Young stand growth modeling for intensively-managed loblolly pine plantations in southeastern US

被引:0
|
作者
Westfall, JA
Burkhart, HE
Allen, HL
机构
[1] USDA, US Forest Serv, Northeastern Res Stn, Newtown Sq, PA 19073 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Forestry, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
site preparation; competition control; onset of competition; growth and yield; fertilization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Intensively managed loblolly pine stands are often subjected to a variety of silvicultural treatments at time of planting or shortly thereafter. However, most loblolly pine growth-and-yield models predict growth after crown closure has occurred. In this article, we describe the development and implementation of a system of equations designed to simulate growth of loblolly pine before the onset of intraspecific competition. Treatment response functions were also developed for various site preparation, herbaceous weed control, and fertilization practices. These functions modify the baseline model predictions to simulate the effects of treatments on tree growth and stand development. This system was incorporated into the PTAEDA2 growth-and-yield simulator to make growth projections from time of planting through rotation age for intensively managed stands of loblolly pine in the southeastern United States. Growth simulations specifying either bedding or disking showed increases in volume growth for both treatments. The shear-and-pile site-preparation method reduced growth rates slightly. Volume growth responses to herbaceous weed control were positive, with magnitude of increase largely depending on duration of treatment. Increases in volume attributable to fertilization at planting were related to types of element applied. The largest predicted response was for phosphorus fertilization, whereas application of potassium was the least effective fertilization treatment. Site preparation, weed control, and fertilization treatment combinations produced additional volume gains when compared to single treatments, while maintaining predicted values that are within biological limits for loblolly pine growth. Levels of response to treatments are consistent with results from published studies on intensive management practices. The addition of the precompetitive growth system did not significantly affect the predictive behavior of the PTAEDA2 model for untreated stands.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 835
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A New Site Index Model for Intensively Managed Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Plantations in the West Gulf Coastal Plain
    Trim, Kynda R.
    Coble, Dean W.
    Weng, Yuhui
    Stovall, Jeremy P.
    Hung, I-Kuai
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (01) : 2 - 13
  • [22] NEEDLEFALL RETURNS AND RESORPTION RATES OF NUTRIENTS IN YOUNG INTENSIVELY MANAGED SLASH AND LOBLOLLY-PINE STANDS
    DALLATEA, F
    JOKELA, EJ
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (04) : 650 - 662
  • [23] NEEDLEFALL, CANOPY LIGHT INTERCEPTION, AND PRODUCTIVITY OF YOUNG INTENSIVELY MANAGED SLASH AND LOBLOLLY-PINE STANDS
    DALLATEA, F
    JOKELA, EJ
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (05) : 1298 - 1313
  • [24] Breeding bird communities associated with land cover in intensively managed pine forests of the southeastern US
    Parrish, Michael C.
    Demarais, Steve
    Wigley, T. Bently
    Jones, Phillip D.
    Ezell, Andrew W.
    Riffell, Samuel K.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 406 : 112 - 124
  • [25] Optimal nitrogen application rates for three intensively-managed hardwood tree species in the southeastern USA
    Coyle, David R.
    Aubrey, Doug P.
    Siry, Jacek P.
    Volfovicz-Leon, Roberto R.
    Coleman, Mark D.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 303 : 131 - 142
  • [26] Growth and yield model comparisons for mid-rotation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern US
    Peay, W. Spencer
    Bullock, Bronson P.
    Montes, Cristian R.
    [J]. FORESTRY, 2022, 95 (05): : 616 - 633
  • [27] Breeding bird community response to establishing intercropped switchgrass in intensively-managed pine stands
    Loman, Zachary G.
    Riffell, Samuel K.
    Wheat, Bradley R.
    Miller, Darren A.
    Martin, James A.
    Vilella, Francisco J.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 67 : 201 - 211
  • [28] Factors influencing production efficiency of intensively managed loblolly pine plantations in a 1-to 4-year-old chronosequence
    Adegbidi, HG
    Jokela, EJ
    Comerford, NB
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 218 (1-3) : 245 - 258
  • [29] Assessing change in soil-site productivity of intensively managed loblolly pine plantations (vol 70, pg 130, 2006)
    Eisenbies, MH
    Burger, JA
    Aust, WM
    Patterson, SC
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (03) : 1037 - 1037
  • [30] Growth and yield drivers of loblolly pine in the southeastern US: A meta-analysis
    Restrepo, Hector I.
    Bullock, Bronson P.
    Montes, Cristian R.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 435 : 205 - 218