The Scorecard System for Performance Evaluation of Social Network Management at Work with Stakeholders

被引:0
|
作者
Zotov, V. V. [1 ]
Gubanov, A., V [1 ]
Alekseenko, A., I [1 ]
机构
[1] Kursk Acad State & Municipal Serv, Kursk 305044, Russia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stakeholder Theory argues that when achieving the objectives of an organization, the diverse interests of different stakeholders should be taken into account. Therefore, among the most acute problems of modern management are the use of social networks in the public communication for organizing interaction with stakeholders. This article considers in detail the problem of assessing the effectiveness of the social network management of such a rip. Despite the presence of a large number of monitoring methods, as well as professional network analytics tools, most of them are applicable to a limited number of social networks and are focused mainly on the tasks of marketing promotion. The authors proposed and tested a universal system of indicators based on the pressure-state-response model. Each of the given indicators reflects a specific measured characteristic of the state of the analyzed account, public page or specific post. It is possible to define and fix them both by means of standard functionality, represented by network platforms, and using specialized SMM services. However, it is worth noting that a number of characteristics are available only to resource administrators. In this regard, the most appropriate application of this monitoring method seems to be on a systematic basis, taking into account the availability of direct access to all the target characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 815
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Judgmental Effects of Management Communications and a Fifth Balanced Scorecard Category on Performance Evaluation
    Kaplan, Steven E.
    Wisner, Priscilla S.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING, 2009, 21 (02) : 37 - 56
  • [22] EVALUATION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ON THE BASIS OF THE BALANCED SCORECARD
    Berezin, Andrey
    Gorodnova, Natalia
    Skipin, Dmitri
    [J]. SGEM 2016, BK 2: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL III, 2016, : 221 - 228
  • [23] Performance Evaluation of Laboratory Management System Based on BP Neural Network
    Su, Anjie
    Wu, Zhigang
    Yin, Yifeng
    [J]. DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2022, 2022
  • [24] A design on performance evaluation index system of Research team in Chinese academic humanities and social sciences based on balanced scorecard
    Tan, Chunhui
    Wang, Le
    [J]. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2012, 37 (SUPPL.1): : 93 - 96
  • [25] SOCIAL-WORK PERFORMANCE - STANDARDS AND EVALUATION
    HENDRICKS, T
    [J]. SOCIAL CASEWORK, 1958, 39 (07): : 391 - 396
  • [26] The Balanced Scorecard System in Enterprise Management
    Gavurova, Beata
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2011, 59 (02): : 163 - 177
  • [27] Practice of EVA-Based Balanced Scorecard in the Construction of Performance Evaluation System
    Xie, Dongwen
    Deng, Hui
    [J]. MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 2021
  • [28] Information system for the global performance evaluation of organizations, based on the balanced scorecard method
    Mircea, M.
    Stoian, I.
    Meza, R.
    Dancea, O.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE-TTTC International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, Vol 2, Proceedings, 2006, : 69 - 73
  • [29] Performance evaluation for proactive network management
    DeFranceschi, ASM
    Kormann, LF
    Westphall, CB
    [J]. 1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS - CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TOMORROW'S APPLICATIONS, VOLS. 1-3, 1996, : 22 - 26
  • [30] State Health System Performance A Scorecard
    McCarthy, Douglas
    Schoen, Cathy
    Radley, David
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (02): : 131 - 132