Waste Recycling under Take-back and Tax/Subsidy Mechanisms

被引:0
|
作者
Tsai, Tsung-Hsiu [1 ]
Wu, Shih-Jye [2 ]
Hwang, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Kaohsiung, Dept Appl Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Polit Econ, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
关键词
waste management; extended producer responsibility; recycling rate; recycling market; output tax and recycling subsidy; DISPOSAL; POLICIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the implementation of extended producer responsibility (EPR) principle on waste management, some countries use a take-back mandate mechanism in which manufacturers bear responsibility to recycle their products till they reach a mandated recycling rate level. Other countries follow a tax/subsidy mechanism in which manufacturers pay an advance disposal fees; the government intervenes in transferring the payment received from manufacturers to subsidize the recycling sector. The purpose of this paper is to compare the relative performance of these two EPR mechanisms on the waste recycling rate. We found that when the recycling technology is relatively efficient, the recycling rate is higher under the tax/subsidy mechanism than the take back mandate mechanism. This result is reversed when the recycling technology becomes less efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incentive Regulation of Construction Waste Resource Recycling: Subsidy and Tax Incentive
    Xiang, Qing
    Jing, Zhang
    Ruwen, Tan
    Minjiu, Yu
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [22] Integrated Information Systems of E-waste Take-back Supply Chain
    Xu, Zhiduan
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 6233 - 6237
  • [23] Remanufacturing supply chain decision under the constraints of take-back laws
    Ji, Guo-Jun
    Huang, Wei-Wang
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2010, 30 (08): : 1355 - 1362
  • [24] Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective?: The environmental impacts of the Swiss take-back and recycling systems for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)
    Hischier, R
    Wäger, P
    Gauglhofer, J
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2005, 25 (05) : 525 - 539
  • [25] EU set to propose take-back legislation
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1999, 77 (36) : 24 - 24
  • [26] Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry
    Esenduran, Gokce
    Kemahlioglu-Ziya, Eda
    Swaminathan, Jayashankar M.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (05) : 924 - 944
  • [27] Optimal Decisions and Implementation Efficiency of the Extended Producer Responsibility System for E-Waste under Take-Back Legislations
    Wang, Zhe
    Wang, Xiaobo
    Li, Bangyi
    Cheng, Yongbo
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [28] Take-back agreements in the perspective of food waste generation at the supplier-retailer interface
    Eriksson, Mattias
    Ghosh, Ranjan
    Mattsson, Lisa
    Ismatov, Alisher
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 122 : 83 - 93
  • [29] The Effects of Patent Extension and Take-Back on Green
    Shi, Tianqin
    Petruzzi, Nicholas C.
    Chhajed, Dilip
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (02) : 810 - 826
  • [30] The market of electrical and electronic equipment waste in Portugal: Analysis of take-back consumers' decisions
    Botelho, Anabela
    Dias, Marta Ferreira
    Ferreira, Carla
    Costa Pinto, Ligia M.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (10) : 1074 - 1080