grade distribution as well as the CDR in the years after the introduction of FFDM remained stable compared to the era of SFM screening. By diagnosing and treating high-grade DCIS, which otherwise may develop into high-grade invasive carcinoma, our findings provide new evidence for the beneficial value of screening mammography programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 314
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer
    Jacky D. Luiten
    Adri C. Voogd
    Ernest J. T. Luiten
    Lucien E. M. Duijm
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2017, 166 : 307 - 314
  • [2] The long-term psychosocial consequences of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer
    Gram, Emma Grundtvig
    Manso, Tulia Filipa Roberto
    Heleno, Bruno
    Siersma, Volkert
    Rogvi, Jessica A.
    Brodersen, John Brandt
    BREAST, 2023, 70 : 41 - 48
  • [3] Results of diagnostic examinations and pathological grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS)
    Sapino, A
    Bianchi, S
    Arisio, R
    Berardengo, E
    Ponti, A
    Ru, G
    Giorgi, D
    Morrone, D
    Marra, V
    Vezzosi, V
    Bongioanni, M
    Frigerio, A
    delTurco, MR
    Mano, MP
    Coluccia, C
    Giani, R
    Distante, V
    Simoncini, R
    Cardona, G
    Segnan, N
    BREAST, 1997, 6 (05): : 327 - 328
  • [4] Urban-rural differences in the management of screen-detected invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in Victoria
    Kok, David L.
    Chang, Jiun-Horng
    Erbas, Bircan
    Fletcher, Ashley
    Kavanagh, Anne M.
    Henderson, Michael A.
    Gertig, Dorota M.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 76 (11) : 996 - 1001
  • [5] International variation in management of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Ponti, Antonio
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    James, Ted
    Majek, Ondrej
    von Euler-Chelpin, My
    Anttila, Ahti
    Fitzpatrick, Patricia
    Mano, Maria Piera
    Kawai, Masaaki
    Scharpantgen, Astrid
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Vidal, Carmen
    Ascunce, Nieves
    Salas, Dolores
    Bulliard, Jean-Luc
    Segnan, Nereo
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Taplin, Stephen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (15) : 2695 - 2704
  • [6] Adverse surgical outcomes in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Thomas, Jeremy
    Hanby, Andrew
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Ball, Graham
    Lawrence, Gill
    Maxwell, Anthony
    Wallis, Matthew
    Evans, Andrew
    Dobson, Hilary
    Clements, Karen
    Thompson, Alastair
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (11) : 1880 - 1890
  • [7] Patterns of aggressiveness: risk of progression to invasive breast cancer by mammographic features of calcifications in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ
    Lilleborge, Marie
    Falk, Ragnhild S.
    Hovda, Tone
    Holmen, Marit M.
    Ursin, Giske
    Hofvind, Solveig
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2022, 63 (05) : 586 - 595
  • [8] Radiotherapy after mastectomy for screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ
    Recht, A.
    BREAST DISEASES, 2016, 27 (01): : 74 - 76
  • [9] Radiotherapy after mastectomy for screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ
    Clements, K.
    Dodwell, D.
    Lawrence, G.
    Ball, G.
    Francis, A.
    Pinder, S.
    Sawyer, E.
    Wallis, M.
    Thompson, A. M.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (10): : 1406 - 1410
  • [10] Pathological and Biological Differences Between Screen-Detected and Interval Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast
    Marnix A. de Roos
    Bert van der Vegt
    Jaap de Vries
    Jelle Wesseling
    Geertruida H. de Bock
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2007, 14 : 2097 - 2104