Effect of mica on particle-size analyses using the laser diffraction technique

被引:22
|
作者
Hayton, S
Nelson, CS
Ricketts, BD
Cooke, S
Wedd, MW
机构
[1] GeoSphere Explorat Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Waikato, Dept Earth Sci, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Univ Southampton, Sch Ocean & Earth Sci, Southampton SO14 3ZH, Hants, England
[4] Malvern Instruments Ltd, Malvern WR14 1XZ, Worcs, England
来源
JOURNAL OF SEDIMENTARY RESEARCH | 2001年 / 71卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1306/2DC4095B-0E47-11D7-8643000102C1865D
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
New sizing technologies commonly make particle-size analyses more routine, simpler, and less time consuming. The proliferation of new technologies led Syvitski et al, (1991) to recommend that "new particle size instruments should no longer have their results compared with those of the classical methods of sieving and pipetting." However, care is required to ensure that results are broadly comparable to those obtained using established methodologies, especially where sediment classification and environmental processes are being interpreted using traditional schemes. The progressive development of new classification schemes based on modern particle-size analysis techniques will eventually mitigate this problem. Laser particle size analyses of Upper Neogene micaceous terrigenous deposits from New Zealand have yielded some significantly different grain-size distributions compared to traditional sieving methods. These differences typically escalated with increasing sand content, h series of test samples spiked with increasing amounts of mica demonstrate that very small amounts of mica ( 2 wt%) have the potential to significantly alter the grain size characteristics obtained using a laser particle sizer compared to sieve analyses. This is probably due to the mica particles having (a) a higher light-scattering property, and (b) large numbers of particles per unit volume, resulting in mica being overestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 509
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pedotransfer functions for converting laser diffraction particle-size data to conventional values
    Mako, A.
    Toth, G.
    Weynants, M.
    Rajkai, K.
    Hermann, T.
    Toth, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2017, 68 (05) : 769 - 782
  • [22] Particle-Size Analysis of Modern Bottom Sediments by the Laser Diffraction and Sieve Methods
    V. M. Shulkin
    A. Yu. Strukov
    Russian Journal of Pacific Geology, 2020, 14 : 378 - 386
  • [23] Particle-Size Analysis of Modern Bottom Sediments by the Laser Diffraction and Sieve Methods
    Shulkin, V. M.
    Strukov, A. Yu
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PACIFIC GEOLOGY, 2020, 14 (04) : 378 - 386
  • [24] AN IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR PARTICLE-SIZE MEASUREMENT
    HOFFMAN, RL
    JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1991, 143 (01) : 232 - 251
  • [25] GEL TECHNIQUE FOR PARTICLE-SIZE SAMPLING
    BLACKINT.RJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1973, : 13 - +
  • [26] MEASUREMENTS OF FINE PARTICLE-SIZE USING A SPECKLE CORRELATION TECHNIQUE
    NITTA, H
    ASAKURA, T
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 1 (02) : 131 - 135
  • [27] PARTICLE-SIZE MEASUREMENT BY LASER ANEMOMETRY
    UNGUT, A
    YULE, AJ
    TAYLOR, DS
    CHIGIER, NA
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY, 1978, 2 (06): : 330 - 336
  • [28] BIAS IN PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSES BY COUNT METHOD
    GWYN, JE
    CROSBY, EJ
    MARSHALL, WR
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FUNDAMENTALS, 1965, 4 (02): : 204 - &
  • [29] LASER PHOTOMETER FOR PARTICLE-SIZE MEASUREMENTS
    HARRIS, FS
    MORSE, FL
    TALIAFER.NG
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1969, 59 (11) : 1518 - &
  • [30] The effect of organic matter on the difference between particle-size distribution data obtained by the sedimentometric and laser diffraction methods
    E. V. Shein
    E. Yu. Milanovskii
    A. Z. Molov
    Eurasian Soil Science, 2006, 39 : S84 - S90