Building effective Planning Support Systems for green urban water infrastructure-Practitioners' perceptions

被引:30
|
作者
Kuller, Martijn [1 ]
Farrelly, Megan [2 ]
Deletic, Ana [1 ,3 ]
Bach, Peter M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Monash Infrastruct Res Inst, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Human Geog, Sch Social Sci, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol Eawag, Uberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[5] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Water sensitive urban design; Low impact development; Planning Support Systems; Urban planning; Implementation gap; Strategic planning; DECISION-SUPPORT; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; DESIGN; TOOLS; INFORMATION; TRANSITIONS; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The multiple benefits of adopting distributed, green stormwater technologies in the local environment are increasingly recognised, particularly in relation to water quality, flood mitigation, amenity and aesthetics. To advance the integration of these systems into everyday decision-making practices, Planning Support Systems (PSS) are considered vital. Despite several PSS available to support planners and key decision-makers, their uptake remains constrained; a phenomenon known as the 'implementation gap'. While scholars have hypothesised why the adoption of PSS is limited, there remains little empirical investigation regarding the reasons why. This paper tests the hypotheses underlying the implementation gap in relation to water sensitive urban design (WSUD) planning. Drawing on the tacit experience of 24 key urban water planning professionals in the frontrunner city of Melbourne, Australia, in-depth semi-structured interviews were undertaken to unpack the contemporary planning processes used and reveal characteristics leading to success and failure of PSS application. Data analysis revealed WSUD planning professionals regard the adoption of PSS as a significant step towards improving contemporary decision-making practices, which are regarded as opportunistic rather than strategic. PSS use was widespread, though the type, intensity and sophistication of use varied among interview participants. Confirming the hypotheses from planning literature, practitioners suggested PSS need to be user-friendly and align closely to planning practice. Additionally, however, it was found that it is crucial for PSS to meet industry conventions. Suggested improvements to current PSS included incorporating socio-economic factors alongside biophysical and planning factors, hence the role for GIS-based suitability analysis tools. Overall, this study provides current and future PSS-developers with critical insights regarding the type, function and characteristics of an 'ideal' PSS aimed at enhancing the usefulness and uptake of PSS, and thus improve planning that supports expediting green infrastructure implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The shading effects of Green Infrastructure in private residential areas: Building Performance Simulation to support urban planning
    Palme, Massimo
    Privitera, Riccardo
    La Rosa, Daniele
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 229 (229)
  • [2] Green Infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions
    Lafortezza, Raffaele
    Davies, Clive
    Sanesi, Giovanni
    Konijnendijk, Cecil C.
    [J]. IFOREST-BIOGEOSCIENCES AND FORESTRY, 2013, 6 : 102 - 108
  • [3] A Systems Approach to Water Infrastructure Planning in Urban Watersheds
    Norton, Mark R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 2017: TECHNOLOGY, 2017, : 53 - 64
  • [4] Predicting context-sensitive urban green space quality to support urban green infrastructure planning
    Kajosaari, Anna
    Hasanzadeh, Kamyar
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Nummi, Pilvi
    Kuusisto-Hjort, Paula
    Kytta, Marketta
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 242
  • [5] BUILDING A COST EFFECTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE WITH GREEN HYDROGEN
    Madden, Dan
    Lowe, Tim
    [J]. FUEL CELL SEMINAR & ENERGY EXPOSITION 2015, 2016, 71 (01): : 239 - 276
  • [6] Modelling to Support the Planning of Sustainable Urban Water Systems
    Deletic, Ana
    Zhang, Kefeng
    Jamali, Behzad
    Charette-Castonguay, Adam
    Kuller, Martijn
    Prodanovic, Veljko
    Bach, Peter M.
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN URBAN DRAINAGE MODELLING, UDM 2018, 2019, : 10 - 19
  • [7] Affirmation of green infrastructure in the urban planning of Zagreb
    Matkovic, Irena
    [J]. GRADEVINAR, 2023, 75 (01): : 83 - 90
  • [8] Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning
    Ellis, J. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 56 (01) : 24 - 41
  • [9] A planning-support tool for spatial suitability assessment of green urban stormwater infrastructure
    Kuller, Martijn
    Bach, Peter M.
    Roberts, Simon
    Browne, Dale
    Deletic, Ana
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 686 : 856 - 868
  • [10] A Planning Support Tool for Layout Integral Optimization of Urban Blue-Green Infrastructure
    Zhou, Conghui
    Wu, Yun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04) : 1 - 22