Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview

被引:896
|
作者
Ramesh, T. [1 ]
Prakash, Ravi [1 ]
Shukla, K. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Motilal Nehru Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Motilal Nehru Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Life cycle energy; Embodied energy; Operating energy; Life cycle assessment; Building; EMBODIED ENERGY; OFFICE BUILDINGS; CONSTRUCTION; HOUSES; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings demand energy in their life cycle right from its construction to demolition. Studies on the total energy use during the life cycle are desirable to identify phases of largest energy use and to develop strategies for its reduction. In the present paper, a critical review of the life cycle energy analyses of buildings resulting from 73 cases across 13 countries is presented. The study includes both residential and office buildings. Results show that operating (80-90%) and embodied (10-20%) phases of energy use are significant contributors to building's life cycle energy demand. Life cycle energy (primary) requirement of conventional residential buildings falls in the range of 150-400 kWh/m(2) per year and that of office buildings in the range of 250-550 kWh/m(2) per year. Building's life cycle energy demand can be reduced by reducing its operating energy significantly through use of passive and active technologies even if it leads to a slight increase in embodied energy. However, an excessive use of passive and active features in a building may be counterproductive. It is observed that low energy buildings perform better than self-sufficient (zero operating energy) buildings in the life cycle context. Since, most of the case studies available in open literature pertain to developed and/or cold countries; hence, energy indicative figures for developing and/or non-cold countries need to be evaluated and compared with the results presented in this paper. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1600
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy use during the life cycle of buildings: A method
    Adalberth, K
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (04) : 317 - 320
  • [22] Energy consumption of RC buildings during their life cycle
    Bozdag, Oe.
    Secer, M.
    PORTUGAL SB07 - SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS AND PRACTICES: CHALLENGE OF THE INDUSTRY FOR THE NEW MILLENNIUM, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 480 - +
  • [23] Decomposition of Life Cycle Energy Consumption of Buildings in China
    Lu, Yujie
    Cui, Peng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, 2017, : 1239 - 1247
  • [24] Life Cycle sustainability assessment for zero energy buildings
    Paleari, Michele
    Lavagna, Monica
    Campioli, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 384 - 384
  • [25] Life-cycle energy of residential buildings in China
    Chang, Yuan
    Ries, Robert J.
    Wang, Yaowu
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 656 - 664
  • [26] Energy profiling in the life-cycle assessment of buildings
    Crosbie, Tracey
    Dawood, Nashwan
    Dean, John
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2010, 21 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [27] Analysis of the life cycle stage of prefabricated buildings
    Lv, Zheqi
    Zhang, Dan
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, ENERGY RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING, 2019, 330
  • [28] Life cycle inventory of buildings: A contribution analysis
    Verbeeck, G.
    Hens, H.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (04) : 964 - 967
  • [29] Evaluating the life cycle energy benefits of energy efficiency regulations for buildings
    Crawford, Robert H.
    Bartak, Erika L.
    Stephan, Andre
    Jensen, Christopher A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 63 : 435 - 451
  • [30] Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis
    Bonamente, Emanuele
    Cotana, Franco
    ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (11) : 12685 - 12701