Ultrathin CAD-CAM glass-ceramic and composite resin occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion: An up to 3-year randomized clinical trial

Statement of problem. Ultrathin bonded posterior occlusal veneers represent a conservative alternative to traditional onlays and complete coverage crowns for the treatment of erosive dental wear. Data regarding the clinical performance of ceramic and composite resin ultrathin occlusal veneers are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the influence of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative material (ceramic versus composite resin) on the clinical performance of ultrathin occlusal veneers bonded to worn posterior teeth. Material and methods. Eleven participants (mean age, 30.4 years) had their posterior teeth restored with 24 ceramic (e.max CAD) and 36 composite resin (Lava Ultimate) ultrathin occlusal veneers. The material type was assigned randomly. The tooth preparations were trial restoration driven and included immediate dentin sealing (OptiBond FL). The intaglio surfaces of the ceramic restorations were etched with hydrofluoric acid and silanated, and the composite resins were airborne-particle abraded and silanated. The tooth preparations were airborne-particle abraded and etched with phosphoric acid before restoration insertion. All restorations were adhesively luted with preheated composite resin (Filtek Z100). The participants were evaluated according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria at baseline and then each year for up to 3 years. Survival rates were estimated with time to failure (primary outcome of interest) as the endpoint (scores 4 or 5). Results. No restorations were lost. Five partial failures, in the form of chipping (all scored 4), were observed in the composite resin group (Lava Ultimate). The Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 100% for ceramic and 84.7% (SE 0.065%) for composite resin. Differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (P=.124). In the surviving restorations, significant difference (P=.003) was found for surface roughness as restorations in the composite resin group experienced some surface degradation. Conclusions. The findings of this medium-term clinical trial suggest that ceramic (e.max CAD) and composite resin (Lava Ultimate) CAD-CAM ultrathin occlusal veneers presented statistically comparable performance regardless of the minor partial failures (restorable chipping) observed in the composite resin group. Higher surface degradation was observed in the composite resin group.