Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Patel, Nandinee [1 ]
Chong, Kok Wee [2 ]
Yip, Alexander Y. G. [3 ]
Ierodiakonou, Despo [4 ]
Bartra, Joan [5 ]
Boyle, Robert J. [1 ]
Turner, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, Norfolk Pl, London W2 1PG, England
[2] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Med, Allergy Serv, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[4] Univ Nicosia, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Med Sch, Nicosia, Cyprus
[5] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Epinephrine; allergic reaction; anaphylaxis; autoinjector device; refractory anaphylaxis; ORAL FOOD CHALLENGES; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; BIPHASIC REACTIONS; PEDIATRIC ANAPHYLAXIS; ALLERGIC REACTIONS; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; NUT ALLERGY; CHILDREN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Regulatory bodies recommend that all patients at risk of anaphylaxis be prescribed 2 epinephrine autoinjectors, which they should carry at all times. This is in contrast to some guidelines. The proportion of anaphylaxis reactions that are treated with multiple doses of epinephrine has not been systematically evaluated. Objective: Our aim was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting epinephrine treatment for anaphylaxis in which data relating to the number of doses administered were available. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies reporting at least 10 anaphylaxis events (due to food or venom) from 1946 until January 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias was assessed. The study was registered under the PROSPERO identifier CRD42017069109. Results: A total of 86 studies (36,557 anaphylaxis events) met the inclusion criteria (20 of the studies [23%] were prospective studies; 64 [74%] reported reactions in the community, and 22 [26%] included food challenge data). Risk of bias was assessed as low in 50 studies. Overall, 7.7% of anaphylaxis events from any cause (95% CI = 6.4-9.1) were treated with multiple doses of epinephrine. When only epinephrine-treated reactions for which subsequent doses were administered by a health care professional were considered, 11.1% of food-induced reactions (95% CI = 9.4-13.2) and 17.1% of venom-induced reactions (95% CI = 11.3-25.0) were treated with more than 1 epinephrine dose. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the meta-analyses, but at sensitivity analysis this estimate was not affected by study design or anaphylaxis definition. Conclusion: Around 1 in 10 anaphylaxis reactions are treated with more than 1 dose of epinephrine.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1315
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevalence, Management, and Anaphylaxis Risk of Cold Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Prosty, Connor
    Gabrielli, Sofianne
    Le, Michelle
    Ensina, Luis F.
    Zhang, Xun
    Netchiporouk, Elena
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2022, 10 (02): : 586 - +
  • [22] Epinephrine treatment of food-induced and other cause anaphylaxis in United States and Canadian Emergency Departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mehta, Geneva D.
    El Zein, Joumane
    Baroni, Isis Felippe
    Qadir, Myrha
    Mita, Carol
    Cash, Rebecca E.
    Camargo Jr, Carlos A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 19 (09) : 1171 - 1181
  • [23] The Use of the Central Vein Sign in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Castellaro, Marco
    Tamanti, Agnese
    Pisani, Anna Isabella
    Pizzini, Francesca Benedetta
    Crescenzo, Francesco
    Calabrese, Massimiliano
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (12)
  • [24] Methamphetamine use and depression - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leung, Janni
    Yimer, Tesfa Mekonen
    Wang, Xiaoxuan
    Stockings, Emily
    Degenhardt, Louisa
    McKetin, Rebecca
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2022, 41 : S87 - S88
  • [25] Perioperative Use of Clevidipine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Espinosa, Angel
    Ripolles-Melchor, Javier
    Casans-Frances, Ruben
    Abad-Gurumeta, Alfredo
    Bergese, Sergio D.
    Zuleta-Alarcon, Alix
    Lopez-Timoneda, Francisco
    Maria Calvo-Vecino, Jose
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [26] How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Tseng, Timothy Y.
    Dahm, Philipp
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    Preminger, Glenn M.
    Canales, Benjamin J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04): : 1249 - 1256
  • [27] Use of misoprostol in myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iavazzo, Christos
    Mamais, Ioannis
    Gkegkes, Ioannis D.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (06) : 1185 - 1191
  • [28] Use of colchicine in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Indraratna, Praveen L.
    Virk, Sohaib
    Gurram, Divya
    Day, Richard O.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 57 (02) : 382 - 387
  • [29] The use of ketamine as an antidepressant: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Coyle, Caoimhe M.
    Laws, Keith R.
    HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2015, 30 (03) : 152 - 163
  • [30] STRETTA USE FOR GERD : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Malik, Adnan
    Nadeem, Mahum
    Farooq, Umer
    Sohail, Abdullah
    Naseem, Khadija
    Malik, Muhammad I.
    Malik, Sohira
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB275 - AB275