Revising the Academy's Research Priorities: Methods of the Research Priorities and Strategies Development Task Force, 2017-2019

被引:7
|
作者
Garner, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Proano, Gabriela, V [3 ]
Kelley, Kathryn [3 ]
Banna, Jinan C. [4 ]
Emenaker, Nancy J. [5 ]
Sauer, Kevin [6 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, John Glenn Coll Publ Affairs, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Acad Nutr & Dietet, 120 S Riverside Plaza,Suite 2190, Chicago, IL 60606 USA
[4] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Coll Trop Agr & Human Resources, Dept Human Nutr Food & Anim Sci, Agr Sci 216, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[5] NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] Kansas State Univ, Coll Hlth & Human Sci, Dietet, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
RESEARCH AGENDA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.013
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, as the largest member-based nutrition organization in the world, is dedicated to advancing the world of nutrition and dietetics through research. It is essential for the Academy to identify both current and future research priorities for nutrition and dietetics professionals. To address this, the Academy convened a task force charged with developing research priorities relevant for its members. Specifically, it would define key issues of the nutrition and dietetics profession going into the second century and identify relevant research topics and questions related to the defined issues. The task force leveraged multiple data sources to develop the research priorities. These data sources included existing interviews from a previous Academy event (Nutrition Impact Summit) held in 2016 and answers from an Academy Member Engagement Zone survey. This led to the development of draft research priorities that were included in a more extensive survey e-mailed to all Academy members. Results of this member-wide survey, in addition to multiple stakeholder checks, informed the final Academy research priorities. Thirteen final priorities were established across 4 domains: nutrition related discovery, clinical nutrition research, implementation science, and public health. These priorities have relevance for all nutrition and dietetics professionals across diverse areas of practice and will be used internally to prioritize research efforts, inform the allocation of resources across Academy units, and guide Academy advocacy for national nutrition research agendas and initiatives. This article will summarize the task force's updated research priorities and detail the 9-step process used to generate them.
引用
收藏
页码:2275 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias Summit 2019: National Research Priorities for the Investigation of Traumatic Brain Injury as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias
    Dams-O'Connor, Kristen
    Bellgowan, Patrick S. F.
    Corriveau, Roderick
    Pugh, Mary Jo
    Smith, Douglas H.
    Schneider, Julie A.
    Whitaker, Keith
    Zetterberg, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2021, 38 (23) : 3186 - 3194
  • [32] Expanding Thinking Through a Kaleidoscopic Look Into the Future: Implications of the Mixed Methods International Research Association's Task Force Report on the Future of Mixed Methods
    Mertens, Donna M.
    Bazeley, Patricia
    Bowleg, Lisa
    Fielding, Nigel
    Maxwell, Joseph
    Molina-Azorin, Jose F.
    Niglas, Katrin
    JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [33] Research priorities for expanding access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder in the United States: A National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network Task Force report (vol 42, pg 245, 2021)
    Joudrey, P. J.
    Bart, G.
    Brooner, R. K.
    Brown, L.
    Dickson-Gomez, J.
    Gordon, A.
    Kawasaki, S. S.
    Liebschutz, J. M.
    Nunes, E.
    McCarty, D.
    Schwartz, R. P.
    Szapocnik, J.
    Trivedi, M.
    Tsui, J., I
    Williams, A.
    Wu, L-T
    Fiellin, D. A.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2022, 43 (01) : 691 - 691
  • [34] Reply to Jon Mikel Inarritu, Daniele Castellani, and Jeremy YC Teoh's Letter to the Editor re: Agustina Bessa, Steven Maclennan, Deborah Enting, et al. Consensus in Bladder Cancer Research Priorities Between Patients and Healthcare Professionals Using a Four-stage Modified Delphi Method. Eur Urol 2019;76:260-1
    Bessa, Agustina
    Maclennan, Steven
    Enting, Deborah
    Bryan, Richard
    Haggstrom, Christel
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (02) : E45 - E46