Assessing Higher Education Policy in Brazil: A Mixed Oligopoly Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Del Rey, Elena [1 ]
Estevan, Fernanda [2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Ciencies Econ & Empresarials, Carrer Univ Girona 10, Girona 17003, Spain
[2] Sao Paulo Sch Econ FGV, Rua Itapeva 474, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
higher education; exams; fees; borrowing constraints; PRIVATE HIGHER-EDUCATION; QUALITY; EQUILIBRIUM; COMPETITION; DUOPOLY; PRICE; STATE;
D O I
10.1515/bejeap-2019-0240
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Higher education is increasingly provided by both public and private universities, in particular in the developing world. Considering a mixed oligopoly setting and inspired by the Brazilian context, we explore the relative merits of some frequently used higher education policies in a context where a high-quality public university interacts with a lower-quality private university. We calibrate the model to match relevant values of Brazilian earnings and educational distribution. Subsidising private university tuition fees increases participation, but many high ability students remain excluded, especially if the subsidy is substantial. Affirmative action improves the surplus associated with the public university system, as more high ability individuals attend the public university, but virtually does not increase higher education participation. Although an expansion of public university places induces a reduction in private university fees, total university enrolment grows slowly, and many high-ability individuals cannot obtain a university education.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Market integration and location choice: a mixed oligopoly approach
    Hikaru Ogawa
    Yasuo Sanjo
    Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 2011, 4 (3) : 157 - 166
  • [32] Neoliberalism and Higher Education in Brazil
    Ribeiro, Gustavo Lins
    ANTHROPOLOGY IN ACTION-JOURNAL FOR APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY IN POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 12 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [33] Regulation of Education Market Access Based on Mixed Oligopoly Model
    Chen, Junlong
    Xu, Liuchang
    Mo, Feifan
    Bian, Zhiying
    EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES-THEORY & PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (05): : 1389 - 1399
  • [34] Assessing quality in higher education
    Pachter, Manuela
    Braun, Edith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 751 - 751
  • [35] Assessing the Future of Higher Education
    Pallas, Aaron M.
    SOCIETY, 2011, 48 (03) : 213 - 215
  • [36] Assessing the Future of Higher Education
    Aaron M. Pallas
    Society, 2011, 48 : 213 - 215
  • [37] A MULTIPHASE MIXED METHOD APPROACH TO ASSESS INTERNATIONALISATON OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICIES
    Steynberg, L.
    Grundling, J. P.
    Liu, B.
    Li, Y.
    EDULEARN19: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, : 8397 - 8406
  • [38] Priority setting in higher education research using a mixed methods approach
    Choi, Tammie
    Palermo, Claire
    Sarkar, Mahbub
    Whitton, Joy
    Rees, Charlotte
    Clemans, Allie
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 42 (04) : 816 - 830
  • [39] A question of autonomy: Bourdieu's field approach and higher education policy
    Maton, K
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2005, 20 (06) : 687 - 704
  • [40] POLICY CHANGE IN AUSTRIAN HIGHER-EDUCATION - INDICATIONS OF A NEW APPROACH
    GRUBER, KH
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 1991, 21 (04) : 607 - 619