Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement - Experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators

被引:61
|
作者
Glance, Laurent G. [1 ]
Osler, Turner M. [2 ]
Mukamel, Dana B. [3 ]
Dick, Andrew W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Burlington, VT USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Irvine, CA USA
[4] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
关键词
quality; risk adjustment; outcome assessment; benchmarking; administrative data; report card;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158aed6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has constructed Inpatient Quality Indicator (IQI) mortality measures to measure hospital quality using routinely available administrative data. With the exception of California, New York State, and Wisconsin, administrative data do not include a present-on-admission (POA) indicator to distinguish between preexisting conditions and complications. The extent to which the lack of a POA indicator biases quality assessment based on the AHRQ mortality measures is unknown. Objective: To examine the impact of the POA indicator on hospital quality assessment based on the AHRQ mortality measures using enhanced administrative data from California, which includes a POA indicator. Methods: Retrospective cohort study based on 2.07 million inpatient admissions between 1998 and 2000 in the California State Inpatient Database. The AHRQ IQI software was used to calculate risk-adjusted mortality rates using either (1) routine administrative data that included all the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9-CM codes or (2) enhanced administrative data that included only the ICD-9-CM codes representing preexisting conditions. Results: The inclusion of the POA indicator frequently results in changes in the quality ranking of hospitals classified as high-quality or low-quality using routine administrative data. Twenty-seven percent (stroke) to 94% (coronary artery bypass graft) of hospitals classified as high-quality using routine administrative data were reclassified as intermediate- or low-quality hospitals using the enhanced administrative data. Twenty-five percent (congestive heart failure) to 76% (percutaneous coronary intervention) of hospitals classified as low-quality hospitals using enhanced administrative data were misclassified as intermediate-quality hospitals using routine administrative data. Conclusions: Despite the fact that the AHRQ IQIs were primarily intended to serve as a screening tool, they are being increasingly used to publicly report hospital quality. Our findings emphasize the need to improve the "quality" of administrative data by including, a POA indicator if these data are to serve as the information infrastructure for quality reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring patient safety: the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's patient safety indicators
    Kelley, Ed
    Farquhar, Mary Beth
    Marano, Cinzia
    EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 2 (3-4): : 41 - 46
  • [32] Relevance of the agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators for children's hospitals
    Sedman, A
    Harris, JM
    Schulz, K
    Schwalenstocker, E
    Remus, D
    Scanlon, M
    Bahl, V
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (01) : 135 - 145
  • [33] Validity of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators at an Academic Medical Center
    Ramanathan, Rajesh
    Leavell, Patricia
    Stockslager, Gregory
    Mays, Catherine
    Harvey, Dale
    Duane, Therese M.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2013, 79 (06) : 578 - 582
  • [34] From publication to public action: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) perspectives on ethnicity and race-related outcomes research
    Clancy, C
    Stryer, D
    Eisenberg, JM
    ETHNICITY & HEALTH, 2002, 7 (04) : 287 - 290
  • [35] Should indicators be correlated? Formative indicators for healthcare quality measurement
    Blotenberg, Iris
    Schang, Laura
    Boywitt, Dennis
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [36] Measurement of healthcare quality in atopic dermatitis - development and application of a set of quality indicators
    Steinke, S.
    Beikert, F. C.
    Langenbruch, A.
    Foelster-Holst, R.
    Ring, J.
    Schmitt, J.
    Werfel, T.
    Hintzen, S.
    Franzke, N.
    Augustin, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2018, 32 (12) : 2237 - 2243
  • [37] A comparison of two quality measurement tools in pediatric surgery-The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric versus the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Pediatric Quality Indicators
    Polites, Stephanie F.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Zarroug, Abdalla E.
    Wagie, Amy E.
    Cima, Robert R.
    Wiskerchen, Rebecca
    Moir, Christopher R.
    Ishitani, Michael B.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2015, 50 (04) : 586 - 590
  • [39] Draft Formal Response to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Technical Brief on Neurothrombectomy Devices in Acute Ischemic Stroke
    Khalessi, Alexander A.
    Natarajan, Sabareesh K.
    Binning, Mandy J.
    Siddiqui, Adnan S.
    Levy, Elad
    Hopkins, L. Nelson
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 73 (06) : 612 - 621
  • [40] Impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Safety Program for Perinatal Care
    Kahwati, Leila C.
    Sorensen, Asta V.
    Teixeira-Poit, Stephanie
    Jacobs, Sara
    Sommerness, Samantha A.
    Miller, Kristi K.
    Pleasants, Elizabeth
    Clare, Hanna Margaret
    Hirt, Charles L.
    Davis, Stanley E.
    Ivester, Thomas
    Caldwell, Donna
    Muri, Janet H.
    Mistry, Kamila B.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2019, 45 (04): : 231 - 240