Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement - Experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators

被引:61
|
作者
Glance, Laurent G. [1 ]
Osler, Turner M. [2 ]
Mukamel, Dana B. [3 ]
Dick, Andrew W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Burlington, VT USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Irvine, CA USA
[4] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
关键词
quality; risk adjustment; outcome assessment; benchmarking; administrative data; report card;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158aed6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has constructed Inpatient Quality Indicator (IQI) mortality measures to measure hospital quality using routinely available administrative data. With the exception of California, New York State, and Wisconsin, administrative data do not include a present-on-admission (POA) indicator to distinguish between preexisting conditions and complications. The extent to which the lack of a POA indicator biases quality assessment based on the AHRQ mortality measures is unknown. Objective: To examine the impact of the POA indicator on hospital quality assessment based on the AHRQ mortality measures using enhanced administrative data from California, which includes a POA indicator. Methods: Retrospective cohort study based on 2.07 million inpatient admissions between 1998 and 2000 in the California State Inpatient Database. The AHRQ IQI software was used to calculate risk-adjusted mortality rates using either (1) routine administrative data that included all the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9-CM codes or (2) enhanced administrative data that included only the ICD-9-CM codes representing preexisting conditions. Results: The inclusion of the POA indicator frequently results in changes in the quality ranking of hospitals classified as high-quality or low-quality using routine administrative data. Twenty-seven percent (stroke) to 94% (coronary artery bypass graft) of hospitals classified as high-quality using routine administrative data were reclassified as intermediate- or low-quality hospitals using the enhanced administrative data. Twenty-five percent (congestive heart failure) to 76% (percutaneous coronary intervention) of hospitals classified as low-quality hospitals using enhanced administrative data were misclassified as intermediate-quality hospitals using routine administrative data. Conclusions: Despite the fact that the AHRQ IQIs were primarily intended to serve as a screening tool, they are being increasingly used to publicly report hospital quality. Our findings emphasize the need to improve the "quality" of administrative data by including, a POA indicator if these data are to serve as the information infrastructure for quality reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hospital Characteristics and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Inpatient Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review
    Engineer, Lilly D.
    Winters, Bradford D.
    Weston, Christine M.
    Zhang, Allen
    Sharma, Ritu
    Bass, Eric
    Jones, David
    Rosen, Amy
    Yoon, Frank B.
    Borzecki, Ann
    Dy, Sydney M.
    JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2016, 38 (05) : 304 - 313
  • [2] Nursing and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ): An agenda
    Walker, PH
    Hubbard, H
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2003, 51 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [3] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Web site
    Carlson, Elizabeth A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2008, 27 (04) : 258 - 259
  • [4] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicator #11 Fails to Provide Accurate Assessment of Mortality After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Robinson, William P.
    Huang, Wei
    Rosen, Amy
    Schanzer, Andres
    Fang, Hua
    Anderson, Frederick
    Messina, Louis
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (06) : 12S - 12S
  • [5] Are the agency for healthcare research and quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital quality?
    Grobman, W
    Feinglass, J
    Murthy, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S179 - S179
  • [6] The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Pediatric Quality Indicators (PDIs) Accidental Puncture or Laceration During Surgery in Children
    Camp, Melissa
    Chang, David C.
    Zhang, Yiyi
    Chrouser, Kristin
    Colombani, Paul M.
    Abdullah, Fizan
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (01) : 165 - 176
  • [7] Impact of Present-on-admission Indicators on Risk-adjusted Hospital Mortality Measurement
    Dalton, Jarrod E.
    Glance, Laurent G.
    Mascha, Edward J.
    Ehrlinger, John
    Chamoun, Nassib
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 118 (06) : 1298 - 1306
  • [8] Evaluation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality pediatric quality indicators
    Scanlon, Matthew C.
    Harris, J. Mitchell
    Levy, Fiona
    Sedman, Aileen
    PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (06) : E1723 - E1731
  • [9] Approach to Improving Quality: the Role of Quality Measurement and a Case Study of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Pediatric Quality Indicators
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 56 (04) : 815 - +
  • [10] Moving the Needle on Measurement of Patient Safety: The Evolving Role of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators
    Rosen, Amy K.
    Rivard, Peter E.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2025, 51 (03): : 229 - 231