Acquisition and transfer of attention allocation strategies in a multiple-task work environment

被引:16
|
作者
Wang, Dong-Yuan Debbie [1 ]
Proctor, Robert W.
Pick, David F.
机构
[1] Univ N Florida, Dept Psychol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ Calumet, Hammond, LA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1518/001872007X249866
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: Payoff effects on strategy development and change were assessed in a synthetic work environment, SYNWORK1. Background: Many work settings require several tasks to be performed concurrently. It is important to know how the strategies used in performing the respective tasks vary with payoffs. Method: Sixty students performed four tasks in SYNWORK1, for which points are received for correct responses and lost for incorrect responses. Individual-task payoffs were varied between participants and were changed after 8 and 12 sessions to examine the effects of a previous strategy on development of a new strategy. Results: Participants were sensitive to initial payoffs and modified their strategies when payoffs changed. However, residual effects of prior payoffs were evident. Conclusion: Payoffs for multiple-task environments need to be explicit, and practice should be provided for strategy development. When payoffs change, strategies adopted reflect current and previous payoffs. Application: The findings can be applied to the design of payoff schedules for multiple-task environments.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1004
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Research on Multiple AUVs Task Allocation with Energy Constraints in Underwater Search Environment
    Wang, Hailin
    Li, Yiping
    Li, Shuo
    Xu, Gaopeng
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [22] Is a structured work task application for the assessment of work performance in a constructed environment, useful for patients with attention deficits?
    Landahl, Kristina Sargenius
    Sandqvist, Jan
    Bartfai, Aniko
    Schult, Marie-Louise
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (12) : 1699 - 1709
  • [23] Multi-Agent Task Allocation with Multiple Depots Using Graph Attention Pointer Network
    Shi, Wen
    Yu, Chengpu
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (16)
  • [24] Specifying relations between research and the practice of solving applied problems: An illustration from the planning and control of multiple-task work in medical reception
    Long, J
    ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVII: COGNITIVE REGULATION OF PERFORMANCE: INTERACTION OF THEORY AND APPLICATION, 1999, 17 : 259 - 284
  • [25] COMPETENCE AND TASK ALLOCATION IN A SIMULATED WORK-ENVIRONMENT - ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
    ETZION, D
    SEGEV, E
    SIMULATION & GAMING, 1984, 15 (04) : 395 - 413
  • [26] Task Allocation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Deep Transfer Reinforcement Learning
    Yin, Yongfeng
    Guo, Yang
    Su, Qingran
    Wang, Zhetao
    DRONES, 2022, 6 (08)
  • [27] Review on state-of-the-art dynamic task allocation strategies for multiple-robot systems
    Seenu, N.
    Chetty, Kuppan R. M.
    Ramya, M. M.
    Janardhanan, Mukund Nilakantan
    INDUSTRIAL ROBOT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 2020, 47 (06): : 929 - 942
  • [28] Collaborative Production Task Decomposition and Allocation among Multiple Manufacturing Enterprises in a Big Data Environment
    Li, Feng
    Li, Xiya
    Yang, Yun
    Xu, Yan
    Zhang, Yan
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (12):
  • [29] Levelized Multiple Workflow Allocation Strategy Under Precedence Constraints With Task Merging in IaaS Cloud Environment
    Ahmad, Faisal
    Shahid, Mohammad
    Alam, Mahfooz
    Ashraf, Zubair
    Sajid, Mohammad
    Kotecha, Ketan
    Dhiman, Gaurav
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 92809 - 92827
  • [30] Effects of Workload and Workload Transitions on Attention Allocation in a Dual-Task Environment: Evidence From Eye Tracking Metrics
    Moacdieh, Nadine Marie
    Devlin, Shannon P.
    Jundi, Hussein
    Riggs, Sara Lu
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 14 (02) : 132 - 151