Robust Adaptive Impedance Control With Application to a Transfemoral Prosthesis and Test Robot

被引:18
|
作者
Azimi, Vahid [1 ]
Fakoorian, Seyed Abolfazl [2 ]
Thang Tien Nguyen [3 ]
Simon, Dan [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Cleveland State Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
[3] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Elect & Elect Engn, Modeling Evolutionary Algorithms Simulat & Artifi, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
robust adaptive impedance control; transfemoral prosthesis; nonscalar boundary layer trajectories; VIRTUAL CONSTRAINT CONTROL; WALKING; SYSTEM; VARIABILITY; DESIGN; TIME; LEG;
D O I
10.1115/1.4040463
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents, compares, and tests two robust model reference adaptive impedance controllers for a three degrees-of-freedom (3DOF) powered prosthesis/test robot. We first present a model for a combined system that includes a test robot and a transfemoral prosthetic leg. We design these two controllers, so the error trajectories of the system converge to a boundary layer and the controllers show robustness to ground reaction forces (GRFs) as nonparametric uncertainties and also handle model parameter uncertainties. We prove the stability of the closed-loop systems for both controllers for the prosthesis/test robot in the case of nonscalar boundary layer trajectories using Lyapunov stability theory and Barbalat's lemma. We design the controllers to imitate the biomechanical properties of able-bodied walking and to provide smooth gait. We finally present simulation results to confirm the efficacy of the controllers for both nominal and off-nominal system model parameters. We achieve good tracking of joint displacements and velocities, and reasonable control and GRF magnitudes for both controllers. We also compare performance of the controllers in terms of tracking, control effort, and parameter estimation for both nominal and off-nominal model parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ON ADAPTIVE IMPEDANCE CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS
    KELLY, R
    CARELLI, R
    AMESTEGUI, M
    ORTEGA, R
    PROCEEDINGS - 1989 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL 1-3, 1989, : 572 - 577
  • [22] A Robust Adaptive Impedance Control of Robots
    Nazmara, Gholamreza
    Fateh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Ahmadi, Seyed Mohammad
    2018 6TH RSI INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS (ICROM 2018), 2018, : 40 - 45
  • [23] ADAPTIVE ROBUST MODEL-FOLLOWING CONTROL AND APPLICATION TO ROBOT MANIPULATORS
    CHEN, YH
    JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (03): : 209 - 215
  • [24] On robust impedance force control of robot manipulators
    Jung, S
    Hsia, TC
    Bonitz, RG
    1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, 1997, : 2057 - 2062
  • [25] Robust adaptive control of robot manipulators
    Laib, A
    LamnabhiLagarrigue, F
    SYSTEM STRUCTURE AND CONTROL 1995, 1996, : 331 - 334
  • [26] A robust adaptive control of a parallel robot
    Achili, B.
    Daachi, B.
    Amirat, Y.
    Ali-cherif, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2010, 83 (10) : 2107 - 2119
  • [27] Impedance Control of a Transfemoral Prosthesis using Continuously Varying Ankle Impedances and Multiple Equilibria
    Kumar, Namita Anil
    Hong, Woolim
    Hur, Pilwon
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2020, : 1755 - 1761
  • [28] MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF IMPEDANCE PARAMETERS IN A PROSTHESIS TEST ROBOT
    Khalaf, Poya
    Richter, Hanz
    van den Bogert, Antonie J.
    Simon, Dan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 8TH ANNUAL DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 3, 2016,
  • [29] DIRECT ADAPTIVE IMPEDANCE CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS
    COLBAUGH, R
    SERAJI, H
    GLASS, K
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 1993, 10 (02): : 217 - 248
  • [30] Adaptive Impedance Control for Safe Robot Manipulator
    Luo, Ren C.
    Huang, Han B.
    Yi, Chun Y.
    Perng, Yi W.
    2011 9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA 2011), 2011, : 1146 - 1151