Do people with low back pain walk differently? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Smith, Jo Armour [1 ]
Stabbert, Heidi [1 ]
Bagwell, Jennifer J. [2 ]
Teng, Hsiang -Ling [2 ]
Wade, Vernie [1 ]
Lee, Szu-Ping [3 ]
机构
[1] Chapman Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Irvine, CA 92618 USA
[2] Calif State Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
[3] Univ Nevada, Dept Phys Therapy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Biomechanics; Low back pain; Running; Walking; TRUNK MUSCLE ACTIVATION; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; PLANTAR PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS; PELVIS-THORAX COORDINATION; UPDATED METHOD GUIDELINES; OLDER-ADULTS; GAIT ANALYSIS; TRANSVERSE PLANE; LEVEL WALKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jshs.2022.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: The biomechanics of the trunk and lower limbs during walking and running gait are frequently assessed in individuals with low back pain (LBP). Despite substantial research, it is still unclear whether consistent and generalizable changes in walking or running gait occur in association with LBP. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify whether there are differences in biomechanics during walking and running gait in individuals with acute and persistent LBP compared with back-healthy controls. Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO in June 2019 and was repeated in December 2020. Studies were included if they reported biomechanical characteristics of individuals with and without LBP during steady-state or perturbed walking and running. Biomechanical data included spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, and electromyography variables. The reporting quality and potential for bias of each study was assessed. Data were pooled where possible to compare the standardized mean differences (SMD) between back pain and back-healthy control groups. Results: Ninety-seven studies were included and reviewed. Two studies investigated acute pain and the rest investigated persistent pain. Nine studies investigated running gait. Of the studies, 20% had high reporting quality/low risk of bias. In comparison with back-healthy controls, individuals with persistent LBP walked slower (SMD = -0.59, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): -0.77 to -0.42)) and with shorter stride length (SMD = -0.38, 95%CI: -0.60 to -0.16). There were no differences in the amplitude of motion in the thoracic or lumbar spine, pelvis, or hips in individuals with LBP. During walking, coordination of motion between the thorax and the lumbar spine/pelvis was significantly more in-phase in the persistent LBP groups (SMD = -0.60, 95%CI: -0.90 to -0.30), and individuals with persistent LBP exhibited greater amplitude of activation in the paraspinal muscles (SMD = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.23-0.80). There were no consistent differences in running biomechanics between groups. Conclusion: There is moderate-to-strong evidence that individuals with persistent LBP demonstrate differences in walking gait compared to back-healthy controls.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 465
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Enke, Oliver
    New, Heather A.
    New, Charles H.
    Mathieson, Stephanie
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Latimer, Jane
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Lin, C. -W. Christine
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 190 (26) : E786 - E793
  • [42] Pain Management Interventions for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mekhail, Nagy
    Eldabe, Sam
    Templeton, Erin
    Costandi, Shrif
    Rosenquist, Richard
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 39 (07): : 349 - 364
  • [43] Neurophysiological Pain Education for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tegner, Heidi
    Frederiksen, Pernille
    Esbensen, Bente A.
    Juhl, Carsten
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 34 (08): : 778 - 786
  • [44] Reducing Low-Value Imaging for Low Back Pain: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
    Belavy, Daniel L.
    Tagliaferri, Scott D.
    Buntine, Paul
    Saueressig, Tobias
    Samanna, Claire
    Mcguckian, Thomas
    Miller, Clint T.
    Owen, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2022, 52 (04): : 175 - 191
  • [45] Psychosocial areas of worklife and chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buruck, Gabriele
    Tomaschek, Anne
    Wendsche, Johannes
    Ochsmann, Elke
    Doerfel, Denise
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [46] The McKenzie method for low back pain - A systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis approach
    Machado, LAC
    de Souza, MS
    Ferreira, PH
    Ferreira, ML
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (09) : E254 - E262
  • [47] The relationships between low back pain and lumbar lordosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chun, Se-Woong
    Lim, Chai-Young
    Kim, Keewon
    Hwang, Jinseub
    Chung, Sun G.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (08): : 1180 - 1191
  • [48] Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ferraro, Michael C.
    Bagg, Matthew K.
    Wewege, Michael A.
    Cashin, Aidan G.
    Leake, Hayley B.
    Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N.
    Jones, Matthew D.
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    Day, Richard
    Loo, Colleen K.
    McAuley, James H.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [49] The effectiveness of moxibustion for treating of low back pain A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Siyuan
    Xiong, Jun
    Chen, Jun
    Tang, Genhua
    Zhong, Zhiying
    Lu, LunBin
    Zhou, Xingchen
    Guo, Han
    Fan, Hao
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (43) : E22522
  • [50] Targeting neurotrophic factors for low back pain and sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N.
    Ferraro, Michael C.
    Wewege, Michael A.
    Cashin, Aidan G.
    Leake, Hayley B.
    O'Hagan, Edel T.
    Jones, Matthew D.
    Gustin, Sylvia M.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Day, Richard
    McAuley, James H.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 61 (06) : 2243 - 2254