Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations

被引:47
|
作者
Cohen, L. B. [1 ]
Sanyal, S. M. [1 ]
von Althann, C. [1 ]
Bodian, C. [2 ]
Whitson, M. [1 ]
Bamji, N. [1 ]
Miller, K. M. [1 ]
Mavronicolas, W. [1 ]
Burd, S. [1 ]
Freedman, J. [1 ]
Aisenberg, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med Gastroenterol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
BOWEL PREPARATION; SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; QUALITY; VOLUME; BISACODYL; IMPACT; MULTICENTER; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04390.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) lavage solutions provide efficacy similar to that of standard 4-L PEG formulations in spite of the reduced volume. The comparative efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of 2-L PEG solution remain unknown. Aims To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PEG + Bis compared with PEG + Asc, and to study the effect of bowel cleansing quality on adenoma detection rates. Methods Patients were randomized to receive either 2-L PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) or 2-L PEG plus bisacodyl 10 mg (PEG + Bis). The primary endpoint was overall colon cleansing score, assessed by blinded investigators using a validated four-point scale. Secondary endpoints included adenoma detection rate, patient tolerability and compliance and adverse events. Results Fifty-two patients received PEG + Asc and 55 patients received PEG + Bis. Overall colon cleansing scores (+/- s.d.) were 1.40 +/- 0.69 and 1.75 +/- 0.70 (P < 0.003) in the PEG + Asc and PEG + Bis groups, respectively. Excellent and good ratings were recorded in 69% and 23% receiving PEG + Asc compared to 38% and 51% (P = 0.01) of patients receiving PEG + Bis. More adenomas were detected in colonoscopies performed with PEG + Asc (39%) than in those performed with PEG + Bis (20%) (P = 0.04). Patient tolerability and safety were similar with both preparations. Conclusion The use of PEG + Asc resulted in better colon cleansing and higher adenoma detection rates compared with PEG + Bis.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 644
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage and Split Dose Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage in the Preparation of Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
    Mohamed, Rachid
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Dube, Catherine
    Gillett, Breanna
    Rostom, Alaa
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S570 - S570
  • [2] A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy
    Rostom, Alaa
    Jolicoeur, Emilie
    Dube, Catherine
    Gregoire, Sylvie
    Patel, Dilip
    Saloojee, Navaaz
    Lowe, Catherine
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (04) : 544 - 552
  • [3] Oral sodium phosphate solution versus polyethylene glycol-based lavage for bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A multicenter trial
    Schanz, S
    Kruis, W
    Miekisch, O
    Kueppers, B
    Hornung, A
    Buch-Noethe, S
    Clement, T
    Boerner, N
    Berg, P
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (05) : AB103 - AB103
  • [4] A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation
    El Sayed, AMA
    Kanafani, ZA
    Mourad, FH
    Soweid, AM
    Barada, KA
    Adorian, CS
    Nasreddine, WA
    Sharara, AI
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [5] Efficacy of Lubiprostone Used with Polyethylene Glycol to Enhance Colonoscopy Preparation Quality in Diabetic Patients: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial
    Grigg, Erika
    Schubert, Moonkyung
    Hall, Joshua
    Sridhar, Subbaramiah
    Chamberlain, Sherman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S505 - S505
  • [6] A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL COMPARING ORAL SODIUM-PHOSPHATE WITH STANDARD POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL-BASED LAVAGE SOLUTION (GOLYTELY) IN THE PREPARATION OF PATIENTS FOR COLONOSCOPY
    VANNER, SJ
    MACDONALD, PH
    PATERSON, WG
    PRENTICE, RSA
    DACOSTA, LR
    BECK, IT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 85 (04): : 422 - 427
  • [7] A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation
    Soweid, A. M.
    Kobeissy, A. A.
    Jamali, F. R.
    El-Tarchichi, M.
    Skoury, A.
    Abdul-Baki, H.
    El-Zahabi, L.
    El-Sayyed, A.
    Barada, K. A.
    Sharara, A. I.
    Mourad, F.
    Arabi, A.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (08) : 633 - 638
  • [8] Comparison of the Effectiveness Between a Solution of Sulfate Salts and Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopy and Randomized, Single-Blind Study
    Kmochova, Klara
    Grega, Tomas
    Ngo, Ondrej
    Majek, Ondrej
    Zavoral, Miroslav
    Suchanek, Stepan
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB258 - AB258
  • [9] A Randomized Trial of Split Dose 3 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution, 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Combined With Castor Oil, and 1 L of Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution Combined With Castor Oil and Ascorbic Acid for Preparation for Colonoscopy
    Tian, Xu
    Shi, Bing
    Liu, Xiao-Ling
    Chen, Hui
    Chen, Wei-Qing
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 6
  • [10] Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Szojda, Maria M.
    Kuik, Dirk J.
    Mulder, Chris J. J.
    Felt-Bersma, Richelle J. F.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 43 (05) : 622 - 626