Prophylactic neck dissection for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancers: Risk-benefit analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Dubernard, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Dabakuyo, Sandrine [1 ]
Ouedraogo, Samiratou [1 ]
Amroun, Koceila [3 ]
Kere, David [3 ]
Nasser, Talal [4 ]
Deguelte, Sophie [5 ]
Pochart, Jean-Marie [1 ]
Merol, Jean-Claude [2 ]
Makeieff, Marc [2 ]
Chays, Andre [2 ]
Schvartz, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] CLCC Inst Jean Godinot, Thyroide Marne Ardennes Register, Reims, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Robert Debre, Dept Otolaryngol, Rue Gen Koenig, F-51100 Reims, France
[3] CLCC Inst Jean Godinot, Dept Gen Surg, Reims, France
[4] Polyclin Courlancy, Dept Otolaryngol, Reims, France
[5] Ctr Hosp Robert Debre, Dept Gen Surg, Reims, France
关键词
prophylactic; dissection; low-risk; thyroid; cancers; POSTOPERATIVE THYROGLOBULIN LEVELS; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVES; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; PARATHYROID REOPERATIONS; CARCINOMA; PAPILLARY; IMPACT; MORBIDITY; SURVIVAL; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1002/hed.24402
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. The benefit of neck dissection is the subject of debate in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We analyze the risk-benefit of neck dissection for low-risk DTC without detectable lymph nodes. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study from 1983 to 2003; which included 295 patients without detectable lymph nodes who were treated by thyroidectomy with (C+) or without (C-) neck dissection. All patients had iodine131 therapy. We compared the frequency of remission, disease progression, and permanent complications between groups. Results. Two hundred twelve patients comprised the C1 group, and 83 patients the C-group. Respectively for C1 versus C-, remission rates were 92% versus 89.2% (p=.40), and progressive disease observed was 3.3% versus 7.2% (p=.10). Permanent hypoparathyroidism occurred in 15.1% in C+ versus 3.6% in C-(p=.006). Conclusion. The risk-benefit analysis of neck dissection in patients with low-risk DTC shows no benefit in terms of complete remission or occurrence of progression. However, risk of complications seems to be higher in patients with neck dissection. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1096
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PENTAMIDINE - A RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    WISPELWEY, B
    PEARSON, R
    DRUG SAFETY, 1990, 5 (03) : 212 - 219
  • [32] BIAS IN RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    MAZUR, A
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 1985, 7 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [33] A risk-benefit analysis of vaccination
    Heininger, Ulrich
    VACCINE, 2009, 27 : G9 - G12
  • [34] Symmetrical analysis of risk-benefit
    Warren, John B.
    Day, Simon
    Feldschreiber, Peter
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 74 (05) : 757 - 761
  • [36] EXAMPLES IN RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    WILSON, R
    CHEMTECH, 1975, 5 (10) : 604 - 607
  • [37] RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND THE DETERMINATION OF ACCEPTABLE RISK
    DARDIS, R
    DAVENPORT, G
    KURIN, J
    MARR, J
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 1983, 17 (01) : 38 - 56
  • [38] Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: An Assessment of the Evidence
    Gyorki, David E.
    Untch, Brian
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    Shaha, Ashok R.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (07) : 2285 - 2289
  • [39] PROPHYLACTIC CENTRAL NECK DISSECTION IN WELL-DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER
    Grsic, Kresimir
    Bumber, Boris
    Radivojevic, Renata Curic
    Leovic, Dinko
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2020, 59 : 87 - 95
  • [40] The Role of Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection in the Treatment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
    Hennessy, Max
    Goldenberg, David
    RAMBAM MAIMONIDES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 7 (01):