Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations

被引:47
|
作者
Cohen, L. B. [1 ]
Sanyal, S. M. [1 ]
von Althann, C. [1 ]
Bodian, C. [2 ]
Whitson, M. [1 ]
Bamji, N. [1 ]
Miller, K. M. [1 ]
Mavronicolas, W. [1 ]
Burd, S. [1 ]
Freedman, J. [1 ]
Aisenberg, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med Gastroenterol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
BOWEL PREPARATION; SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; QUALITY; VOLUME; BISACODYL; IMPACT; MULTICENTER; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04390.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) lavage solutions provide efficacy similar to that of standard 4-L PEG formulations in spite of the reduced volume. The comparative efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of 2-L PEG solution remain unknown. Aims To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PEG + Bis compared with PEG + Asc, and to study the effect of bowel cleansing quality on adenoma detection rates. Methods Patients were randomized to receive either 2-L PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) or 2-L PEG plus bisacodyl 10 mg (PEG + Bis). The primary endpoint was overall colon cleansing score, assessed by blinded investigators using a validated four-point scale. Secondary endpoints included adenoma detection rate, patient tolerability and compliance and adverse events. Results Fifty-two patients received PEG + Asc and 55 patients received PEG + Bis. Overall colon cleansing scores (+/- s.d.) were 1.40 +/- 0.69 and 1.75 +/- 0.70 (P < 0.003) in the PEG + Asc and PEG + Bis groups, respectively. Excellent and good ratings were recorded in 69% and 23% receiving PEG + Asc compared to 38% and 51% (P = 0.01) of patients receiving PEG + Bis. More adenomas were detected in colonoscopies performed with PEG + Asc (39%) than in those performed with PEG + Bis (20%) (P = 0.04). Patient tolerability and safety were similar with both preparations. Conclusion The use of PEG + Asc resulted in better colon cleansing and higher adenoma detection rates compared with PEG + Bis.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 644
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Compliance of Oral Sulfate Solution and 2-L Ascorbic Acid Plus Polyethylene Glycol in Korean.
    Lim, Yun Jeong
    Park, Jong-Jae
    Kwon, Ki Hwan
    Lee, Ji Ae
    Lee, Beom Jae
    Joo, Moon Kyung
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB262 - AB262
  • [42] Split dose versus full single-dose regimen of polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation in pediatric colonoscopy: a pilot study of randomized controlled trial
    Sriphongphankul, Hansa
    Tanpowpong, Pornthep
    Lertudomphonwanit, Chatmanee
    Treepongkaruna, Suporn
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 31 (11) : 1382 - 1386
  • [43] Clinical trial: the efficacy and safety of routine bowel cleansing agents for elective colonoscopy in persons with spinal cord injury - a randomized prospective single-blind study
    Ancha, H. R.
    Spungen, A. M.
    Bauman, W. A.
    Rosman, A. S.
    Shaw, S.
    Hunt, K. K.
    Post, J. B.
    Galea, M.
    Korsten, M. A.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 30 (11-12) : 1110 - 1117
  • [44] Comparative efficacy of combination of 1L polyethylene glycol, castor oil and ascorbic acid versus 2L polyethylene glycol plus castor oil versus 3L polyethylene glycol for colon cleansing before colonoscopy: Study protocol of a randomized, double-blind, single-center study
    Tian, Xu
    Chen, Wei-Qing
    Liu, Xiao-Ling
    Chen, Hui
    Liu, Bang-Lun
    Pi, Yuan-Ping
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (17)
  • [45] Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and tolerability of two different split dose of low-volume polyethylene glycol electrolytes for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in hospitalized children
    Fang, Shengbo
    Song, Yanqing
    Liu, Yufei
    Wang, Libo
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2021, 90 (01) : 171 - 175
  • [46] Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and tolerability of two different split dose of low-volume polyethylene glycol electrolytes for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in hospitalized children
    Shengbo Fang
    Yanqing Song
    Yufei Liu
    Libo Wang
    Pediatric Research, 2021, 90 : 171 - 175
  • [47] One Liter Polyethylene Glycol-Based NER1006 Is Efficacious as a Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Patients With or Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized, Phase 3 Studies
    Schoenfeld, Philip S.
    Poppers, David M.
    Cash, Brooks D.
    Allen, Christopher
    Sharma, Prateek
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S115 - S115
  • [48] Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate
    DeMicco, Michael P.
    Clayton, Lucy B.
    Pilot, Jeff
    Epstein, Michael S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (03) : 677 - +
  • [49] Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of elobixibat plus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate and split-dose 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation before outpatient colonoscopy: a study protocol for the multicentre, randomised, controlled E-PLUS trial
    Kinichi Hotta
    Yosuke Otake
    Daisuke Yamaguchi
    Yuichi Shimodate
    Norihiro Hanabata
    Hiroaki Ikematsu
    Yohei Yabuuchi
    Yasushi Sano
    Ryo Shimoda
    Shinya Sugimoto
    Mari Oba
    Hiroyuki Takamaru
    Kouichiro Kimura
    Yoshihiro Kishida
    Kazunori Takada
    Sayo Ito
    Kenichiro Imai
    Kazuya Hosotani
    Tatsuro Murano
    Masayoshi Yamada
    Kensuke Shinmura
    Rio Takezawa
    Michito Tomonaga
    Yutaka Saito
    BMC Gastroenterology, 24
  • [50] A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of DCL-101, a Novel Pill-Based Colonoscopy Prep, vs 4L Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution
    Bachwich, Dale R.
    Lewis, James D.
    Kowal, Vera O.
    Jacobson, Brian C.
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Kochman, Michael L.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 11 (12) : e00264